Spin Polarization Inversion at Benzene-Absorbed Fe4N Surface.

We report a first-principle study on electronic structure and simulation of the spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy graphic of a benzene/Fe(4)N interface. Fe(4)N is a compound ferromagnet suitable for many spintronic applications. We found that, depending on the particular termination schemes and interface configurations, the spin polarization on the benzene surface shows a rich variety of properties ranging from cosine-type oscillation to polarization inversion. Spin-polarization inversion above benzene is resulting from the hybridizations between C p(z) and the out-of-plane d orbitals of Fe atom.

In recent years, combining inorganic and organic materials have opened many venues for the novel science and applications. The rising field of organic spintronics is one of them123456. Organic materials, with long spin-flip diffusion length and weak spin-orbit coupling, are desirable in many spintronic applications27891011121314151617. Moreover, the functionalities of devices made of organic materials can be manipulated through relatively simple methods such as ligand modification1819 and isomerization2021.

A major topic in organic spintronics is the spin related properties at the interface between a ferromagnetic substrate and organic material, i.e. the spinterface22. Much effort has been made to clarify the underlying mechanisms that drive the peculiarities, such as spin polarization inversion, at various spinterfaces2123242526. For the interfaces between Fe and benzene molecule (as well as C5H5 and C8H8), Atodiresei et al. argue that it is the p-d Zener exchange-type mechanism that leads to the spin-polarization inversion24. In another study on the thiophene/cobalt(001) interface25, the strong spatial dependence of the spin polarization at the interface is attributed to the reduced molecular symmetry. The azobenzene isomer adsorbed on Fe surface has been reported recently, where the switch between two types of azobenzenes takes place by applying light and/or heat21. On the other hand, studies are extended to systems consisting of AFM substrates including benzene adsorbed on monolayer AFM Mn26 or metal phthalocyanine4272829, where the spin polarization modification has often been reported.

But, we are not aware of any investigations into the interfaces between an organic molecule and a compound ferromagnet, such as iron nitride (Fe4N). Fe4N carries a high spin polarization of nearly ~100%30 as well as a large saturation magnetization of 1200 emu/cm3 31. Its Curie temperature is about 760 K. Together with its high chemical stability32 and low coercivity33, Fe4N is a promising candidate for, among other, spin injection source34. In this work, we scrutinize the spinterface between a benzene molecule and Fe4N substrate. In particular, we will show that different termination schemes and adsorption configurations unique to the benzene/Fe4N interface enrich the properties of spin polarization.

Calculation details

Our first principles calculations are based on the density-functional theory (DFT) and the projector augmented wave method as implemented in the Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package code3536. For the exchange and correlation functional, we use the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof spin-polarized generalized gradient approximation (PBE-GGA)37. The plane-wave basis set is converged using a 500 eV energy cutoff. A Γ-centered 3 × 3 × 1 k-mesh is used for the Brillouin-zone integrations. A Gaussian smearing of 0.02 eV is used for the initial occupations. It is worth pointing out that van der Waals force is excluded from our calculation. We do so not only because strong bonding exits between benzene molecule and Fe4N (as shown in the due discussion), but also recent studies suggest that it has a negligible effect on GGA optimized structure in, for example, azobenzene/Fe(110)21.

Bulk Fe4N has a cubic perovskite-type structure (Pm3m) with a lattice constant of 3.795 Ǻ34. Fe occupies the corner (FeI) or face-centered (FeII) position labeled structure graphic of bulk Fe4N, whereas N locates at the body-centered site34, as shown in Fig. 1(a). Our calculations give a lattice constant of 3.789 Ǻ, in agreement with the experimental value34. The Fe4N substrate is modeled by slabs of three atomic layers with a (3 × 3) flat surface. We concentrate, in this work, on the effect of different adsorption schemes on the spatial spin-polarization distribution. The subtleties due to the number of atomic layers will be reported in upcoming studies.

Figure 1

The structure of bulk Fe4N and the side and top views of four benzene/Fe4N(001) structures. The adsorption energies (E) are labeled in Fig. 1(b).

