OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of radiation-reduction measures implemented during pediatric catheterization, and provide data on the radiation doses for common interventional and diagnostic procedures, indexed to body weight. BACKGROUND: Ionizing radiation exposure must be minimized to "as low as reasonably achievable," by instituting radiation-limiting techniques and knowledge of expected radiation exposure. METHODS: Radiation-reduction measures included pulsed-fluoroscopy at 7.5 pulses/second (0.032-0.045 µGy/pulse), an air-gap magnification technique for children<20 kg, operator awareness, and additional exposure reduction techniques through projection optimization. Radiation doses for procedures performed between 2007 through 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, including dose area product (DAP) and DAP/kg of body weight for 25 procedural types. Median doses were compared with those previously published from other large centers and multi-institutional databases and assessed for changes over time. RESULTS: Reviewed were 5,196 cases, which included 2,819 interventional, 710 endomyocardial biopsies and 1,667 diagnostic studies, documenting a significant difference in exposure between various procedures and body weights. The absolute exposure was significantly greater in larger children (e.g., for ductal closure median DAP/kg: 17 µGy*m2/kg 10-20 kg children vs. 37 µGy*m2 /kg for those>30 kg, P<0.001). Dose exposure using radiation-reduction techniques were the lowest reported in the literature for all procedure types compared (e.g. median DAP for pulmonary valvuloplasty 163 µGy*m2 vs. 405 to 1,230 µGy*m2 reported by 3 large centers). Reduction of fluoroscopy acquisition to 7.5 pulses/second nearly halved radiation exposure (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a radiation dose reduction and awareness program can lead to documented reduction in exposure, across a variety of procedures performed by multiple operators.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of radiation-reduction measures implemented during pediatric catheterization, and provide data on the radiation doses for common interventional and diagnostic procedures, indexed to body weight. BACKGROUND:Ionizing radiation exposure must be minimized to "as low as reasonably achievable," by instituting radiation-limiting techniques and knowledge of expected radiation exposure. METHODS: Radiation-reduction measures included pulsed-fluoroscopy at 7.5 pulses/second (0.032-0.045 µGy/pulse), an air-gap magnification technique for children<20 kg, operator awareness, and additional exposure reduction techniques through projection optimization. Radiation doses for procedures performed between 2007 through 2014 were retrospectively reviewed, including dose area product (DAP) and DAP/kg of body weight for 25 procedural types. Median doses were compared with those previously published from other large centers and multi-institutional databases and assessed for changes over time. RESULTS: Reviewed were 5,196 cases, which included 2,819 interventional, 710 endomyocardial biopsies and 1,667 diagnostic studies, documenting a significant difference in exposure between various procedures and body weights. The absolute exposure was significantly greater in larger children (e.g., for ductal closure median DAP/kg: 17 µGy*m2/kg 10-20 kg children vs. 37 µGy*m2 /kg for those>30 kg, P<0.001). Dose exposure using radiation-reduction techniques were the lowest reported in the literature for all procedure types compared (e.g. median DAP for pulmonary valvuloplasty 163 µGy*m2 vs. 405 to 1,230 µGy*m2 reported by 3 large centers). Reduction of fluoroscopy acquisition to 7.5 pulses/second nearly halved radiation exposure (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a radiation dose reduction and awareness program can lead to documented reduction in exposure, across a variety of procedures performed by multiple operators.