Literature DB >> 26013635

A new theory on the pathogenesis of acquired cholesteatoma: Mucosal traction.

Robert K Jackler1, Peter L Santa Maria1, Yasin K Varsak1, Anh Nguyen2, Nikolas H Blevins1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Although the migration of its squamous outer surface of the tympanic membrane has been well characterized, there is a paucity of data available concerning the migratory behavior of its medial mucosal surface. Existing theories of primary acquired cholesteatoma pathogenesis do not adequately explain the observed characteristics of the disease. We propose a new hypothesis, based upon a conjecture that mucosal membrane interactions are the driving force in cholesteatoma. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective chart review and a prospective observational cohort study in rats.
METHODS: After developing the new theory, it was tested through both clinical and experimental observations. To evaluate whether impairment of middle ear mucociliary migration would influence cholesteatoma formation, a retrospective chart review evaluating cholesteatoma occurrence in a sizable population of patients with either primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) or cystic fibrosis (CF) was performed. To study mucosal migration on the medial aspect of the tympanic membrane, ink tattoos were monitored over time in a rat model.
RESULTS: No cholesteatomas were identified in either PCD patients (470) or in CF patients (1,910). In the rat model, mucosa of the posterior pars tensa migrated toward the posterior superior quadrant, whereas the mucosa of the anterior pars tensa migrated radially toward the annulus.
CONCLUSION: Mucosal coupling with traction generated by interaction of migrating opposing surfaces provides the first comprehensive theory that explains the observed characteristics of primary acquired cholesteatoma. The somewhat counterintuitive hypothesis that cholesteatoma is fundamentally a mucosal disease has numerous therapeutic implications.
© 2015 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cholesteatoma; migration; mucosa; pathogenesis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013635     DOI: 10.1002/lary.25261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  A new theory interprets the development of a retraction pocket as a natural self-healing process.

Authors:  Karl-Bernd Hüttenbrink
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Cholesteatoma surgery in the pediatric population: remaining challenges in the era of mastoid obliteration.

Authors:  Victor J Kroon; Steven W Mes; Pepijn A Borggreven; Rick van de Langenberg; David R Colnot; Jasper J Quak
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-10-08       Impact factor: 3.236

3.  A Case Report of a Giant Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Neelam Sood; Binit Kumar Khandelia; Gitanjali Bugnait
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  The Role of Tympanic Membrane Retractions in Cholesteatoma Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Letícia Petersen Schmidt Rosito; Neil Sperling; Adriane Ribeiro Teixeira; Fábio André Selaimen; Sady Selaimen da Costa
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Analysis of KRT1, KRT10, KRT19, TP53 and MMP9 expression in pediatric and adult cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Enikő Palkó; Szilárd Póliska; István Sziklai; András Penyige
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Developmental aspects of the tympanic membrane: Shedding light on function and disease.

Authors:  Mona Mozaffari; Dan Jiang; Abigail S Tucker
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 7.  Anatomy and Development of the Mammalian External Auditory Canal: Implications for Understanding Canal Disease and Deformity.

Authors:  Mona Mozaffari; Robert Nash; Abigail S Tucker
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-01-08

8.  Assessing the Prognostic Value of the ChOLE Classification in Predicting the Severity of Acquired Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Maura C Eggink; Maarten J F de Wolf; Fenna A Ebbens; Frederik G Dikkers; Erik van Spronsen
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 9.  Pathogenesis and Bone Resorption in Acquired Cholesteatoma: Current Knowledge and Future Prospectives.

Authors:  Mahmood A Hamed; Seiichi Nakata; Ramadan H Sayed; Hiromi Ueda; Badawy S Badawy; Yoichi Nishimura; Takuro Kojima; Noboru Iwata; Ahmed R Ahmed; Khalid Dahy; Naoki Kondo; Kenji Suzuki
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.372

10.  Surgical Guidance for Removal of Cholesteatoma Using a Multispectral 3D-Endoscope.

Authors:  Eric L Wisotzky; Jean-Claude Rosenthal; Ulla Wege; Anna Hilsmann; Peter Eisert; Florian C Uecker
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.