Termination schemes and interface models

The benzene/Fe4N interfaces are modeled by placing benzene on top of the Fe4N(001) surface. The lattice structure of Fe4N allows us to have the interfaces with two types of terminations, namely, FeIIN and FeIFeII. For FeIIN termination, Fe4N surface is the plane across the body-centered site parallel to Fe4N(001). For FeIFeII termination, Fe4N surface refers to the plane across the face-centered site. For each termination scheme, we further consider two stacking models based on whether N or Fe atom, in the first layer, is right beneath the center of benzene molecule: models FeIIN-C and FeIFeII-C are named after the terminations with N or Fe atom in the Fe4N surface, locating right beneath the center of benzene molecule, whereas models FeIIN-NC and FeIFeII-NC are referring to the ones without, see Fig. 1. During the lattice structure relaxation, the atoms in the bottom layer of slab are fixed at their bulk positions, whereas other atoms are fully relaxed until the force is weaker than 0.03 eV/Å. In order to decouple adjacent slabs, a thick vacuum layer of 15 Ǻ is included in the direction perpendicular to the surface. To illustrate the nature of the spin-polarization inversion in the real space, we calculate the spin-polarization distribution by the constant-height spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy (SP-STM) simulation38.

Results and discussion

To illustrate the system, we also define the surface (inter layer, fixed layer) of Fe4N slab as I (II, III) layer, and the benzene as M layer. We call the zone above benzene as ‘benzene surface’, between benzene and Fe4N as ‘interfaces’, and atoms of I layer, in Fe4N slab, as ‘Fe4N surface’. The sites where the Fe ion located right below the C atom are defined as the top (_t) sites; the ones where the Fe ion located under the C-C bond are defined as the bridge (_b) sites. At the top or bridge sites, we call the Fe (C) atom by Fe_t (C_t) or Fe_b (C_b). The atom located right under the center of benzene is Fe_c or N_c. Figure 1(c–f) show the side and top views of the four optimized stacking models. After the structure relaxation, benzene plane is no longer flat in all models except FeIIN-NC. Especially, the hydrogen atoms in FeIIN-C and FeIFeII-NC models lie fairly further away from the slab surface than carbon atoms, agreeing with earlier reports1824. The C-C bonds become longer than those in the isolated benzene ring.

The Fe4N slab also experiences the structural changes. In both FeIIN-C and FeIFeII-NC models, the Fe_t and Fe_b atoms move out of the Fe plane of the surface, see Fig. 1(c,f). In the FeIFeII-C model, Fe_c moves up, as shown in Fig. 1(e). In the exception arises from the FeIIN-NC model, where the benzene plane is still flat, yet the C-C bonds are equal to that in the isolated benzene. The benzene plane is moving away from the Fe4N surface, as shown in Fig. 1(d). The data from our calculation is in the Table 1.

Table 1

Special bonds of different adsorbed structures comparing to the clear Fe4N surface.

Adsorbed					Clear
Bond (Ǻ)	FeIIN-C	FeIIN-NC	FeIFeII-C	FeIFeII-NC	FeIIN	FeIFeII
IL-IIL	1.674	1.636	1.772	1.834	1.701	1.706
IIL-IIIL	1.836	1.813	1.897	1.872	1.754	1.844
N-up-Fe	0.292	0.344	-	-	0.343	(Fe)0.200
M-IL	2.353	3.634	1.997	1.983	-	-
C_t-C_b	1.442	1.398	1.418	1.442	-	-
C_b-C_b	1.408	1.399	1.437	1.463	-	-
H-up-C	0.266	0	0.098	0.360	-	-
Fe_t-up-Fe	0.319	0	-	0.139	-	-
Fe_b-up-Fe	0.253	0	-	−0.05	-	-
Center-up-Fe	(N)0.140	-	(Fe)0.317	-	-	-

The bonds of isolated benzene is 1.398 Ǻ. X-up-Y means that the average vertical distance between X and Y plane. When Y = Fe, Y stands for the Fe atoms in layer I.

