BACKGROUND & AIMS: The hepatoma arterial-embolization prognostic (HAP) score predicts survival outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). We validated the HAP score in Korean subjects with HCC and investigated whether its prognostic performance is improved with additional parameters. METHODS: A total of 280 patients with HCC treated with TACE between 2003 and 2009 were included. Validation and modification of HAP score were performed based on multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: The median age of the study population (211 men, 69 women) was 60 years. Viral etiology of HCC accounted for 80.4% (n = 181 for hepatitis B, 44 for hepatitis C). The median overall survival (OS) was 40.5 months. On multivariate analysis, together with the original components of the HAP score (serum albumin <3.6 g/dl, total bilirubin >0.9 mg/dl, alpha-foetoprotein >400 ng/ml, and tumor size >7 cm), tumor number ≥2 was selected as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.3; P < 0.001). Accordingly, a modified HAP-II (mHAP-II) score was established by adding tumor number ≥2. Although both HAP and mHAP-II scores discriminated the four different risk groups (log-rank test, all P < 0.001), the mHAP-II score performed significantly better than the HAP score, as per the areas under receiver-operating curves predicting OS at 3 years (0.717 vs. 0.658) and 5 years (0.728 vs. 0.645), respectively (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the HAP score predicted OS for Korean subjects with HCC undergoing TACE, the addition of tumor number significantly improved the prognostic performance. The mHAP-II score can be used for accurate prognostication and selection of optimal candidates for TACE.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The hepatoma arterial-embolization prognostic (HAP) score predicts survival outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE). We validated the HAP score in Korean subjects with HCC and investigated whether its prognostic performance is improved with additional parameters. METHODS: A total of 280 patients with HCC treated with TACE between 2003 and 2009 were included. Validation and modification of HAP score were performed based on multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: The median age of the study population (211 men, 69 women) was 60 years. Viral etiology of HCC accounted for 80.4% (n = 181 for hepatitis B, 44 for hepatitis C). The median overall survival (OS) was 40.5 months. On multivariate analysis, together with the original components of the HAP score (serum albumin <3.6 g/dl, total bilirubin >0.9 mg/dl, alpha-foetoprotein >400 ng/ml, and tumor size >7 cm), tumor number ≥2 was selected as an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio 2.3; P < 0.001). Accordingly, a modified HAP-II (mHAP-II) score was established by adding tumor number ≥2. Although both HAP and mHAP-II scores discriminated the four different risk groups (log-rank test, all P < 0.001), the mHAP-II score performed significantly better than the HAP score, as per the areas under receiver-operating curves predicting OS at 3 years (0.717 vs. 0.658) and 5 years (0.728 vs. 0.645), respectively (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although the HAP score predicted OS for Korean subjects with HCC undergoing TACE, the addition of tumor number significantly improved the prognostic performance. The mHAP-II score can be used for accurate prognostication and selection of optimal candidates for TACE.
Authors: Dong Hyun Sinn; Seung Up Kim; Hye Kyung Hyun; Eun Ju Cho; Soo Young Park; Young Mi Hong; Soon Sun Kim; Hwi Young Kim; Nae-Yun Heo; Jung Gil Park; Wonseok Kang; Song Won Jeong; Myeong Jun Song; Hana Park; Danbi Lee; Yong Sun Lee; Sung Bum Cho; Chan Sik An; Hyung Jin Rhee; Hyun Woong Lee; Beom Kyung Kim; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Kwang-Hyub Han; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Su Jong Yu; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Won Young Tak; Young Oh Kweon; Ki Tae Yoon; Mong Cho; Jae Youn Cheong; Seung Ha Park Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Claudia Campani; Alessandro Vitale; Gabriele Dragoni; Umberto Arena; Giacomo Laffi; Umberto Cillo; Edoardo G Giannini; Francesco Tovoli; Gian Ludovico Rapaccini; Maria Di Marco; Eugenio Caturelli; Marco Zoli; Rodolfo Sacco; Giuseppe Cabibbo; Andrea Mega; Maria Guarino; Antonio Gasbarrini; Gianluca Svegliati-Baroni; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Elisabetta Biasini; Alberto Masotto; Gerardo Nardone; Giovanni Raimondo; Francesco Azzaroli; Gianpaolo Vidili; Maurizia Rossana Brunetto; Fabio Farinati; Franco Trevisani; Fabio Marra Journal: Liver Cancer Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 11.740
Authors: Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Arndt Weinmann; Irene Schmidtmann; Sandra Koch; Sebastian Schotten; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Michael Bernhard Pitton; Christoph Dueber; Peter Robert Galle; Roman Kloeckner Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Mi Young Jeon; Hye Soo Kim; Tae Seop Lim; Dai Hoon Han; Beom Kyung Kim; Jun Yong Park; Do Young Kim; Sang Hoon Ahn; Gi Hong Choi; Jin Sub Choi; Kwang-Hyub Han; Seung Up Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Lukas Müller; Felix Hahn; Aline Mähringer-Kunz; Fabian Stoehr; Simon J Gairing; Friedrich Foerster; Arndt Weinmann; Peter R Galle; Jens Mittler; Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Michael B Pitton; Christoph Düber; Roman Kloeckner Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Joon Yeul Nam; A Reum Choe; Dong Hyun Sinn; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Hwi Young Kim; Su Jong Yu; Yoon Jun Kim; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Jeong Min Lee; Jin Wook Chung; Sun Young Choi; Jeong Kyong Lee; Seung Yon Baek; Hye Ah Lee; Tae Hun Kim; Kwon Yoo Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-06-01 Impact factor: 4.430