Literature DB >> 26011404

Forty years of quality-of-life research in congenital heart disease: Temporal trends in conceptual and methodological rigor.

Ewa-Lena Bratt1, Philip Moons2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The first study on quality of life (QoL) in patients with congenital heart disease was published 40 years ago. Since then, the number of QoL articles on these patients has grown exponentially. We conducted a systematic literature review of all empirical studies on QoL in patients with congenital heart disease published since 1974, with the aim of determining the range of conceptual and methodological rigor of studies and identifying temporal trends in these parameters.
METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cinahl were searched for empirical studies addressing QoL in children, adolescents, or adults with congenital heart disease, published between January 1, 1974, and December 31, 2014. We applied 10 review criteria that were previously developed by Gill and Feinstein in 1994 and further refined by Moons et al. in 2004. Overall, 234 articles were reviewed.
RESULTS: We found slight but non-significant temporal improvements in conceptual and methodological rigor and in use of assessment methods. This indicates a trend toward a more professional and exacting approach in QoL assessments. However, the majority of articles still had substantial conceptual and methodological deficits. Furthermore, we observed that citation of the publications of Gill and Feinstein and Moons et al. in published QoL research is associated with higher quality scores, suggesting that these articles have a positive impact on conceptual and methodological caliber.
CONCLUSION: Despite 40 years of QoL research in this field, this review shows that major weaknesses in methodological rigor remain highly prevalent, which may make QoL studies inconclusive.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent; Congenital; Health services research/methods; Heart defect; Quality of life; Review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011404     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.05.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  11 in total

1.  Medical factors that predict quality of life for young adults with congenital heart disease: What matters most?

Authors:  Jamie L Jackson; Lauren Hassen; Gina M Gerardo; Kathryn Vannatta; Curt J Daniels
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Quality of life: an underutilized patient-reported outcome for adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sameh M Said; Joseph A Dearani
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Quality of life in adults living with congenital heart disease: beyond morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Amanda L Hunter; Lorna Swan
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Impact of marital status and comorbid disorders on health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ann Kristin Bjørnnes; Monica Parry; Ragnhild Falk; Judy Watt-Watson; Irene Lie; Marit Leegaard
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Evaluation of quality of life in patients with congenital heart disease: an observational case control study.

Authors:  Efrén Martínez-Quintana; Hiurma Estupiñán-León; Ana Beatriz Rojas-Brito; Liuva Déniz-Déniz; Alejandro Barreto-Martín; Fayna Rodríguez-González
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 6.  A systematic review on quality of life (QoL) of patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) who underwent pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).

Authors:  Zhenyue Li; Louis Choon Kit Wong; Rehena Sultana; Hui Jun Lim; Joey Wee-Shan Tan; Qiu Xuan Tan; Jolene Si Min Wong; Claramae Shulyn Chia; Chin-Ann Johnny Ong
Journal:  Pleura Peritoneum       Date:  2022-04-21

7.  Perceptions of Disease-Related Stress: A Key to Better Understanding Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Survivors of Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Jamie L Jackson; Gina M Gerardo; Curt J Daniels; Kathryn Vannatta
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.083

8.  A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences.

Authors:  K Haraldstad; A Wahl; R Andenæs; J R Andersen; M H Andersen; E Beisland; C R Borge; E Engebretsen; M Eisemann; L Halvorsrud; T A Hanssen; A Haugstvedt; T Haugland; V A Johansen; M H Larsen; L Løvereide; B Løyland; L G Kvarme; P Moons; T M Norekvål; L Ribu; G E Rohde; K H Urstad; S Helseth
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The Interaction Effect of Gender and Residential Environment, Individual Resources, and Needs Satisfaction on Quality of Life Among Older Adults in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Ben Chi-Pun Liu; Dion Sik-Yee Leung; Julia Warrener
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2019-09-24

10.  'Well-being paradox' revisited: a cross-sectional study of quality of life in over 4000 adults with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Caroline Sophie Andonian; Sebastian Freilinger; Stephan Achenbach; Peter Ewert; Ulrike Gundlach; Jürgen Hoerer; Harald Kaemmerer; Lars Pieper; Michael Weyand; Rhoia Clara Neidenbach; Jürgen Beckmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.