Literature DB >> 26008178

Should pregnant women be included in phase IV clinical drug trials?

Gerald G Briggs1, Janine E Polifka2, Katherine L Wisner3, Eric Gervais4, Richard K Miller5, Anick Berard6, Gideon Koren7, Alicia Forinash8, Craig V Towers9.   

Abstract

Relatively few drugs, especially those recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, have published human pregnancy experience. Although all drugs contain animal reproduction data, these are usually not predictive of human risk. Clinical trials in pregnant women are rarely conducted because of ethical and legal concerns, and it may be many years before sufficient observational data are collected to guide clinical treatment decisions. Because many of these drugs will be used in pregnancy, human data are needed shortly after the drugs come to the market. Lack of human data leads to uncertainty over whether a drug can be safely prescribed for a pregnant patient. Unless there are compelling scientific and ethical reasons to exclude them, pregnant women should be included in phase IV clinical trials (postmarketing studies to obtain additional information, including the risks, benefits, and optimal use of a drug). This paper examines how physicians currently counsel pregnant women when there are no human data and proposes an alternative method in which knowledge regarding risks associated with the use of drugs during pregnancy can be enhanced in a clinical trial setting.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth defects; developmental toxicity; drugs; phase IV clinical trials; pregnancy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26008178     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Differentiating Research, Quality Improvement, and Case Studies to Ethically Incorporate Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Julia C Phillippi; Katherine E Hartmann
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 2.  Interpreting the pharmacoepidemiology literature in obstetrical studies: A guide for clinicians.

Authors:  Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Katelyn B Zumpf; Hannah K Betcher; Jody D Ciolino
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.300

3.  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and venlafaxine in pregnancy: Changes in drug disposition.

Authors:  Andreas Austgulen Westin; Malin Brekke; Espen Molden; Eirik Skogvoll; Olav Spigset
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Changes in drug disposition of lithium during pregnancy: a retrospective observational study of patient data from two routine therapeutic drug monitoring services in Norway.

Authors:  Andreas Austgulen Westin; Malin Brekke; Espen Molden; Eirik Skogvoll; Marianne Aadal; Olav Spigset
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Treatment With Antipsychotics in Pregnancy: Changes in Drug Disposition.

Authors:  Andreas A Westin; Malin Brekke; Espen Molden; Eirik Skogvoll; Ingrid Castberg; Olav Spigset
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Experiences and Perspectives of Marketing Authorisation Holders towards Medication Safety Monitoring during Pregnancy: A Pan-European Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  Laure Sillis; Veerle Foulon; Jan Y Verbakel; Michael Ceulemans
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Clinical comparison between trial participants and potentially eligible patients using electronic health record data: A generalizability assessment method.

Authors:  James R Rogers; George Hripcsak; Ying Kuen Cheung; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 8.000

8.  Towards an appropriate framework to facilitate responsible inclusion of pregnant women in drug development programs.

Authors:  Kit C B Roes; Indira S E van der Zande; Maarten van Smeden; Rieke van der Graaf
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  A Systematic Review of Treatment and Outcomes of Pregnant Women With COVID-19-A Call for Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Katelyn A Pastick; Melanie R Nicol; Elizabeth Smyth; Rebecca Zash; David R Boulware; Radha Rajasingham; Emily G McDonald
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.835

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.