Literature DB >> 26011432

Perfusion pressure and blood flow determine microvascular apparent viscosity.

Ozlem Yalcin1,2, Daniel Ortiz2, Alexander T Williams2, Paul C Johnson2, Pedro Cabrales2.   

Abstract

NEW
FINDINGS: What is the central question of this study? The aim was to evaluate the effect of perfusion pressure on blood flow in small arterioles. The hypothesis was that blood flow regulates the thickness of the red-cell-free layer and, therefore, blood flow determines blood apparent viscosity and local vascular resistance in vascular networks with limited myogenic or metabolic regulation of blood flow. What is the main finding and its importance? Reduced perfusion pressures lowered volumetric flow rates and increased local vascular resistance, due to increased blood apparent viscosity. Thus, the local vascular resistance of small arterioles with limited myogenic or metabolic regulation of blood flow, appeared to be determined by changes in blood rheology rather than blood vessel diameter. The study of blood flow regulation is important to understand and resolve pathological conditions. As blood is a complex non-Newtonian multiphase system, the foundations of blood rheological properties have been obtained mostly in viscometers. However, blood rheological behaviour in vivo depends on the concentration of red blood cells (RBCs), their mechanical properties and the RBC hydrodynamics, including RBC migration away from the vessel wall in shear flow. This migration promotes the formation of a RBC-depleted zone, or cell-free layer (CFL), which reduces the apparent viscosity of blood. We hypothesize that perfusion pressure determines blood apparent viscosity in microvessels, as shear rate affects axial migration of RBCs by influencing the CFL thickness. In this study, we analysed the effects of perfusion pressure on blood flow in individual arterioles within the rat cremaster muscle preparation. Perfusion pressures to this microvascular bed were controlled by occlusions of the iliac artery using a pressure cuff. Blood flow measurements were obtained from direct measurements of blood flow velocity profile, as well as determination of CFL thickness using intravital microscopy. Our results indicate that perfusion pressure determines shear rates and the CFL thickness and its variations. In addition, blood flow reduction increased local vascular resistance by augmenting blood apparent viscosity rather than vascular hindrance. In conclusion, blood rheology could act as an intrinsic mechanism to further limit blood flow to tissue with limited myogenic and metabolic responses at low perfusion pressures.
© 2015 The Authors. Experimental Physiology © 2015 The Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011432      PMCID: PMC6361618          DOI: 10.1113/EP085101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  27 in total

1.  Effect of aggregation and shear rate on the dispersion of red blood cells flowing in venules.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Bishop; Aleksander S Popel; Marcos Intaglietta; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  Blood viscosity in tube flow: dependence on diameter and hematocrit.

Authors:  A R Pries; D Neuhaus; P Gaehtgens
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-12

Review 3.  Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  Yi-Shuan J Li; Jason H Haga; Shu Chien
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  A computer-based method for determination of the cell-free layer width in microcirculation.

Authors:  Sangho Kim; Robert L Kong; Aleksander S Popel; Marcos Intaglietta; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2006 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Directional shear flow and Rho activation prevent the endothelial cell apoptosis induced by micropatterned anisotropic geometry.

Authors:  Chia-Ching Wu; Yi-Shuan Li; Jason H Haga; Roland Kaunas; Jeng-Jiann Chiu; Fong-Chin Su; Shunichi Usami; Shu Chien
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Temporal and spatial variations of cell-free layer width in arterioles.

Authors:  Sangho Kim; Robert L Kong; Aleksander S Popel; Marcos Intaglietta; Paul C Johnson
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Comparison of blood viscosity using a torsional oscillation viscometer and a rheometer.

Authors:  Valter Travagli; Iacopo Zanardi; Letizia Boschi; Alessandro Gabbrielli; Vita A M Mastronuzzi; Roberto Cappelli; Sandro Forconi
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  In vivo correlates of altered blood rheology.

Authors:  Oguz K Baskurt
Journal:  Biorheology       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  Microvascular experimental evidence on the relative significance of restoring oxygen carrying capacity vs. blood viscosity in shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Beatriz Y Salazar Vázquez; Reto Wettstein; Pedro Cabrales; Amy G Tsai; Marcos Intaglietta
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-05-04

10.  Effects of erythrocyte deformability and aggregation on the cell free layer and apparent viscosity of microscopic blood flows.

Authors:  Junfeng Zhang; Paul C Johnson; Aleksander S Popel
Journal:  Microvasc Res       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.514

View more
  3 in total

1.  A droplet-based microfluidic viscometer for the measurement of blood coagulation.

Authors:  Sarah E Mena; Yunzi Li; Joseph McCormick; Brendan McCracken; Carmen Colmenero; Kevin Ward; Mark A Burns
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  A Review of Suspension-Scattered Particles Used in Blood-Mimicking Fluid for Doppler Ultrasound Imaging.

Authors:  Ammar A Oglat; Nursakinah Suardi; M Z Matjafri; Mohammad A Oqlat; Mostafa A Abdelrahman; Ahmad A Oqlat
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2018-05-07

Review 3.  Facing Time in Ischemic Stroke: An Alternative Hypothesis for Collateral Failure.

Authors:  M Pham; M Bendszus
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.649

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.