Micah W Smith1, Prokopis Annis1, Brandon D Lawrence1, Michael D Daubs1, Darrel S Brodke2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA. 2. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Utah, 590 Wakara Way Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA. Electronic address: Darrel.brodke@hsc.utah.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is a recognized complication of spinal deformity surgery. Acute PJF (APJF) has recently been demonstrated to be 5.6% in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. The incidence and rate of return to the operating room for APJF have not been specifically investigated in individuals with sagittal imbalance. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of APJF in patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance and the rate of return to the operating room for APJF. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: This study is based on a retrospective review of prospectively collected database of ASD patients. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred seventy-three consecutive patients were included with preoperative sagittal imbalance according to one of the following common parameters: sagittal vertical axis (SVA) greater than 50 mm, global sagittal alignment greater than 45°, or pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis greater than 10°. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measure was presence and/or absence of APJF defined as fracture at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, failure of UIV fixation, 15° or more proximal junctional kyphosis, or need for extension of instrumentation within 6 months of surgery. METHODS: We performed radiographic measurements on X-rays at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 6-month follow-up visits. The APJF rate was reported for the entire patient population with preoperative sagittal imbalance. Acute PJF incidence was calculated postoperatively for each of the accepted sagittal balance parameters and/or formulas. Patients with persistent postoperative sagittal imbalance were compared with the sagittally balanced group. We also assessed for threshold values. RESULTS: Acute PJF was observed in 60 of 173 patients (35%) and was least common in fusions with the UIV in the upper thoracic (UT) spine (p=.035). Of those who developed APJF, 21.7% required surgery. Proximal junctional kyphosis 15° or more was the most common form of APJF in fusions to the UT spine but least likely to need revision (p=.014). The most common mode of failure in lower thoracic (LT) or lumbar (L) fusions was UIV fracture. Postoperative SVA less than 50 mm was a significant risk factor for APJF (p=.009). CONCLUSIONS: Acute PJF is more common in patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance (35%) than the general adult deformity patient population, and 37% of those with APJF require revision. It is least common when the UIV is in the UT spine, compared with the LT or L spine. Sagittal balance correction to an SVA 50 mm or less was a significant risk factor in patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance.
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Proximal junctional failure (PJF) is a recognized complication of spinal deformity surgery. Acute PJF (APJF) has recently been demonstrated to be 5.6% in the adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. The incidence and rate of return to the operating room for APJF have not been specifically investigated in individuals with sagittal imbalance. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of APJF in patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance and the rate of return to the operating room for APJF. STUDY DESIGN/ SETTING: This study is based on a retrospective review of prospectively collected database of ASDpatients. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred seventy-three consecutive patients were included with preoperative sagittal imbalance according to one of the following common parameters: sagittal vertical axis (SVA) greater than 50 mm, global sagittal alignment greater than 45°, or pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis greater than 10°. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measure was presence and/or absence of APJF defined as fracture at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) or UIV+1, failure of UIV fixation, 15° or more proximal junctional kyphosis, or need for extension of instrumentation within 6 months of surgery. METHODS: We performed radiographic measurements on X-rays at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 6-month follow-up visits. The APJF rate was reported for the entire patient population with preoperative sagittal imbalance. Acute PJF incidence was calculated postoperatively for each of the accepted sagittal balance parameters and/or formulas. Patients with persistent postoperative sagittal imbalance were compared with the sagittally balanced group. We also assessed for threshold values. RESULTS: Acute PJF was observed in 60 of 173 patients (35%) and was least common in fusions with the UIV in the upper thoracic (UT) spine (p=.035). Of those who developed APJF, 21.7% required surgery. Proximal junctional kyphosis 15° or more was the most common form of APJF in fusions to the UT spine but least likely to need revision (p=.014). The most common mode of failure in lower thoracic (LT) or lumbar (L) fusions was UIV fracture. Postoperative SVA less than 50 mm was a significant risk factor for APJF (p=.009). CONCLUSIONS: Acute PJF is more common in patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance (35%) than the general adult deformitypatient population, and 37% of those with APJF require revision. It is least common when the UIV is in the UT spine, compared with the LT or L spine. Sagittal balance correction to an SVA 50 mm or less was a significant risk factor in patients with preoperative sagittal imbalance.
Authors: Michael M Safaee; Joseph A Osorio; Kushagra Verma; Shay Bess; Christopher I Shaffrey; Justin S Smith; Robert Hart; Vedat Deviren; Christopher P Ames Journal: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Maximilian Muellner; Henryk Haffer; Erika Chiapparelli; Yusuke Dodo; Ek T Tan; Jennifer Shue; Jiaqi Zhu; Andrew A Sama; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi; Alexander P Hughes Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-08-29 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Jun S Kim; Kevin Phan; Zoe B Cheung; Nam Lee; Luilly Vargas; Varun Arvind; Robert K Merrill; Sunder Gidumal; John Di Capua; Samuel Overley; James Dowdell; Samuel K Cho Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2018-06-25