Literature DB >> 26006752

The Epidemiology of Mandibular Fractures in the United States, Part 1: A Review of 13,142 Cases from the US National Trauma Data Bank.

Paul N Afrooz1, Michael R Bykowski1, Isaac B James2, Lily N Daniali3, Julio A Clavijo-Alvarez4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To date, no studies have analyzed the national demographics of mandibular fractures in the United States. This report is part 1 of a 2-part series characterizing the modern demographics, epidemiology, and outcomes of mandibular fractures in the United States. The purpose of this study was to characterize mandibular fractures in relation to age, gender, mechanism of injury, and anatomic location of fracture.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB). The sample was derived from the population of hospitalized patients enrolled in the NTDB from 2001 to 2005 using mandibular fracture (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 802.21 through 802.39) as an inclusion criterion. Patient- and injury-related variables, including age, gender, anatomic location of fracture, and mechanism of injury, were analyzed by Fisher exact and χ(2) testing.
RESULTS: A total of 13,142 patients with mandibular fractures from participating trauma centers were included in the study. Eighty percent of patients were male. Fracture distribution by age was roughly bell-shaped, with fractures occurring most frequently at 18 to 54 years of age. Mechanism of injury differed by gender, with men most often sustaining mandibular fracture from assault (49.1%), followed by motor vehicle accidents (MVAs; 25.4%) and falls (12.8%). Women most commonly sustained mandibular fracture from MVAs (53.7%), followed by assault (14.5%) and falls (23.7%). Falls were a significantly more common mechanism in patients who were at least 65 years old (P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This study sought to characterize the largest, modern, population-based sample of mandibular fractures in the United States. Overall, men had a 4-fold higher incidence, but this distribution varied by age. Similarly, mechanism of injury varied across gender and age range. A better understanding of the influence of age and gender on mechanism of injury and anatomic site is of great clinical importance in the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of traumatic mandibular fractures.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26006752     DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


  25 in total

1.  A Clinical Comparison and Economic Evaluation of Erich Arch Bars, 4-Point Fixation, and Bone-Supported Arch Bars for Maxillomandibular Fixation.

Authors:  Meade C Edmunds; T Alex McKnight; Christopher M Runyan; Brian W Downs; Jordan L Wallin
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  A finite element analysis of the stress distribution to the mandible from impact forces with various orientations of third molars.

Authors:  Yun-Feng Liu; Russell Wang; Dale A Baur; Xian-Feng Jiang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2018 Jan.       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Comparison of single versus two non-compression miniplates in the management of unfavourable angle fracture of the mandible: a prospective randomized clinical study.

Authors:  Anshul Rai; Anuj Jain; Abhay Datarkar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-19

Review 4.  Mandible Fractures.

Authors:  Brent B Pickrell; Arman T Serebrakian; Renata S Maricevich
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  No apparent association between dental implants and mandibular fractures resulting from external forces.

Authors:  Shunsuke Hino; Tateyuki Iizuka; Nikola Saulacic; Niklaus P Lang; John-Patrik M Burkhard
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Multi-institutional Analysis of Surgical Management and Outcomes of Mandibular Fracture Repair in Adults.

Authors:  Dmitry Zavlin; Kevin T Jubbal; Anthony Echo; Shayan A Izaddoost; Jeffrey D Friedman; Olushola Olorunnipa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2017-06-08

7.  Double unilateral, bilateral, and multiple mandibular fractures: an observational study.

Authors:  Lucas Borin Moura; Guilherme Dos Santos Trento; Pedro Henrique de Azambuja Carvalho; Mariana Granucci; Júlio César Silva de Oliveira; Valfrido Antonio Pereira-Filho
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-08-14

8.  Patient Race and Insurance Status Do Not Impact the Treatment of Simple Mandibular Fractures.

Authors:  Thomas Q Xu; Aaron L Wiegmann; Taylor J Jarazcewski; Ethan M Ritz; Carlos A Q Santos; Amir H Dorafshar
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-04

9.  High Submandibular Anteroparotid Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Condylar Fracture.

Authors:  Kamichika Hayashi; Takeshi Onda; Hirona Honda; Mitsuru Takata; Hiroyuki Matsuda; Hidetoshi Tamura; Masayuki Takano
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2021-07-09

10.  Parathyroid hormone promotes cartilage healing after free reduction of mandibular condylar fractures by upregulating Sox9.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Jia; Liuqin Xie; Zhenglong Tang; Dongxiang Wang; Yun Hu; Guoxing Zhang; Youli Chen; Qiong Gao
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.