Literature DB >> 26013980

Is mouse embryonic stem cell technology obsolete?

William C Skarnes1.   

Abstract

Injection of recombinant Cas9 protein and synthetic guide RNAs into mouse zygotes has been shown to facilitate gene disruption and knock-ins using the CRISPR system. These technologies may soon displace genetic modification using embryonic stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013980      PMCID: PMC4443626          DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0673-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Biol        ISSN: 1474-7596            Impact factor:   13.583


  10 in total

1.  One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering.

Authors:  Hui Yang; Haoyi Wang; Chikdu S Shivalila; Albert W Cheng; Linyu Shi; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function.

Authors:  William C Skarnes; Barry Rosen; Anthony P West; Manousos Koutsourakis; Wendy Bushell; Vivek Iyer; Alejandro O Mujica; Mark Thomas; Jennifer Harrow; Tony Cox; David Jackson; Jessica Severin; Patrick Biggs; Jun Fu; Michael Nefedov; Pieter J de Jong; A Francis Stewart; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Gene targeting by homologous recombination in mouse zygotes mediated by zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Melanie Meyer; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Wolfgang Wurst; Ralf Kühn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Double-strand breaks at the target locus stimulate gene targeting in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  F Smih; P Rouet; P J Romanienko; M Jasin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-12-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Targeted correction of a major histocompatibility class II E alpha gene by DNA microinjected into mouse eggs.

Authors:  R L Brinster; R E Braun; D Lo; M R Avarbock; F Oram; R D Palmiter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Extensive genomic copy number variation in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Qi Liang; Nathalie Conte; William C Skarnes; Allan Bradley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering.

Authors:  Haoyi Wang; Hui Yang; Chikdu S Shivalila; Meelad M Dawlaty; Albert W Cheng; Feng Zhang; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Mice with megabase humanization of their immunoglobulin genes generate antibodies as efficiently as normal mice.

Authors:  Andrew J Murphy; Lynn E Macdonald; Sean Stevens; Margaret Karow; Anthony T Dore; Kevin Pobursky; Tammy T Huang; William T Poueymirou; Lakeisha Esau; Melissa Meola; Warren Mikulka; Pamela Krueger; Jeanette Fairhurst; David M Valenzuela; Nicholas Papadopoulos; George D Yancopoulos
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Cloning-free CRISPR/Cas system facilitates functional cassette knock-in in mice.

Authors:  Tomomi Aida; Keiho Chiyo; Takako Usami; Harumi Ishikubo; Risa Imahashi; Yusaku Wada; Kenji F Tanaka; Tetsushi Sakuma; Takashi Yamamoto; Kohichi Tanaka
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Highly efficient gene knockout in mice and zebrafish with RNA-guided endonucleases.

Authors:  Young Hoon Sung; Jong Min Kim; Hyun-Taek Kim; Jaehoon Lee; Jisun Jeon; Young Jin; Jung-Hwa Choi; Young Ho Ban; Sang-Jun Ha; Cheol-Hee Kim; Han-Woong Lee; Jin-Soo Kim
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 9.043

  10 in total
  9 in total

1.  GONAD: A Novel CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Method that Does Not Require Ex Vivo Handling of Embryos.

Authors:  Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Gou Takahashi; Kenta Wada; Hiromi Miura; Masahiro Sato; Masato Ohtsuka
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-01

2.  Easi-CRISPR for creating knock-in and conditional knockout mouse models using long ssDNA donors.

Authors:  Hiromi Miura; Rolen M Quadros; Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Masato Ohtsuka
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 3.  Application of Mouse Models to Research in Hearing and Balance.

Authors:  Kevin K Ohlemiller; Sherri M Jones; Kenneth R Johnson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-17

4.  Efficient mouse genome engineering by CRISPR-EZ technology.

Authors:  Andrew J Modzelewski; Sean Chen; Brandon J Willis; K C Kent Lloyd; Joshua A Wood; Lin He
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  Gene cassette knock-in in mammalian cells and zygotes by enhanced MMEJ.

Authors:  Tomomi Aida; Shota Nakade; Tetsushi Sakuma; Yayoi Izu; Ayu Oishi; Keiji Mochida; Harumi Ishikubo; Takako Usami; Hidenori Aizawa; Takashi Yamamoto; Kohichi Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 6.  Using the CRISPR/Cas9 system to understand neuropeptide biology and regulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Hay; Christopher Knowles; Andreas Kolb; Alasdair MacKenzie
Journal:  Neuropeptides       Date:  2016-12-03       Impact factor: 3.286

7.  Maternal Supply of Cas9 to Zygotes Facilitates the Efficient Generation of Site-Specific Mutant Mouse Models.

Authors:  Alberto Cebrian-Serrano; Shijun Zha; Lars Hanssen; Daniel Biggs; Christopher Preece; Benjamin Davies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Generating mouse models for biomedical research: technological advances.

Authors:  Channabasavaiah B Gurumurthy; Kevin C Kent Lloyd
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.758

9.  Generation of mouse conditional knockout alleles in one step using the i-GONAD method.

Authors:  Renjie Shang; Haifeng Zhang; Pengpeng Bi
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 9.043

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.