Literature DB >> 26011204

Screening of nutritional risk and nutritional support in general surgery patients: a survey from Shanghai, China.

Zhen-Yi Jia1, Jun Yang, Da-Nian Tong, Jia-Yuan Peng, Zhong-Wei Zhang, Wei-Jie Liu, Yang Xia, Huan-long Qin.   

Abstract

To determine the prevalence of nutritional risk in surgical departments and to evaluate the impact of nutritional support on clinical outcomes. The nutritional risk in different surgical diseases and the different way of nutritional support on clinical outcomes in patients at nutritional risk remain unclear. Hospitalized patients from general surgical departments were screened using the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 questionnaire on admission. Data were collected on nutritional risk, complications, and length of stay (LOS). Overall, 5034 patients were recruited; the overall prevalence of nutritional risk on admission were 19.2%. The highest prevalence was found among patients with gastric cancer. At-risk patients had more complications and longer LOS than nonrisk patients. Of the at-risk patients, the complication rate was significantly lower and LOS was significantly shorter in the nutritional-support group than in the no-support group (20.9 versus 30.0%, P < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed reduced complication rates and LOS only in patients with gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) cancer. Significantly lower complication rates relative to nonsupported patients were found among patients who received enteral nutrition or who received support for 5 to 7 days, or daily support entailing 16 to 25 kcal/kg of nonprotein energy. Different surgical diseases have different levels of nutritional risk. The provision of nutritional support was associated with a lower complication rate and a shorter LOS for gastric, colorectal, and HPB cancer patients at nutritional risk. The improper use of nutritional support may not improve outcomes for at-risk patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Length of stay; Nutritional risk screening 2002; Nutritional support; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26011204      PMCID: PMC4452972          DOI: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00245.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Surg        ISSN: 0020-8868


  17 in total

1.  American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: parenteral nutrition.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Jens Kondrup; Henrik Højgaard Rasmussen; Ole Hamberg; Zeno Stanga
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 7.324

3.  ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002.

Authors:  J Kondrup; S P Allison; M Elia; B Vellas; M Plauth
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.324

4.  Evidence supports nutritional support.

Authors:  H Lochs; C Pichard; S P Allison
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 7.324

5.  Introductory to the ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Terminology, definitions and general topics.

Authors:  H Lochs; S P Allison; R Meier; M Pirlich; J Kondrup; St Schneider; G van den Berghe; C Pichard
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 7.324

6.  Perioperative total parenteral nutrition in surgical patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Nutritional approach in malnourished surgical patients: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Giovanni Radaelli; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-02

9.  A randomised controlled trial evaluating the use of enteral nutritional supplements postoperatively in malnourished surgical patients.

Authors:  A H Beattie; A T Prach; J P Baxter; C R Pennington
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  The influence of nutritional status on complications after major intraabdominal surgery.

Authors:  Hülya Sungurtekin; Uğur Sungurtekin; Canan Balci; Mehmet Zencir; Ergün Erdem
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.