Literature DB >> 26014309

The combined effect of the electronic health record and hospitalist care on length of stay.

Jinhyung Lee1, Yong-Fang Kuo, Yu-Li Lin, James S Goodwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the combined impact of electronic health record (EHR) adoption and hospitalist care on length of stay (LOS). STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society and a 5% national sample of Medicare beneficiaries. Patients included 20,862 admissions for respiratory disease cared for by hospitalists, and 28,714 admissions for respiratory disease cared for by nonhospitalists in 2985 general and surgical hospitals in the United States.
METHODS: The interaction effect of EHR and hospitalist care on LOS was evaluated using generalized linear models with log-link normal distribution after controlling for patient and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: In multivariable analyses controlling for patient and hospital characteristics, we found that the reduced LOS associated with complete EHR was 0.166 days and was statistically significant in the hospitals in which 50% or less of patients were cared for by hospitalists. Moreover, we found that reductions in LOS associated with hospitalist care were greater in hospitals that had not adopted a complete EHR. LOS was 0.599 days shorter for patients cared for by hospitalists versus nonhospitalists in hospitals with incomplete EHR adoption; in hospitals with complete EHR adoption, the stay was 0.433 days shorter.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduced LOS associated with hospitalist care is greater than that associated with EHR adoption. However, the combined reduction in LOS with both EHR adoption and hospitalist care may be substantial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26014309      PMCID: PMC6211163     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  22 in total

1.  Can health care information technology save babies?

Authors:  Amalia R Miller; Catherine E Tucker
Journal:  J Polit Econ       Date:  2011

2.  Effect of hospitalists on length of stay in the medicare population: variation according to hospital and patient characteristics.

Authors:  Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 3.  The impact of hospitalists on the cost and quality of inpatient care in the United States: a research synthesis.

Authors:  Janet Coffman; Thomas G Rundall
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  The effect of a hospitalist service with nurse discharge planner on patient care in an academic teaching hospital.

Authors:  H C Palmer; N S Armistead; D M Elnicki; A K Halperin; P R Ogershok; S Manivannan; G R Hobbs; K Evans
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Measuring the cost impact of hospital information systems: 1987-1994.

Authors:  Ron Borzekowski
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Reorganizing an academic medical service: impact on cost, quality, patient satisfaction, and education.

Authors:  R M Wachter; P Katz; J Showstack; A B Bindman; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-05-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Reflections: the hospitalist movement a decade later.

Authors:  Robert M Wachter
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.960

9.  Electronic medical records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from California hospitals, 1998-2007.

Authors:  Michael F Furukawa; T S Raghu; Benjamin B M Shao
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The effect of electronic medical record adoption on outcomes in US hospitals.

Authors:  Jinhyung Lee; Yong-Fang Kuo; James S Goodwin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.