OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to provide the opportunity to enable older people to prioritise the research agenda to improve their own oral health. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ageing population's views about their oral health from their perspective. Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) incorporate users' perspectives to prioritise research agendas and are based on a series of sequential steps to build consensus. This structured approach ensures their narrative and thoughts are heard and helps counter the 'top-down' medical model that can dominate healthcare services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PSP was undertaken with four key stakeholder groups: service users, carers, third sector and specialists. Six initial questions were posed to each group prior to a facilitated discussion led by one of the research team. Collective responses where then considered by a final consensus group. The views of the different groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: The top three research priorities identified by the final group were to: (i) identify 'best practice' in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases for older people, (ii) identify the training needs for the dental profession and (iii) understand the key issues for older people from their perspective. Improving access to services, the importance of client appropriate information and the need for effective primary and secondary prevention were also articulated. CONCLUSION: Asking older people to prioritise the research agenda proved to be a positive experience. Key issues related to improving communication and the availability of appropriate evidence-based information on primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to provide the opportunity to enable older people to prioritise the research agenda to improve their own oral health. BACKGROUND: Little is known about the ageing population's views about their oral health from their perspective. Priority Setting Partnerships (PSPs) incorporate users' perspectives to prioritise research agendas and are based on a series of sequential steps to build consensus. This structured approach ensures their narrative and thoughts are heard and helps counter the 'top-down' medical model that can dominate healthcare services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A PSP was undertaken with four key stakeholder groups: service users, carers, third sector and specialists. Six initial questions were posed to each group prior to a facilitated discussion led by one of the research team. Collective responses where then considered by a final consensus group. The views of the different groups were recorded, transcribed verbatim and underwent thematic analysis. RESULTS: The top three research priorities identified by the final group were to: (i) identify 'best practice' in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases for older people, (ii) identify the training needs for the dental profession and (iii) understand the key issues for older people from their perspective. Improving access to services, the importance of client appropriate information and the need for effective primary and secondary prevention were also articulated. CONCLUSION: Asking older people to prioritise the research agenda proved to be a positive experience. Key issues related to improving communication and the availability of appropriate evidence-based information on primary, secondary and tertiary prevention.
Authors: Paul R Brocklehurst; Gerald McKenna; Martin Schimmel; Anastassia Kossioni; Katarina Jerković-Ćosić; Martina Hayes; Cristiane da Mata; Frauke Müller Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2018-04-06 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Georgios Tsakos; Paul R Brocklehurst; Sinead Watson; Anna Verey; Nia Goulden; Alison Jenkins; Zoe Hoare; Kirstie Pye; Rebecca R Wassall; Andrea Sherriff; Anja Heilmann; Ciaran O'Neill; Craig J Smith; Joe Langley; Renato Venturelli; Peter Cairns; Nat Lievesley; Richard G Watt; Frank Kee; Gerald McKenna Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2021-07-02
Authors: Monica Parry; Ann Kristin Bjørnnes; Karine Toupin-April; Adhiyat Najam; David Wells; Aditi Sivakumar; Dawn P Richards; Tina Ceroni; Marianne Park; Anne K Ellis; Ian Gilron; Susan Marlin Journal: Patient Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 3.883