Grazia Maria Virzì1,2, Sabrina Milan Manani3,4, Alessandra Brocca3,4,5, Vincenzo Cantaluppi6, Massimo de Cal3,4, Silvia Pastori3,4,7, Ilaria Tantillo3,4, Roberto Zambon4, Carlo Crepaldi3,4, Claudio Ronco3,4. 1. IRRIV-International Renal Research Institute Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy. graziamaria.virzi@gmail.com. 2. Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant, San Bortolo Hospital, Via Rodolfi, 37 - 36100, Vicenza, Italy. graziamaria.virzi@gmail.com. 3. IRRIV-International Renal Research Institute Vicenza, Vicenza, Italy. 4. Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant, San Bortolo Hospital, Via Rodolfi, 37 - 36100, Vicenza, Italy. 5. Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua Medical School, Padua, Italy. 6. Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, Azienda Ospedaliera "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino- Presidio Molinette", University of Turin, Turin, Italy. 7. Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is present in the peritoneal effluent of stable peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, but there are no data on cfDNA in PD patients with peritonitis. We investigated the variation of peritoneal cfDNA levels subsequent to peritonitis in PD patients. METHODS: We enrolled 53 PD patients: 30 without any history of systemic inflammation or peritonitis in the last 3 months (group A) and 23 with acute peritonitis (group B). CfDNA was quantified in the peritoneal effluent. Peritoneal samples on days 1, 3, 10, 30 and until day 120 from the start of peritonitis were collected for white blood cells (WBC) count and cfDNA evaluation in group B. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of cfDNA showed significantly higher levels in group B on day 1, 3, 10 and 30 compared with group A (p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was observed between cfDNA concentration and WBC on day 1 (rho = 0.89) and day 3 (rho = 0.5) (both, p < 0.05). However, no significant correlation was observed between cfDNA and WBC on days 10 and 30. In group B, peritoneal cfDNA levels tended to progressively decline during follow-up of peritonitis. From this decreasing curve, we estimated that 49 days are necessary to reach the value of 51 genome equivalents (GE)/ml (75th percentile in controls) and 63 days to reach 31 GE/ml (median). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that cfDNA increases in peritoneal effluent of PD patients with peritonitis and tends to progressively decline in step with peritonitis resolution and membrane repair process. Peritoneal cfDNA quantification could be an innovative method to determine acute damage and an inverse index of the repair process.
BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is present in the peritoneal effluent of stable peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, but there are no data on cfDNA in PDpatients with peritonitis. We investigated the variation of peritoneal cfDNA levels subsequent to peritonitis in PDpatients. METHODS: We enrolled 53 PDpatients: 30 without any history of systemic inflammation or peritonitis in the last 3 months (group A) and 23 with acute peritonitis (group B). CfDNA was quantified in the peritoneal effluent. Peritoneal samples on days 1, 3, 10, 30 and until day 120 from the start of peritonitis were collected for white blood cells (WBC) count and cfDNA evaluation in group B. RESULTS: Quantitative analysis of cfDNA showed significantly higher levels in group B on day 1, 3, 10 and 30 compared with group A (p < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was observed between cfDNA concentration and WBC on day 1 (rho = 0.89) and day 3 (rho = 0.5) (both, p < 0.05). However, no significant correlation was observed between cfDNA and WBC on days 10 and 30. In group B, peritoneal cfDNA levels tended to progressively decline during follow-up of peritonitis. From this decreasing curve, we estimated that 49 days are necessary to reach the value of 51 genome equivalents (GE)/ml (75th percentile in controls) and 63 days to reach 31 GE/ml (median). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that cfDNA increases in peritoneal effluent of PDpatients with peritonitis and tends to progressively decline in step with peritonitis resolution and membrane repair process. Peritoneal cfDNA quantification could be an innovative method to determine acute damage and an inverse index of the repair process.
Authors: Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Judith Bernardini; Ana E Figueiredo; Amit Gupta; David W Johnson; Ed J Kuijper; Wai-Choong Lye; William Salzer; Franz Schaefer; Dirk G Struijk Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Beth Piraino; George R Bailie; Judith Bernardini; Elisabeth Boeschoten; Amit Gupta; Clifford Holmes; Ed J Kuijper; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Wai-Choong Lye; Salim Mujais; David L Paterson; Miguel Perez Fontan; Alfonso Ramos; Franz Schaefer; Linda Uttley Journal: Perit Dial Int Date: 2005 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.756
Authors: Zuzana Pös; Ondrej Pös; Jakub Styk; Angelika Mocova; Lucia Strieskova; Jaroslav Budis; Ludevit Kadasi; Jan Radvanszky; Tomas Szemes Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 5.923