Literature DB >> 26013025

Is there an additive value of 18 F-FDG PET-CT to CT/MRI for detecting nodal metastasis in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients with palpably negative neck?

Beomseok Sohn1, Yoon Woo Koh2, Won Jun Kang3, Jae-Hoon Lee3, Na-Young Shin1, Jinna Kim1.   

Abstract

Background Cervical node metastasis is one of the most significant prognostic factors in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). There is little information regarding the comparison of histopathologic analysis following neck dissection with imaging results in oropharyngeal SCC. Purpose To investigate the clinical utility of PET-CT compared with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for detecting nodal metastasis in oropharyngeal SCC patients with palpably negative neck and to investigate whether pretreatment imaging modalities support the rationale for elective neck treatment. Material and Methods A total of 49 oropharyngeal SCC patients with palpably negative neck (42 men, 7 women; average age, 59.1 years) underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection as a primary treatment. All patients were preoperatively evaluated with PET-CT and CT/MRI, and the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality was assessed by comparison with histopathologic results of the surgical specimen. Results Twenty-five (51.0%) of our 49 patients had neck metastases. On a level-by-level analysis, the sensitivity of PET-CT, CT/MRI, and a combination of PET-CT and CT/MRI was 54.6%, 54.6%, and 60.6%, respectively, at all neck levels. The area under the ROC showed that the diagnostic performance of the combined interpretation was not significantly different from that of CT/MRI alone (0.780 vs. 0.750, respectively; P = 0.158) and PET-CT alone (0.780 vs. 0.765, respectively; P = 0.501). Conclusion Addition of PET-CT to CT/MRI did not provide better diagnostic accuracy for detecting nodal metastasis in preoperative evaluation of oropharyngeal SCC patients with palpably negative neck, suggesting that current imaging studies might not replace elective neck dissection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Positron emission tomography (PET); computed tomography (CT); head and neck; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26013025     DOI: 10.1177/0284185115587544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  8 in total

1.  Imaging at diagnosis impacts cancer-specific survival among patients with cancer of the oropharynx.

Authors:  Rustain L Morgan; Megan M Eguchi; Adam C Mueller; Stacie L Daugherty; Arya Amini; Sana D Karam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  How is neck dissection performed in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery? Results of a representative nationwide survey among university and non-university hospitals in Germany.

Authors:  Andreas Pabst; Daniel G E Thiem; Elisabeth Goetze; Alexander K Bartella; Michael T Neuhaus; Jürgen Hoffmann; Alexander-N Zeller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  Occult lymph node metastasis in the contralateral neck of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis and literature review.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Xingzhou Su; Yumeng Qiao; Shaohui Huang; Yurong Kou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A model to predict nodal metastasis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  R K De Silva; B S M S Siriwardena; A Samaranayaka; W A M U L Abeyasinghe; W M Tilakaratne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Review of Controversial Issues in the Management of Head and Neck Cancer: A Swiss Multidisciplinary and Multi-Institutional Patterns of Care Study-Part 1 (Head and Neck Surgery).

Authors:  Pavel Dulguerov; Martina A Broglie; Guido Henke; Marco Siano; Paul Martin Putora; Christian Simon; Daniel Zwahlen; Gerhard F Huber; Giorgio Ballerini; Lorenza Beffa; Roland Giger; Sacha Rothschild; Sandro V Negri; Olgun Elicin
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Comparison of Clinical Examination and Various Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Uwe Schneider; Inse Graß; Martin Laudien; Joachim Quetz; Hendrik Graefe; Barbara Wollenberg; Jens Eduard Meyer
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-05-13

7.  Cervical Lymph Nodes Detected by F-18 FDG PET/CT in Oncology Patients: Added Value of Subsequent Ultrasonography for Determining Nodal Metastasis.

Authors:  Kyeong Hwa Ryu; Seokho Yoon; Hye Jin Baek; Tae Hoon Kim; Jin Il Moon; Bo Hwa Choi; Sung Eun Park; Ji Young Ha; Dae Hyun Song; Hyo Jung An; Young Jin Heo
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.430

8.  Distant metastases and synchronous malignancies on FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lennart Flygare; Amal Al-Ubaedi; Wilhelm Öhman; Susanna Jakobson Mo
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2020-01-05       Impact factor: 1.990

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.