Literature DB >> 26011602

Manganese Fractionation Using a Sequential Extraction Method to Evaluate Welders' Shielded Metal Arc Welding Exposures During Construction Projects in Oil Refineries.

Kevin W Hanley1, Ronnee Andrews2, Steven Bertke1, Kevin Ashley2.   

Abstract

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has conducted an occupational exposure assessment study of manganese (Mn) in welding fume of construction workers rebuilding tanks, piping, and process equipment at two oil refineries. The objective of this study was to evaluate exposures to different Mn fractions using a sequential extraction procedure. Seventy-two worker-days were monitored for either total or respirable Mn during stick welding and associated activities both within and outside of confined spaces. The samples were analyzed using an experimental method to separate different Mn fractions by valence states based on selective chemical solubility. The full-shift total particulate Mn time-weighted average (TWA) breathing zone concentrations ranged from 0.013-29 for soluble Mn in a mild ammonium acetate solution; from 0.26-250 for Mn(0,2+) in acetic acid; from non-detectable (ND) - 350 for Mn(3+,4+) in hydroxylamine-hydrochloride; and from ND - 39 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m(3)) for insoluble Mn fractions in hydrochloric and nitric acid. The summation of all Mn fractions in total particulate TWA ranged from 0.52-470 μg/m(3). The range of respirable particulate Mn TWA concentrations were from 0.20-28 for soluble Mn; from 1.4-270 for Mn(0,2+); from 0.49-150 for Mn(3+,4+); from ND - 100 for insoluble Mn; and from 2.0-490 μg/m(3) for Mn (sum of fractions). For all jobs combined, total particulate TWA GM concentrations of the Mn(sum) were 99 (GSD = 3.35) and 8.7 (GSD = 3.54) μg/m(3) for workers inside and outside of confined spaces; respirable Mn also showed much higher levels for welders within confined spaces. Regardless of particle size and confined space work status, Mn(0,2+) fraction was the most abundant followed by Mn(3+,4+) fraction, typically >50% and ∼30-40% of Mn(sum), respectively. Eighteen welders' exposures exceeded the ACGIH Threshold Limit Values for total Mn (100 μg/m(3)) and 25 exceeded the recently adopted respirable Mn TLV (20 μg/m(3)). This study shows that a welding fume exposure control and management program is warranted, especially for welding jobs in confined spaces.

Entities:  

Keywords:  construction; manganese fractionation; petroleum refineries; shielded metal arc welding (SMAW); stick welding; welding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011602      PMCID: PMC4658655          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2015.1047022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  34 in total

1.  Analysis of lognormally distributed exposure data with repeated measures and values below the limit of detection using SAS.

Authors:  Yan Jin; Misty J Hein; James A Deddens; Cynthia J Hines
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2010-12-20

Review 2.  Are there common biochemical and molecular mechanisms controlling manganism and parkisonism.

Authors:  Jerome A Roth
Journal:  Neuromolecular Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 3.843

3.  Manganese exposure: neuropsychological and neurological symptoms and effects in welders.

Authors:  Rosemarie M Bowler; Sabine Gysens; Emily Diamond; Sanae Nakagawa; Marija Drezgic; Harry A Roels
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Dose-effect relationships between manganese exposure and neurological, neuropsychological and pulmonary function in confined space bridge welders.

Authors:  Rosemarie M Bowler; Harry A Roels; Sanae Nakagawa; Marija Drezgic; Emily Diamond; Robert Park; William Koller; Russell P Bowler; Donna Mergler; Maryse Bouchard; Donald Smith; Roberto Gwiazda; Richard L Doty
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Manganese exposures during shielded metal arc welding (SMAW) in an enclosed space.

Authors:  Michael K Harris; William M Ewing; William Longo; Christopher DePasquale; Michael D Mount; Richard Hatfield; Randall Stapleton
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 6.  Fate of manganese associated with the inhalation of welding fumes: potential neurological effects.

Authors:  James M Antonini; Annette B Santamaria; Neil T Jenkins; Elisa Albini; Roberto Lucchini
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 7.  Searching for a relationship between manganese and welding and Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Joseph Jankovic
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 8.  State-of-the-science review: Does manganese exposure during welding pose a neurological risk?

Authors:  Annette B Santamaria; Colleen A Cushing; James M Antonini; Brent L Finley; Fionna S Mowat
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.393

Review 9.  Manganese: recent advances in understanding its transport and neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Michael Aschner; Tomás R Guilarte; Jay S Schneider; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 4.219

10.  Critical evaluation of sequential leaching procedures for the determination of Ni and Mn species in welding fumes.

Authors:  B Berlinger; M Náray; I Sajó; G Záray
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-03-24
View more
  2 in total

1.  Physicochemical properties of air discharge-generated manganese oxide nanoparticles: Comparison to welding fumes.

Authors:  Larissa V Stebounova; Natalia I Gonzalez-Pech; Thomas M Peters; Vicki H Grassian
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2018-01-15

2.  Exploring Manganese Fractionation Using a Sequential Extraction Method to Evaluate Welders' Gas Metal Arc Welding Exposures during Heavy Equipment Manufacturing.

Authors:  Kevin W Hanley; Ronnee Andrews; Steven Bertke; Kevin Ashley
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.179

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.