Literature DB >> 26013443

Surgical follow-up costs disproportionately impact low-income patients.

Aaron R Scott1, Augustus J Rush2, Aanand D Naik3, David H Berger4, James W Suliburk5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures have significant costs at the national level, but the financial burden on patients is equally important. Patients' out-of-pocket costs for surgery and surgical care include not only direct medical costs but also the indirect cost of lost wages and direct nonmedical costs including transportation and childcare. We hypothesized that the nonmedical costs of routine postoperative clinic visits disproportionately impact low-income patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study performed in the postoperative acute care surgery clinic at a large, urban county hospital. A survey containing items about social, demographic, and financial data was collected from ambulatory patients. Nonmedical costs were calculated as the sum of transportation, childcare, and lost wages. Costs and cost to income ratios were compared between income strata.
RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients responded to the survey of which 59 reported all items needed for cost calculations. The median calculated cost of a clinic visit was $27 (interquartile range $18-59). Components of this cost were $16 ($14-$20) for travel, $22 ($17-$50) for childcare among patients requiring childcare, and $0 ($0-$30) in lost wages. Low-income patients had significantly higher (P = 0.0001) calculated cost to income ratios, spending nearly 10% of their monthly income on these costs.
CONCLUSIONS: The financial burden of routine postoperative clinic visits is significant. Consistent with our hypothesis, the lowest income patients are disproportionately impacted, spending nearly 10% of their monthly income on costs associated with the clinic visit. Future cost-containment efforts should examine alternative, lower cost methods of follow-up, which reduce financial burden.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare disparities; Postoperative care; Surgical cost; Surgical follow-up; Surgical value

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013443     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  5 in total

1.  Postoperative appointments: which ones count?

Authors:  Margaret G Mueller; Dana Elborno; Bhumy A Davé; Alix Leader-Cramer; Christina Lewicky-Gaupp; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Robotic prostatectomy is associated with increased patient travel and treatment delay.

Authors:  Matthew J Maurice; Hui Zhu; Simon P Kim; Robert Abouassaly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  What Factors Are Associated with Increased Financial Burden and High Financial Worry For Patients Undergoing Common Hand Procedures?

Authors:  David N Bernstein; Jillian S Gruber; Nelson Merchan; Jayden Garcia; Carl M Harper; Tamara D Rozental
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 4.  Assessing the Functional Status of Older Cancer Patients in an Ambulatory Care Visit.

Authors:  Janine Overcash
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-09-18

5.  Decreasing Unexpected Returns to Orthopedic Hand Clinic: Improving Efficiency of Health Care Delivery.

Authors:  Kevin J Little; Samir Trehan; Roger Cornwall; Stephanie Garrison; Emily Dastillung; Lisa McFadden
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-09-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.