Charat Thongprayoon1, Wisit Cheungpasitporn2, Narat Srivali3, Patompong Ungprasert4, Wonngarm Kittanamongkolchai2, Kianoush Kashani2,3. 1. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. charat.thongprayoon@gmail.com. 2. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. 3. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. 4. Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluid accumulation may delay recognition of acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of fluid balance on the incidence, time of AKI diagnosis and predictive performance for outcomes of critically ill patients. METHODS: This study included a cohort of 7696 adult ICU patients at Mayo Clinic Hospital in year 2011 with at least one serum creatinine (SCr) measured in ICU. AKI was defined based on SCr criterion for stage I of KDIGO definition. The AKI incidence and predictive performance for 60-day mortality was compared before and after SCr adjustment for fluid balance. RESULTS: AKI was detected in 1860 (24.2 %) before and 1947 (25.3 %) after fluid balance adjustment (P < 0.001). Patients with AKI both before and after SCr adjustment had significantly higher 60-day mortality in comparison with patients who did not develop AKI (OR 3.38; 95 % CI 2.84-4.02). The risk of 60-day mortality in patients who met AKI criteria after but not before SCr adjustment was significantly higher than patients without AKI (OR 2.00; 95 % CI 1.25-3.11). In contrast, the risk of 60-day mortality in patients who met AKI criteria before but not after SCr adjustment was similar to patients without AKI (OR 1.19; 95 % CI 0.48-2.50). The C-statistic for unadjusted and adjusted SCr to predict 60-day mortality were 0.68 and 0.70, respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study found that SCr adjustment for fluid balance could result in a more accurate detection of AKI cases. We suggest using fluid balance adjustment for volume overload critically ill patients.
BACKGROUND: Fluid accumulation may delay recognition of acute kidney injury (AKI) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. This study aims to evaluate the impact of fluid balance on the incidence, time of AKI diagnosis and predictive performance for outcomes of critically illpatients. METHODS: This study included a cohort of 7696 adult ICU patients at Mayo Clinic Hospital in year 2011 with at least one serum creatinine (SCr) measured in ICU. AKI was defined based on SCr criterion for stage I of KDIGO definition. The AKI incidence and predictive performance for 60-day mortality was compared before and after SCr adjustment for fluid balance. RESULTS: AKI was detected in 1860 (24.2 %) before and 1947 (25.3 %) after fluid balance adjustment (P < 0.001). Patients with AKI both before and after SCr adjustment had significantly higher 60-day mortality in comparison with patients who did not develop AKI (OR 3.38; 95 % CI 2.84-4.02). The risk of 60-day mortality in patients who met AKI criteria after but not before SCr adjustment was significantly higher than patients without AKI (OR 2.00; 95 % CI 1.25-3.11). In contrast, the risk of 60-day mortality in patients who met AKI criteria before but not after SCr adjustment was similar to patients without AKI (OR 1.19; 95 % CI 0.48-2.50). The C-statistic for unadjusted and adjusted SCr to predict 60-day mortality were 0.68 and 0.70, respectively (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study found that SCr adjustment for fluid balance could result in a more accurate detection of AKI cases. We suggest using fluid balance adjustment for volume overload critically illpatients.
Authors: Etienne Macedo; Josée Bouchard; Sharon H Soroko; Glenn M Chertow; Jonathan Himmelfarb; T Alp Ikizler; Emil P Paganini; Ravindra L Mehta Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-05-06 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Nor'azim Mohd Yunos; Rinaldo Bellomo; Colin Hegarty; David Story; Lisa Ho; Michael Bailey Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrea Lassnigg; Daniel Schmidlin; Mohamed Mouhieddine; Lucas M Bachmann; Wilfred Druml; Peter Bauer; Michael Hiesmayr Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Jay L Koyner; Michael R Bennett; Elaine M Worcester; Qing Ma; Jai Raman; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Kristen E Kasza; Michael F O'Connor; David J Konczal; Sharon Trevino; Prasad Devarajan; Patrick T Murray Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2008-07-23 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Lars Englberger; Rakesh M Suri; Zhuo Li; Edward T Casey; Richard C Daly; Joseph A Dearani; Hartzell V Schaff Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Ravindra L Mehta; John A Kellum; Sudhir V Shah; Bruce A Molitoris; Claudio Ronco; David G Warnock; Adeera Levin Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Kianoush Kashani; Ali Al-Khafaji; Thomas Ardiles; Antonio Artigas; Sean M Bagshaw; Max Bell; Azra Bihorac; Robert Birkhahn; Cynthia M Cely; Lakhmir S Chawla; Danielle L Davison; Thorsten Feldkamp; Lui G Forni; Michelle Ng Gong; Kyle J Gunnerson; Michael Haase; James Hackett; Patrick M Honore; Eric A J Hoste; Olivier Joannes-Boyau; Michael Joannidis; Patrick Kim; Jay L Koyner; Daniel T Laskowitz; Matthew E Lissauer; Gernot Marx; Peter A McCullough; Scott Mullaney; Marlies Ostermann; Thomas Rimmelé; Nathan I Shapiro; Andrew D Shaw; Jing Shi; Amy M Sprague; Jean-Louis Vincent; Christophe Vinsonneau; Ludwig Wagner; Michael G Walker; R Gentry Wilkerson; Kai Zacharowski; John A Kellum Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Renato A Caires; Regina C R M Abdulkader; Verônica T Costa E Silva; Gillene S Ferreira; Emmanuel A Burdmann; Luis Yu; Etienne Macedo Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2015-08-23 Impact factor: 3.902
Authors: Bolanle A Omotoso; Emaad M Abdel-Rahman; Wenjun Xin; Jennie Z Ma; Kenneth W Scully; Fatiu A Arogundade; Rasheed A Balogun Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 3.902