| Literature DB >> 26010327 |
Lance M Bollinger1,2,3,4, Jonathan J S Powell1, Joseph A Houmard1,4, Carol A Witczak1,2,3,4, Jeffrey J Brault1,2,3,4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Whole-body protein metabolism is dysregulated with obesity. The goal of the study was to determine whether activity and expression of major protein degradation pathways are compromised specifically in human skeletal muscle with obesity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26010327 PMCID: PMC4445474 DOI: 10.1002/oby.21081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) ISSN: 1930-7381 Impact factor: 5.002
Primers used for RT-PCR
| Gene | Sequence (5' → 3’) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| TGF-β pathway | Myostatin | Fwd | AAGACCAAAATCCCTTCTGGA |
| Rev | CTGTAACCTTCCCAGGACCA | ||
| SMAD2 | Fwd | TGTTCTTACCAAAGGCAGCA | |
| Rev | CATCGGAAGAGGAAGGAACA | ||
| SMAD3 | Fwd | GTAGCTCGTGGTGGCTGTG | |
| Rev | AACACCAAGTGCATCACCAT | ||
| Ubiquitin- | FoxO3 | Fwd | CTCTTGCCAGTTCCCTCATT |
| Rev | CTTCAAGGATAAGGGCGACA | ||
| Atrogin-1 | Fwd | TCAGGGATGTGAGCTGTGAC | |
| Rev | GGGGGAAGCTTTCAACAGAC | ||
| MuRF-1 | Fwd | CTTCGTGCTCCTTGCACAT | |
| Rev | ATCGTCACGGAGTGTACGG | ||
| Autophagy | LC3B | Fwd | TATCACCGGGATTTTGGTTG |
| Rev | GAGAAGACCTTCAAGCAGCG | ||
| ATG4B | Fwd | AGTATCCAAACGGGCTCTGA | |
| Rev | ACTGGGAAGATGGACGCAG | ||
| Gabarapl-1 | Fwd | TGGCTTTTGGAGCCTTCTCT | |
| Rev | CCATCCCTTTGAGTATCGGA | ||
| Control | RPLPO | Fwd | AGGCGTCCTCGTGGAAGTGACA |
| Rev | TGCTGCATCTGCTTGGAGCCC | ||
Subject characteristics
| Lean (n = 10) | Obese (n = 8) | |
|---|---|---|
| BMI, kg/m2 | 22.9 ± 0.8 | 46.9 ± 2.1 |
| Height, cm | 164.3 ± 2.0 | 166.9 ± 2.5 |
| Mass, kg | 61.9 ± 2.3 | 130.4 ± 9.9 |
| Age, y | 24.2 ± 1.5 | 34.1 ± 3.3 |
| Fasting glucose, (mg/dl) | 85.2 ± 2.6 | 93.7 ± 2.9 |
| Fasting insulin (µIU/ml) | 9.3 ± 1.1 | 18.2 ± 2.2 |
| HOMA-IR | 1.65 ± 0.2 | 4.27 ± 0.6 |
Data presented as mean ± SEM.
Significantly different from lean (P < 0.05).
Figure 1(a) Total protein was separated by high-resolution electrophoresis, silver stained, and MHC bands quantified. Type I MHC is a smaller fraction of total MHC in the obese than in the lean. (b) Using western blots, type I MHC protein is less abundant, but (c) type II MHC protein and (d) embryonic MHC protein are not different between lean and obese. *P < 0.05 versus lean.
Figure 2(a) Myotubes were subjected to starvation (removal of serum and amino acids) or IGF-1 at time 0. Protein degradation rate was calculated over the first 5 hours (starved) or from 20–30 hours (IGF-1). Each data point is the mean of four replicates. (b) Myotubes were treated for 24 h and protein content determined. (c) Protein degradation rates in the presence of inhibitors of the proteasome (PS-341) or of lysosomal acidification (Conc. A). (d) Inhibitor-sensitive proteolysis was determined by subtracting the degradation rate in the presence of inhibitors from vehicle-treated controls. (e) Differences in protein degradation rates were determined by subtracting inhibitor sensitive values of lean from obese (Δ Degradation rate = degradation rateobese – degradation ratelean). *Significant main effect of treatment (P < 0.05). †Significant main effect between groups (P < 0.05). §Significant interaction effect (P < 0.05).
Figure 3(a) Chymotrypsin-like activity of the proteasome was assessed by the fluorogenic substrate Suc-LLVY-amc. (b–e) Western blot and protein abundance of proteasomal subunit proteins. (f) Representative blots of proteasomal subunits and membrane stained for total protein to demonstrate equal loading. ‡Significant main effect (basal versus starved, p<0.05). †Significant main effect (lean versus obese, P < 0.05).
Figure 4Real-time PCR for (a) genes involved in the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS), (b) the autophagic/lysosomal pathway, and (c) Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) signaling. (d) FoxO3 gene expression of obese myotubes expressed as fold relative to lean. (e) FoxO protein levels. (f) Representative blots of FoxO3 and membrane stained for total protein to demonstrate equal loading. *Significant effect versus basal (P < 0.05). †Significant main effect (obese versus lean, P < 0.05).
Figure 5Myotubes were kept in differentiation media (Basal) or starved of amino acids (Starved) for 24 h. (a) Representative gray-scale fluorescent images for myosin heavy chain and nuclei (Overlay), and individual components converted to threshold images representing Myosin Heavy Chain and Nuclei. (b) Myotube area. (c) Number of nuclei. (d) Myotube area per nucleus. Individual data points are presented. ‡Significant effect vs basal (P < 0.05).