Literature DB >> 26009759

Efficacy of various protein-based coating on enhancing the shelf life of fresh eggs during storage.

Cengiz Caner1, Muhammed Yüceer2.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of various coatings (whey protein isolate [WPI], whey protein concentrate [WPC], zein, and shellac) on functional properties, interior quality, and eggshell breaking strength of fresh eggs were evaluated during storage at 24 °: C for 6 weeks. Coatings and storage time had significant effects on Haugh unit, yolk index, albumen pH, dry matter (DMA), relative whipping capacity (RWC), and albumen viscosity. Uncoated eggs had higher albumen pH (9.56) and weight loss, and lower albumen viscosity (5.73), Haugh unit (HU), and yolk index (YI) during storage. Among the coated eggs, the shellac and zein coated eggs had the highest value of albumen viscosity (27.26 to 26.90), HU (74.10 to 73.61), and YI (44.84 to 44.63) after storage. Shellac (1.44%) was more effective in preventing weight loss than WPC (4.59%), WPI (4.60%), and zein (2.13%) coatings. Uncoated eggs had the higest value (6.71%) of weight lost. All coatings increased shell strength (5.18 to 5.73 for top and 3.58 to 4.71 for bottom) significantly (P < 0.05) compared to the uncoated eggs (4.70 for top and 3.15 for bottom). The functional properties such as albumen DMA (14.50 to 16.66 and 18.97 for uncoated) and albumen RWC (841 to 891 and 475 for uncoated) of fresh eggs can be preserved during storage when they are coated. The shellac and zein coatings were more effective for maintaining the internal quality of fresh eggs during storage. Fourier transform near infrared (FT-NIR) in the 800 to 2500 nm reflection spectra were used to quantify the contents of the fresh eggs at the end of storage. Eggs coated with shellac or zein displayed a higher absorbance at 970 and 1,197 nm respectively (OH vibration of water) compared with those coated with WPI or WPC and the uncoated group at the end of storage. The coatings improved functional properties and also shell strength and could be a viable alternative technology for maintaining the internal quality of eggs during long-term storage. This study highlights the promising use of various coatings to both enhance the functional properties and to reduce the breakage of eggs.
© 2015 Poultry Science Association Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  egg quality; functional properties; protein coatings; shelf life; shell eggs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26009759     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pev102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

1.  Plasticizer types affect quality and shelf life of eggs coated with rice protein.

Authors:  Paula Gabriela da Silva Pires; Caroline Bavaresco; Aline Fernanda Rodrigues Leuven; Bruna Cristina Kuhn Gomes; Aline Kummer de Souza; Brenda Santaiana Prato; Liris Kindlein; Ines Andretta
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.701

Review 2.  Potential Implications of Natural Antioxidants of Plant Origin on Oxidative Stability of Chicken Albumen during Storage: A Review.

Authors:  Uchechukwu Edna Obianwuna; Vivian U Oleforuh-Okoleh; Jing Wang; Hai-Jun Zhang; Guang-Hai Qi; Kai Qiu; Shu-Geng Wu
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-25

3.  Effects of packaging methods on the quality of heavy metals-free preserved duck eggs during storage.

Authors:  Yuting Wang; Chunhong Xiong; Wenxiang Luo; Jianke Li; Yonggang Tu; Yan Zhao
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Effects of rice protein coating enriched with essential oils on internal quality and shelf life of eggs during room temperature storage.

Authors:  P G S Pires; A F R Leuven; C H Franceschi; G S Machado; P D S Pires; P O Moraes; L Kindlein; I Andretta
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Conservation of the internal quality of eggs using a biodegradable coating.

Authors:  Gabriel da S Oliveira; Vinícius M Dos Santos; Jullyana C Rodrigues; Ângela P Santana
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.