The adsorption energy (E) of different models is labeled in Fig. 1(b). According to the adsorption energy, 4 adsorption models fall into two categories: the endothermic adsorption (two FeIIN terminals models) and exothermic adsorption (two FeIFeII terminals models). The FeIIN-C model has the maximum adsorption energy (0.74 eV). This implies that, at high temperatures, it is the most easily formed model among the four. On the other hand, FeIFeII-NC shows an exothermic adsorption with the minimum adsorption energy (−2.14 eV), implying that its stability favours low temperatures.

The moment and charge are listed in Table 2. The charge value is calculated using Bader analysis394041. We note that the FeII moment in layer II, see the 3rd row in Table 2, is smaller than 2.29 μB in bulk Fe4N, where μB is Bohr magneton. This is due to a stronger yet more localized hybridization between N and FeII in the second layer424344. Apart from the exception in the FeII ions in layer II, in FeIFeII terminal, we observe that, while it gains more charge, the FeII moment tends to be larger than that in bulk Fe4N. But in the FeIIN terminal, this relation no longer holds; no prominent relationship between charge and moment is present.

Table 2

The average moment (Mom μB) and charge (Chg e) of four models. The charge of FeII in bulk Fe4N is 7.61 |e|.

	FeIIN-C		FeIIN-NC		FeIFeII-C		FeIFeII-NC
	Mom (μB)	Chg (e)	Mom (μB)	Chg (e)	Mom (μB)	Chg (e)	Mom (μB)	Chg (e)
I-FeII	2.302	7.466	2.294	7.463	2.497	7.756	2.540	7.729
I-N(FeI)	−0.040	6.227	−0.048	6.211	2.905	7.896	2.835	7.896
II-FeII	1.514	7.684	1.268	7.730	2.049	7.656	2.078	7.660
II-N(FeI)	2.844	7.880	2.823	7.893	−0.016	6.246	−0.016	6.243
III-FeII	2.360	7.474	2.330	7.513	2.731	7.827	2.714	7.841
III-N(FeI)	−0.039	6.293	−0.043	6.214	3.011	7.905	3.006	7.890
C_t	−0.034	4.150	0.002	4.055	0.008	4.128	−0.018	4.199
C_b	−0.010	4.127	0.002	4.071	−0.009	4.188	−0.017	4.229
H	0.001	0.920	0.000	0.934	0.003	0.918	0.003	0.901
Center	−0.061	6.228	-	-	1.955	7.484	-	-
Fe_b	2.250	7.404	2.298	7.452	2.048	7.637	2.786	7.746
Fe_t	2.296	7.368	2.298	7.453	2.073	7.639	2.372	7.537

To understand the bonding mechanisms, we analyze the charge density difference defined by , where , and are the charge densities of the full system, isolated benzene and Fe4N surface, respectively. Charge accumulation (depletion) is in yellow (blue). In the FeIIN-C model, the charge accumulates on the C-Fe bonds, as Fig. 2(a) shows. In Fig. 2(b), the interface has little charge accumulation between C and Fe ions, indicating that C atoms do not form bonds with Fe4N slab. This is consistent with the large distance between the benzene and Fe4N surface. Figure 2(c) displays a large charge accumulation in the region right below benzene in the FeIFeII-C model. In the FeIFeII-NC model, the charge depletion distributes around the centerline perpendicular to Fe4N surface, and significant charge accumulation appears around the C_t-Fe_t and C_b-Fe_b bonds, as shown in Fig. 2(d). The C atom captures only approximately 0.1 ~ 0.2|e|, suggesting the covalent characteristics of the C-Fe bonds.

Figure 2

The side and top views of charge density difference in four benzene/Fe4N(001) structures. Yellow (blue) regions represent the net charge gain (loss).

A general picture of bonding mechanism between the benzene and different Fe4N terminations can be further extracted from the spin-resolved density-of-states (DOS), as Figs. 3 and 4 show. The 3d orbitals can be divided into two classes according to the symmetry: the out-of-plane orbitals (, d + d) and the in-plane ones (). In the FeIIN-C model, for the top sites, Fe_t and d + d hybridize with C_t p in the energy interval of −4.25~−3.5 eV for both the spin-up and spin-down states. At about 2.79 eV, the hybridization is just for the spin down states. Meanwhile, the Fe_t spin-up has hybridization with C_t p at 1.80 eV.

