Literature DB >> 26011573

Test ordering in an evidence free zone: Rates and associations of Australian general practice trainees' vitamin D test ordering.

Amanda Tapley1, Parker Magin1,2, Simon Morgan1, Kim Henderson1, John Scott1, Allison Thomson2, Neil Spike3,4, Lawrie McArthur5, Mieke van Driel6, Patrick McElduff7, Billie Bonevski8.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Indiscriminate health screening is increasingly seen as being problematic. In particular, vitamin D testing rates are increasing rapidly despite recommendations against population screening. The purpose of this study was to determine the level of vitamin D testing among family practice/general practitioner (GP) trainees and to establish associations of this testing.
METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of data from the ReCEnT (Registrars Clinical Encounters in Training) cohort study. The setting was GP practices in four Australian states. Data from 60 consecutive consultations per trainee were recorded each 6-month training term (up to four terms).
RESULTS: Vitamin D tests were ordered in 726 (1.0%) of encounters (n = 69 412). Vitamin D test ordering was significantly associated with patients being older, female and non-English speaking. Trainees were more likely to test if they worked in a completely bulk-billing practice (i.e. a practice without any patient payment), if more problems were dealt with, more pathology tests were ordered in the consultation and if a lipid profile was ordered. They were less likely to test if they sought in-consultation advice or information. The most common reasons for testing were 'check-up' and 'health maintenance'.
CONCLUSIONS: In this first report of associations of vitamin D testing in the GP setting, we found that non-targeted vitamin D testing (testing inconsistent with current guidelines) is widespread in GP trainees' practice. Adoption of more rational testing approaches is needed.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Family Practice; General Practice; Testing; Trainees; Vitamin D; evidence-based medicine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011573     DOI: 10.1111/jep.12322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  5 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for Secondary Prevention of Nutritional Deficiencies in High-Risk Groups in High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Maaike J Bruins; Julia K Bird; Claude P Aebischer; Manfred Eggersdorfer
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 2.  Clinical Management of Low Vitamin D: A Scoping Review of Physicians' Practices.

Authors:  Michelle Rockwell; Vivica Kraak; Matthew Hulver; John Epling
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Changes to the frequency and appropriateness of vitamin D testing after the introduction of new Medicare criteria for rebates in Australian general practice: evidence from 1.5 million patients in the NPS MedicineInsight database.

Authors:  David Gonzalez-Chica; Nigel Stocks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Investigating causality in the association between vitamin D status and self-reported tiredness.

Authors:  Alexandra Havdahl; Ruth Mitchell; Lavinia Paternoster; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Health, financial and environmental impacts of unnecessary vitamin D testing: a triple bottom line assessment adapted for healthcare.

Authors:  Matilde Breth-Petersen; Katy Bell; Kristen Pickles; Forbes McGain; Scott McAlister; Alexandra Barratt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 3.006

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.