Literature DB >> 26014300

Clinical Development Strategies and Outcomes in First-in-Human Trials of Monoclonal Antibodies.

Diego Tosi1, Yassine Laghzali2, Marie Vinches2, Marie Alexandre2, Krisztian Homicsko2, Angelica Fasolo2, Gianluca Del Conte2, Anna Durigova2, Nadia Hayaoui2, Sophie Gourgou2, Luca Gianni2, Caroline Mollevi2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We conducted a comprehensive review of the design, implementation, and outcome of first-in-human (FIH) trials of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to clearly determine early clinical development strategies for this class of compounds.
METHODS: We performed a PubMed search using appropriate terms to identify reports of FIH trials of mAbs published in peer-reviewed journals between January 2000 and April 2013.
RESULTS: A total of 82 publications describing FIH trials were selected for analysis. Only 27 articles (33%) reported the criteria used for selecting the starting dose (SD). Dose escalation was performed using rule-based methods in 66 trials (80%). The median number of planned dose levels was five (range, two to 13). The median of the ratio between the highest planned dose and the SD was 27 (range, two to 3,333). Although in 56 studies (68%) at least one grade 3 or 4 toxicity event was reported, no dose-limiting toxicity was observed in 47 trials (57%). The highest planned dose was reached in all trials, but the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was defined in only 13 studies (16%). The median of the ratio between MTD and SD was eight (range, four to 1,000). The recommended phase II dose was indicated in 34 studies (41%), but in 25 (73%) of these trials, this dose was chosen without considering toxicity as the main selection criterion.
CONCLUSION: This literature review highlights the broad design heterogeneity of FIH trials testing mAbs. Because of the limited observed toxicity, the MTD was infrequently reached, and therefore, the recommended phase II dose for subsequent clinical trials was only tentatively defined.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26014300     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.1082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  11 in total

1.  Immuno-PET to Optimize the Dose of Monoclonal Antibodies for Cancer Therapy: How Much Is Enough?

Authors:  Raymond M Reilly
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  Setting the Dose of Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of Clinical Pharmacology.

Authors:  Etienne Chatelut; Félicien Le Louedec; Gérard Milano
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  89Zr-Lumretuzumab PET Imaging before and during HER3 Antibody Lumretuzumab Treatment in Patients with Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Frederike Bensch; Laetitia E Lamberts; Michaël M Smeenk; Annelies Jorritsma-Smit; Marjolijn N Lub-de Hooge; Anton G T Terwisscha van Scheltinga; Johan R de Jong; Jourik A Gietema; Carolien P Schröder; Marlene Thomas; Wolfgang Jacob; Keelara Abiraj; Celine Adessi; Georgina Meneses-Lorente; Ian James; Martin Weisser; Adrienne H Brouwers; Elisabeth G E de Vries
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  Which factors matter the most? Revisiting and dissecting antibody therapeutic doses.

Authors:  Yu Tang; Xiaobing Li; Yanguang Cao
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 8.369

Review 5.  Approaches to modernize the combination drug development paradigm.

Authors:  Daphne Day; Lillian L Siu
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 11.117

Review 6.  Determination of the starting dose in the first-in-human clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies: a systematic review of papers published between 1990 and 2013.

Authors:  Hoon Young Suh; Carl C Peck; Kyung-Sang Yu; Howard Lee
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 4.162

7.  Tutorial on Monoclonal Antibody Pharmacokinetics and Its Considerations in Early Development.

Authors:  Meric Ovacik; Kedan Lin
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Efficacy and safety of anticancer drug combinations: a meta-analysis of randomized trials with a focus on immunotherapeutics and gene-targeted compounds.

Authors:  Denis L Jardim; Débora De Melo Gagliato; Mina Nikanjam; Donald A Barkauskas; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 8.110

9.  Optimal biological dose: a systematic review in cancer phase I clinical trials.

Authors:  J Fraisse; D Dinart; D Tosi; C Bellera; C Mollevi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Underutilize Immune Response Monitoring.

Authors:  Claire M Connell; Sophie E M Raby; Ian Beh; Thomas R Flint; Edward H Williams; Douglas T Fearon; Duncan I Jodrell; Tobias Janowitz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2017-10-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.