Literature DB >> 26010724

Trans-subclavian versus transapical access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A multicenter study.

Cristina Ciuca1, Giuseppe Tarantini2, Azeem Latib3,4, Valeria Gasparetto2, Carlo Savini5, Marco Di Eusanio5, Massimo Napodano2, Francesco Maisano6, Gino Gerosa2, Alessandro Sticchi3,4, Antonio Marzocchi1, Ottavio Alfieri6, Antonio Colombo3,4, Francesco Saia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of trans-subclavian (TS) and transapical (TA) access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
BACKGROUND: A considerable proportion of patients undergoing TAVI are not eligible for transfemoral approach. To date, there are few data to guide the choice between alternative vascular access routes.
METHODS: Among 874 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI, 202 procedures were performed through TA (n = 142, 70.3%) or TS (n = 60, 29.7%) access. Medtronic Corevalve (CV, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) was implanted in 17.3% of the patients, the Edwards-Sapien (ES, Edwards Lifesciences Inc., Irvine, CA) in 81.2% and other prostheses in 0.1%. In-hospital and long-term outcome were assessed using the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 definitions.
RESULTS: Mean age was 82 ± 6 years, STS score 9.3 ± 7.9%. The 2 groups showed a relevant imbalance in baseline characteristics. In hospital mortality was 6.4% (1.7% TS vs. 8.4% TA, P = 0.06), stroke 2.0%, acute myocardial infarction 1.0%, acute kidney injury 39.4%, sepsis 4.0% with no significant differences between groups, while bleeding was more frequent in TA patients (53.5% vs. 11.7% TS, P < 0.001). One- and 2-year survival was 85.2% and 73.2% in TS patients, and 83.9% and 74.9% in TA patients (P = ns for both). Access site was not an independent predictor of mortality at multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSION: Transapical compared with trans-subclavian access for TAVI was associated with a nonsignificant trend to increased periprocedural events. However, 1- and 2-year survival appears similar.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic stenosis; outcome; transcatheter aortic valve replacement; vascular access

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26010724     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  13 in total

1.  Transcaval Access and Closure for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Prospective Investigation.

Authors:  Adam B Greenbaum; Vasilis C Babaliaros; Marcus Y Chen; Annette M Stine; Toby Rogers; William W O'Neill; Gaetano Paone; Vinod H Thourani; Kamran I Muhammad; Robert A Leonardi; Stephen Ramee; James F Troendle; Robert J Lederman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Alternate Access for TAVI: Stay Clear of the Chest.

Authors:  Pavel Overtchouk; Thomas Modine
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2018-09

3.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the left axillary artery route in a patient with a permanent pacemaker: The first transaxillary artery route experience with a Meril's MyvalTM transaortic valve in Turkey.

Authors:  Telat Keleş; Özlem Özcan Çelebi; Emrah Uğuz; Kevser Balcı; Engin Bozkurt
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.596

Review 4.  Trans-subclavian approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Daniel Richard Watson; Steven Joseph Yakubov; Jefferson Morton Lyons; Carlos Enrique Sanchez Soto; Nathan Howard Kander; Anthony Theodore Chapekis; Arash Arshi; Aref Mahmoud Abou-Amro; Geoffrey B Blossom
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-09

Review 5.  A Review of Alternative Access for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Michael N Young; Vikas Singh; Rahul Sakhuja
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-07-04

Review 6.  Access Options for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Unfavorable Aortoiliofemoral Anatomy.

Authors:  Jayendrakumar S Patel; Amar Krishnaswamy; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; Stephanie Mick; Samir R Kapadia
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  A meta-analysis comparing transaxillary and transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Yong Zhan; Siavash Saadat; Avneet Soin; Masashi Kawabori; Frederick Y Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  The Transaxillary Approach via Prosthetic Conduit for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the New-Generation Balloon-Expandable Valves in Patients With Severe Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  Alexander Lind; Alina Zubarevich; Arjang Ruhparwar; Matthias Totzeck; Rolf Alexander Jánosi; Tienush Rassaf; Fadi Al-Rashid
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-13

9.  Supraclavicular Subclavian access for Sapien Transcatheter aortic valve replacement- a novel approach.

Authors:  Thom G Dahle; Nathaniel J Castro; Brian M Stegman; Jacob R Dutcher; John M Teskey; Wade T Schmidt; Daren S Danielson; Sara J Dezell; Virginia B Daniels; Daniel J Tiede
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Evolution of transcatheter aortic valve implantation over 7 years: results of a prospective single-centre registry of 2000 patients in a large municipal hospital (TAVIK Registry).

Authors:  Gerhard Schymik; Valentin Herzberger; Jens Bergmann; Peter Bramlage; Lars O Conzelmann; Alexander Würth; Armin Luik; Holger Schröfel; Panagiotis Tzamalis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.