Literature DB >> 26013133

Are Horn Morphological Patterns Able to Differentiate the Two Closely Related Species Copris klugi Harold and Copris sierrensis Matthews?

A Pizzo1, V Citeroni, F Mazzone, M Dellacasa, C Palestrini.   

Abstract

Several thousand species of beetles evolved impressive, exaggerated horns or horn-like structures. The horn phenotypic patterns and the developmental mechanisms are well documented especially in the Scarabaeidae, the family most predominated by species with horns. The regulation of horn expression appears to be extremely evolutionary labile to the extent that horn allometric patterns have been seen to rapidly diverge between closely related species. For this reason, it has been suggested that horn morphological pattern may be able to differentiate closely related and sibling species even when other traits fail. In this study, we used horn morphological pattern (shape and allometric variation) as a "tool" to evaluate the differentiation of two closely related scarab species, Copris klugi Harold and Copris sierrensis Matthews whose full species status has long been debated due to their high similarity. Combining traditional and geometric morphometric methods, we evidenced that male head horn phenotypic pattern is able to clearly differentiate C. klugi from C. sierrensis, supporting the hypothesis that they are two true species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26013133     DOI: 10.1007/s13744-015-0277-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neotrop Entomol        ISSN: 1519-566X            Impact factor:   1.434


  17 in total

Review 1.  The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects.

Authors:  D J Emlen; H F Nijhout
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 19.686

2.  Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures.

Authors:  D J Emlen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Hormonal control of male horn length dimorphism in the dung beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).

Authors:  D J. Emlen; H F. Nijhout
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.354

4.  On the origin and evolutionary diversification of beetle horns.

Authors:  Douglas J Emlen; Laura Corley Lavine; Ben Ewen-Campen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology.

Authors:  H F Nijhout; D J Emlen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-31       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Matters of scale: positive allometry and the evolution of male dimorphisms.

Authors:  Joseph L Tomkins; Janne S Kotiaho; Natasha R LeBas
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Beetle horns and horned beetles: emerging models in developmental evolution and ecology.

Authors:  Teiya Kijimoto; Melissa Pespeni; Oliver Beckers; Armin P Moczek
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.814

8.  Sexual and male horn dimorphism in Copris ochus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae).

Authors:  Shinji Sugiura; Yuichi Yamaura; Hiroshi Makihara
Journal:  Zoolog Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 0.931

9.  Rapid evolution of a polyphenic threshold.

Authors:  Armin P Moczek; H Frederik Nijhout
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  Rapid antagonistic coevolution between primary and secondary sexual characters in horned beetles.

Authors:  Harald F Parzer; Armin P Moczek
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evidence for Male Horn Dimorphism and Related Pronotal Shape Variation in Copris lunaris (Linnaeus, 1758) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Coprini).

Authors:  Kaan Kerman; Angela Roggero; Antonio Rolando; Claudia Palestrini
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.769

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.