Figure 3

The spin resolved density of states of the FeIIN-C and FeIIN-NC models.

Figure 4

The spin resolved density of states of the FeIFeII-C and FeIFeII-NC models.

For the bridge sites, we note that the spin-up and n class="Gene">spin-down π orbitals of benzene are mixed with Fe_b and d + d in −4.14~−3.5 eV energy interval, and with Fe_b spin-down d + d at 2.54 eV. Besides the strong hybridization that mentioned above, a series of hybridizations between the C p and Fe d states are drawn in Fig. 3(a). For Fe at both the top and bridge sites, its s and d orbitals, for both spin species, hybridize with the N_c p orbitals in the energy interval −7.6~−3.8 eV. The degenerated p + p orbitals of N_c hybridize with Fe in the energy interval 2.0~5.0 eV. And this hybridization between the spin-down p of C and , of Fe_t and Fe_b is fairly strong at −0.43 eV.

In Fig. 3(b) for the FeIIN-NC model, the benzene π orbitals originating from the C p orbitals do not hybridize with Fe. The slab keeps mostly the properties of a clean surface. The N p and p orbitals are degenerate. The DOS of Fe_t is almost the same as that of Fe_b. Meanwhile, the FeII d + d orbitals hybridize with the N p orbitals in the energy interval −4.1~−6.6 eV and at Fermi energy (E). The FeII and s orbitals are mixed with the degenerate N p, p orbitals at −6.6~−7.2 eV.

In the FeIFeII terminations, the intensity of local benzene π orbitals peak become weak gradually, and the peak becomes wider. Figure 4 shows the DOS of two FeIFeII terminations. In the FeIFeII-C model, Fe_c d + d hybridizes with C p at −5.1 eV, and with C p, p at −7.9 eV, as shown in Fig. 4(a). The Fe_c orbitals hybridize with C p in the energy interval −6.7~−6.3 eV. The hybridization between the Fe_c spin-up and C p is strengthened in the energy interval of 1.1 ~ 2.1 eV. At the energy level above 2.5 eV, Fe_c spin-down weakly hybridizes with C_t p.

In the FeIFeII-NC model, we see a rather weak mixture between the C_t p and Fe_t , d + d states in the interval −7.4~−6.0 eV. We note that C_t p orbitals tend to degenerate with the p orbitals, yet C_b shows no such tendency. In the interval −5.5~−4.0 eV, the prime conjugate peaks consist of Fe_b s and C_b p orbitals. At −1.75 eV, the Fe_b spin-down d + d and have hybridization with the C_b p orbitals.

We note a trend from the above hybridization schemes. As the benzene molecule moves towards the Fe4N surface, the hybridization of different orbitals depends on the termination schemes. In the FeIIN-C and FeIFeII-C models, the Fe d + d and orbitals hybridize strongly with the C p state, leading to spin-polarization inversion. In the FeIFeII-NC model, the hybridization between both spin species of the C p and Fe s, orbitals is stronger than that between C p and Fe (d + d, ), unable to reverse the spin polarization. This is consistent with the report in Ref. 17. We are thus led to conclude that the spin-polarization inversion at benzene surface is a result of hybridizations between the p orbital of C and the out-of-plane Fe d orbitals.

We show, in Fig. 5, the spatial distribution of spin-polarization P, defined asfor an energy interval of [ε, E]. is the spin-up (down) charge density in real space, at position and a distance z from the surface. Here, the value of ε is either E−0.4 eV or E  + 0.4 eV 2128. In this figure, we focus on two energy intervals, [E−0.4 eV, E] and [E, E  + 0.4 eV]. In each energy interval, the spin-polarization is projected onto the plane that is parallel to the Fe4N surface, see Fig. 5(b,c); the distance between the plane and benzene surface is labeled in Fig. 5(b). For the 4 models discussed in this work, we plot, in Fig. 5(a,d), the spin polarization along a few selected lines defined in Fig. 5(b,c).

