Literature DB >> 26011331

Associated risk factor analysis for positive resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection in early-stage gastric cancer.

Jing Wen1, En-Qiang Linghu, Yun-Sheng Yang, Qing-Sen Liu, Jing Yang, Zhong-Sheng Lu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the associated risk factors and the prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of early-stage gastric cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed on 319 consecutive lesions in 316 patients who underwent ESD. Age, gender, surgeons, lesion location, maximum diameter of resected specimens, macroscopic type, depth of tumor invasion and tumor differentiation were evaluated as potential risk factors.
RESULTS: A total of 27 (8.5%) patients exhibited positive resection margins after ESD. Among 25 successfully followed-up patients 13 were subjected to gastrectomy, 1 was administered chemotherapy, 2 underwent additional endoscopic resection and 9, who were initially followed-up during a median period of 11.7 months (range 1-40), had neither recurrence nor metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that age, lesion location, depth of tumor invasion, macroscopic type and tumor differentiation were correlated with positive resection margin. By contrast, multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only age, tumor differentiation and depth of tumor invasion were independent risk factors of positive resection margins.
CONCLUSION: Age, tumor differentiation and depth of tumor invasion were independent risk factors for post-ESD positive resection margins. This result suggests that older patients, undifferentiated lesions and a greater depth of invasion increase the risk for post-ESD positive resection margins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J BUON        ISSN: 1107-0625            Impact factor:   2.533


  4 in total

1.  Investigation of each histological type in undifferentiated early gastric cancer and validity of diagnosis of the disease range.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Yoshifuku; Yoji Sanomura; Shiro Oka; Shinji Tanaka; Kazuaki Chayama
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Margin Positivity in Resectable Esophageal Cancer: Are there Modifiable Risk Factors?

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Rhami Khorfan; David D Odell; Ryan P Merkow; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Associated risk factor analysis and the prognostic impact of positive resection margins after endoscopic resection in early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong Feng; Wei Wei; Shuo Guo; Bao-Qing Li
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 2.751

4.  Effect of FOLFOX4 combined with Brucea javanica emulsion on VEGF in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zheng Chen; Zhenyu Zhou; Zhigang Hu; Qiaodong Xu; Jie Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.967

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.