Kathy Kotnowski1, Geoffrey T Fong2, Karine Gallopel-Morvan3, Towhidul Islam4, David Hammond5. 1. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; 2. Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Ontario, Canada; 3. EHESP School of Public Health, Institute of Management, Rennes, France; 4. Marketing and Consumer Studies, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 5. School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada; dhammond@uwaterloo.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The tobacco industry uses various aspects of cigarette packaging design to market to specific groups. The current study examined the relative importance of five cigarette packaging attributes--pack structure (eg, "slims"), brand, branding, warning label size, and price--on perceptions of product taste, harm, and interest in trying, among young females in Canada. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted with smoking and nonsmoking females, aged 16 to 24 (N = 448). Respondents were shown 10 choice sets, each containing four packs with different combinations of the attributes: pack structure (slim, lipstick, booklet, traditional); brand ("Vogue," "du Maurier"); branding (branded, plain); warning label size (50%, 75%); and price ($8.45, $10.45). For each choice set, respondents chose the brand that they: (1) would rather try, (2) would taste better, and (3) would be less harmful, or "none." For each outcome, the attributes' impact on consumer choice was analyzed using a multinomial logit model. RESULTS: The multinomial logit analyses revealed that young females weighted pack structure to be most important to their intention to try (46%), judgment of product taste (52%), and judgment of product harm (48%). Price and branding were weighted important in trial intent decisions (23% and 18%, respectively) and product taste judgments (29% and 15%, respectively). Whereas warning label size and brand were weighted important when judging product harm (23% and 17%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that standardized cigarette packaging may decrease demand and reduce misleading perceptions about product harm among young females.
INTRODUCTION: The tobacco industry uses various aspects of cigarette packaging design to market to specific groups. The current study examined the relative importance of five cigarette packaging attributes--pack structure (eg, "slims"), brand, branding, warning label size, and price--on perceptions of product taste, harm, and interest in trying, among young females in Canada. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was conducted with smoking and nonsmoking females, aged 16 to 24 (N = 448). Respondents were shown 10 choice sets, each containing four packs with different combinations of the attributes: pack structure (slim, lipstick, booklet, traditional); brand ("Vogue," "du Maurier"); branding (branded, plain); warning label size (50%, 75%); and price ($8.45, $10.45). For each choice set, respondents chose the brand that they: (1) would rather try, (2) would taste better, and (3) would be less harmful, or "none." For each outcome, the attributes' impact on consumer choice was analyzed using a multinomial logit model. RESULTS: The multinomial logit analyses revealed that young females weighted pack structure to be most important to their intention to try (46%), judgment of product taste (52%), and judgment of product harm (48%). Price and branding were weighted important in trial intent decisions (23% and 18%, respectively) and product taste judgments (29% and 15%, respectively). Whereas warning label size and brand were weighted important when judging product harm (23% and 17%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that standardized cigarette packaging may decrease demand and reduce misleading perceptions about product harm among young females.
Authors: Chris Skurka; Motasem Kalaji; Michael C Dorf; Deena Kemp; Amelia Greiner Safi; Sahara Byrne; Alan D Mathios; Rosemary J Avery; Jeff Niederdeppe Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Chris Skurka; Deena Kemp; Julie Davydova; James F Thrasher; Sahara Byrne; Amelia Greiner Safi; Rosemary J Avery; Michael C Dorf; Alan D Mathios; Leah Scolere; Jeff Niederdeppe Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Crawford Moodie; Philip Gendall; Janet Hoek; Anne Marie MacKintosh; Catherine Best; Susan Murray Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Christina N Kyriakos; Pete Driezen; Charis Girvalaki; Sara C Hitchman; Filippos T Filippidis; Shannon Gravely; James Balmford; Katerina Nikitara; Ute Mons; Esteve Fernández; Krzysztof Przewoźniak; Antigona C Trofor; Tibor Demjén; Witold Zatoński; Yannis Tountas; Geoffrey T Fong; Constantine I Vardavas Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2020-07-01 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Ann McNeill; Shannon Gravely; Sara C Hitchman; Linda Bauld; David Hammond; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-27
Authors: Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez; Farahnaz Islam; Yoo Jin Cho; Ramzi George Salloum; Jordan Louviere; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Luz Myriam Reynales-Shigematsu; Joaquin Barnoya; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James Hardin; James F Thrasher Journal: Tob Control Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: James F Thrasher; Farahnaz Islam; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Rosibel Rodriguez-Bolaños; Belen Saenz de Miera Juarez; James W Hardin; Inti Barrientos-Gutierrez Journal: Addiction Date: 2021-11-15 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: James F Thrasher; Dien Anshari; Victoria Lambert-Jessup; Farahnaz Islam; Erin Mead; Lucy Popova; Ramzi Salloum; Crawford Moodie; Jordan Louviere; Eric N Lindblom Journal: Tob Regul Sci Date: 2018-03