Figure 5

Spin polarization nearby the benzene plane in the vacuum for these four models. (a) and (b) represent spin polarization distribution in [E−0.4 eV, E] energy interval; (c) and (d) represent spin-polarization distribution in [E, E + 0.4 eV] energy interval. (a)/(d) is line profiles of the spin-polarization selected in (b)/(c) for different structures, respectively. The height of the spin-polarization distribution plane relative to the benzene plane are labeled under (b) for each model.

For the FeIIN-C model, the highest spin polarization is ~80%, and the lowest value is ~−60% via line 2 and line 3, see Fig. 5(a). The intensity of inversion is much stronger than benzene adsorbed antiferromagnetic Mn26, due to the hybridization between the p states and , orbitals of Fe_t and Fe_b at −0.43 eV. This hybridization enhances the population of the spin-down species, and is thus reversing the spin polarization. It is interesting to note that the spin-polarization distributions in the energy interval [E −0.4 eV, E] and [E, E + 0.4 eV] are rather different, even with opposite signs. This suggests that the sign of spin polarization can be reversed by simply shifting the E by, for example, applying a gate voltage.

In the FeIIN-NC model, line 2 exhibits the n class="Gene">spin-polarization inversion, as shown in Fig. 5(b). The DOS, in Fig. 3(b), however, points to a weak adsorption. The spin-polarization distribution in this model is thus similar to that in vacuum (above a clean Fe4N surface). For the FeIIN-NC model, the spin polarization of line 1 with a cosine-type distribution is shown in Fig. 5(a).

In both FeIFeII terminal models, spin-polarization inversion happens, but the strong spin-polarization inversion in the neighbourhood of benzene happens only in FeIFeII-C. In FeIFeII terminations, Fe4N surface distort significantly, FeII ions are not located right above N atoms, as shown in Figs. 1(e,f). Then positive spin polarization of N atoms extends into benzene surface. In FeIFeII-C model, the most interesting feature is that the positive spin-polarization distributes along the C-C bonds, see Fig. 5(b). In Fig. 6, a positive spin polarization of benzene appears at E in the FeIFeII-C model. On the other hand, in the FeIFeII-NC model spin polarization is approximate 0%. Meanwhile spatial spin-polarization, for FeIFeII-NC, in the neighbourhood of benzene is almost 0%, see Fig. 5(b). So, the atomic scale spin-polarization, at benzene surface, is modulated by N and C atoms.

Figure 6

The spin-resolved density of states of benzene adsorbed on FeIFeII surface in the EF−1~E + 1 eV interval.

Figure 7 is the spin-polarization plane of n class="Chemical">FeIIN-C structure. It’s across the top sites and parallel to Fe4N(100). From this figure, benzene hampers the extension of N position spin polarization, and realizes the spatial spin polarization inversion. The reason is the overlap of p and out-of-plane components of d.

Figure 7

The spin-polarization distribution vertical to Fe4N surface for the FeIIN-C structure. This plane is parallel to Fe4N(100) and across the top site. The C_t atom is labeled and the value of ε is E −0.4 eV.

Conclusion

In summary, we have shown that at the spinterface formed by benzene adsorbed on Fe4N, depending on the specific termination schemes, a variety of spin polarization, including spin polarization inversion, can take place. The spin-polarization inversion finds its origin in the hybridization between the out-of-plane components of Fe d orbitals and the benzene π orbitals (the p orbital, in particular). The presence of N atoms partition the adsorption into two categories: the endothermic (adsorption) FeIIN terminal models and the exothermic FeIFeII terminal ones. With these results, we can see that adsorptions rely on the temperature. The FeIIN-C with the maximum adsorption energy will be easier to be formed than others under high temperature and has significant spin-polarization inversion, which is desired for the spintronic devices.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhang, Q. et al. Spin Polarization Inversion at n class="Chemical">Benzene-Absorbed Fe4N Surface. Sci. Rep. 5, 10602; doi: 10.1038/srep10602 (2015).