| Literature DB >> 26007193 |
Chun-Sheng Zhu1, Bing Zhang2, Zhi-Jian Lin3, Xue-Jie Wang4, Yue Zhou5, Xiao-Xia Sun6, Ming-Liang Xiao7.
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the spectrum-effect relationships between high-performance liquid chromatography fingerprints and the uric acid-lowering activities of chicory. Chemical fingerprints of chicory samples from ten different sources were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and then investigated by similarity analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis. Pharmacodynamics experiments were conducted in animals to obtain the uric acid-lowering activity information of each chicory sample. The spectrum-effect relationships between chemical fingerprints and the uric acid-lowering activities of chicory were established by canonical correlation analysis. The structures of potential effective peaks were identified by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The results showed that a close correlation existed between the spectrum and effect of chicory. Aesculin, chlorogenic acid, chicoric acid, isochlorogenic acid A/B/C and 13,14-seco-stigma5(6),14(15)-diene-3α-ol might be the main effective constituents. This work provides a general model of the combination of high-performance liquid chromatography and uric acid-lowering activities to study the spectrum-effect relationships of chicory, which can be used to discover the principle components responsible for the bioactivity.Entities:
Keywords: chicory; spectrum-effect relationships; uric acid-lowering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26007193 PMCID: PMC6272355 DOI: 10.3390/molecules20059455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The HPLC fingerprints of the extracts of various chicory and reference standard fingerprint from the 10 chromatograms.
Figure 2The reference atlas from the 10 chromatograms of chicory.
The average retention time and relative peak area of every common characteristic peak.
| Peak NO | Retention Time | Average Relative Peak Area of Every Common Peak | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 a | S2 a | S3 a | S4 a | S5 a | S6 a | S7 a | S8 a | S9 a | S10 a | ||
| 1 | 7.8 | 0.05 | 1.20 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.39 | 0.37 |
| 2 | 10.9 | 0.26 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 1.23 | 0.16 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.75 | 2.30 |
| 3 | 14.3 | 0.33 | 0.27 | 0.30 | 0.66 | 0.27 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.52 | 0.32 |
| 4 | 17.7 | 0.25 | 3.15 | 1.31 | 1.16 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.62 | 0.50 |
| 5 | 21.1 | 0.18 | 0.88 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.27 | 1.09 |
| 6 | 27.1 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.27 | 0.32 |
| 7 | 28.1 | 0.27 | 0.34 | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.37 | 0.35 |
| 8 | 28.7 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| 9 | 30.3 | 0.50 | 1.72 | 0.52 | 0.41 | 0.58 | 0.10 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.21 | 0.81 |
| 10 | 30.8 | 0.17 | 0.59 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 0.33 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.40 | 0.22 | 0.24 |
| 11 | 42.0 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.07 |
| 12 | 42.5 | 0.36 | 2.67 | 1.33 | 0.86 | 0.54 | 0.27 | 0.48 | 0.34 | 0.83 | 0.34 |
| 13 | 59.6 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| 14 | 62.6 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.14 |
a: Average of three experiments.
Figure 3Hierarchical clustering analysis of chicory samples.
Figure 4Results of UA-lowering activities. The rates of UA-lowering for 13 groups were presented as mean ± SD (n = 10) and the data were statistically evaluated by one-way ANOVA. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant (compared with the control group * p < 0.05, compared with the model group # p < 0.05).
The correlation coefficient between UA-lowering and common characteristic peaks.
| Peak NO. | Correlation Coefficient | Peak NO. | Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.64 | 8 | 0.53 |
| 2 | 0.76 | 9 | 0.58 |
| 3 | 0.50 | 10 | 0.23 |
| 4 | 0.52 | 11 | 0.62 |
| 5 | 0.74 | 12 | 0.50 |
| 6 | 0.73 | 13 | −0.49 |
| 7 | 0.76 | 14 | −0.33 |
Identification of effective components in chicory by HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS3.
| Peak | tR (min) | M | [M−H]− ( | MS-MS ( | MS3 ( | Tentative Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.8 | 340 | 339.0 | 176.9 | 133.0 | Aesculin |
| 2 | 10.9 | 354 | 353.1 | 190.9 | 172.8, 154.9, 129.0 | Chlorogenic acid |
| 5 | 21.1 | 474 | 473.0 | 310.9 | 178.9, 148.9 | Chicoric acid |
| 6 | 27.1 | 516 | 515.2 | 353.0 | 190.9 | Isochlorogenic acid A/B/C |
| 7 | 28.1 | 516 | 515.2 | 353.0, 191.1 | 179.0, 135.1 | Isochlorogenic acid A/B/C |
| 11 | 42.0 | 414 | 412.6 | 259.0 | 199.9, 187.0, 171.0, 131.1 | 13,14- |
Raw herbs used in this work.
| Sample NO | Sources | Origins | Collection Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | Dalian, Liaoning | August 2013 | |
| S2 | Haidian, Beijing | Cichorium intybus L. | October 2014 |
| S3 | Dengta,Liaoning | October 2014 | |
| S4 | Zhaoqing, Heilongjiang | October 2014 | |
| S5 | Moyu, Xinjiang | October 2013 | |
| S6 | Neimenggu | October 2011 | |
| S7 | Pingshan, Hebei | August 2012 | |
| S8 | Shouguang, Shandong | October 2013 | |
| S9 | Changji, Xinjiang | August 2014 | |
| S10 | Changji, Xinjiang | October 2014 |