| Literature DB >> 26006231 |
Raghavendra Baregundi Subbarao1, Imran Ullah2, Eun-Jin Kim3, Si-Jung Jang4, Won-Jae Lee5, Ryoung Hoon Jeon6, Dawon Kang7, Sung-Lim Lee8, Bong-Wook Park9, Gyu-Jin Rho10,11.
Abstract
Endometrial stromal cells (EMSCs) obtained from porcine uterus (n = 6) were positive for mesenchymal stem cell markers (CD29, CD44 and CD90), and negative for epithelial marker CD9 and hematopoietic markers CD34, CD45 analyzed by flow cytometry. Further the cells were positive for expression of mesenchymal markers, CD105, CD140b, and CD144 by PCR. Pluripotent markers OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG were positively expressed in EMSCs analyzed by Western blotting and PCR. Further, differentiation into adipocytes and osteocytes was confirmed by cytochemical staining and lineage specific gene expression by quantitative realtime-PCR. Adipocyte (FABP, LPL, AP2) and osteocyte specific genes (ON, BG, RUNX2) in differentiated EMSCs showed significant (p < 0.05) increase in expression compared to undifferentiated control cells. Neurogenic transdifferentiation of EMSCs exhibited distinctive dendritic morphology with axon projections and neuronal specific genes, NFM, NGF, MBP, NES, B3T and MAP2 and proteins, B3T, NFM, NGF, and TRKA were positively expressed in neuronal differentiated cells. Functional analysis of neuronal differentiated EMSCs displayed voltage-dependence and kinetics for transient outward K+ currents (Ito), at holding potential of -80 mV, Na+ currents and during current clamp, neuronal differentiated EMSCs was more negative than that of control EMSCs. Porcine EMSCs is a suitable model for studying molecular mechanism of transdifferentiation, assessment of electrophysiological properties and their efficiency during in vivo transplantation.Entities:
Keywords: endometrium; mesenchymal stem cells; multilineage differentiation; porcine; transdifferentiation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26006231 PMCID: PMC4463684 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160510934
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Characterization of porcine endometrial stromal cells (A) Single cell colony (Scale bar = 50 μm); (B) At 14 days of culture, colony displaying fibroblast like morphology (Scale bar = 100 μm). Pluripotent gene expression analysis in EMSCs and porcine fibroblast cells; (C) PCR product after gel electrophoresis, HMBS as internal control gene; (D) Western blot showing positive expression of OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG. GADPH was used as an internal control; (E) CD markers analysis by flow cytometry; Color filled histogram represents specific surface maker and open histograms refers to isotype controls. EMSCs were strongly positive (>94%) for CD29, CD44, CD90, and negative (<2%) for CD34, CD45, and epithelial surface marker CD9; (F) PCR analysis of cell surface markers CD105, CD140b and CD144 from passage 3 EMSCs and fibroblast as negative control by PCR. HBMS was used as an internal control; (G) Immunofluorescence analysis of passage 3 EMSCs showing positive expression of OCT4 and SOX2 pluripotent markers (Scale bar = 100 μm).
Figure 2Mesenchymal differentiation potential of EMSCs to adipocytes and osteocytes compared to BMSCs. (A) Oil red O staining of lipid droplets; (B) RT-qPCR expression of adipocyte specific genes; (C) Von Kossa, Alizarin Red staining of mineralization of calcium deposit from differentiated cells; and (D) Osteogenic specific gene expression by RT-qPCR. HMBS was used for normalization. Scale bar = 50 μm. (* indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) in expression of mRNA between differentiated and untreated control EMSCs).
Figure 3In vitro differentiation of porcine EMSCs into neuron-like cells. (A) Morphological changes after two days of induction compared to untreated control cells; (B) RT-qPCR analysis of neurogenic specific transcripts NGF, NES, MBP, MAP2, B3T, NFM showed significantly higher expression in induced cells compared to non-induced EMSCs control cells; and (C) Immunofluorescence analysis showed positive expression of B3T, NFM, NGF, and TRKA in neuronal induced cells which were absent in non-induced control cells. DAPI indicates the nucleus and MERGE indicates the positive expression of protein, FITC conjugated IgG secondary antibody. Scale bar = 100 μm. (* indicates significant differences (p < 0.05) in expression of mRNA between neuronal differentiated cells and untreated control EMSCs.). HMBS was used for normalization.
Figure 4Electrophysiological analysis of porcine EMSCs and neuronal DEMSCs. (A) Comparison of K+ currents between undifferentiated EMSC (NDEMSC) and differentiated into neurogenic cells (DEMSC). Membrane currents were recorded with the 600-ms voltage steps as shown in the inset in the absence and presence of 3 mM TEA (n = 30); (B) Representative traces of Na+ currents obtained in NDEMSC and DEMSC. Voltage-dependent Na+ currents were recorded in DEMSC in response to 100-ms voltage steps (n = 30); (C) Comparison of resting membrane potential between NDEMSC and DEMSC. Each bar represents the mean ± SD. The (*) indicates a significant difference from the NDEMSC (p < 0.05).
RT-PCR and RT-qPCR primers sequences specific to porcine MSCs and differentiated cells.
| Gene | Primer Sequence (5'–3') | Products Sizes (bp) | Annealing Tm (°C) | Reference/Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-AGGTGTTCAGCCAAACGACC | 335 | 60 | Carlin | |
| R-TGATCGTTTGCCCTTCTGGC | ||||
| F-GCCTGGGCGCCGAGTGGA | 443 | 64 | Carlin | |
| R-GGGCGAGCCGTTCATGTAGGTCTG | ||||
| F-ATCCAGCTTGTCCCCAAAG | 438 | 60 | Carlin | |
| R-ATTTCATTCGCTGGTTCTGG | ||||
| F-CGCTTCAGCTTCCTCCTCCG | 281 | 56 | Miernik & Karasinski, 2012 | |
| R-CACCACGGGCTCCCGCTTG | ||||
| F-TACGTGCCCATGCTGGACATG | 175 | 54 | Miernik & Karasinski, 2012 | |
| R-TGGTAGCTGAAGCCCACGAG | ||||
| F-TGCAACGAGCGGGGCGAGTT | 220 | 56 | Miernik & Karasinski, 2012 | |
| R-CGCCGCCCTCCTCATCGTA | ||||
| F-TGGTACAGGTGCAGAAGTGGGA | 100 | 60 | NM_001002817 | |
| R-GCCGTGACACCTTTCATGATACA | ||||
| F-CAAACTTGTGGCTGCCCTAT | 202 | 60 | Kumar | |
| R-AAGGCTGTATCCCAGGAGGT | ||||
| F-AACCCAACCTGATCACTG | 192 | 60 | AF102872.1 | |
| R-TCTTTCCATCCCACTTCTGC | ||||
| F-TCCGGATCTTTCCTTTGGTTTCTA | 187 | 60 | Kumar | |
| R-CCTTCACATCGTGGCAAGAGTTTG | ||||
| F-CAGACCAGCAGCACTCCATA | 167 | 60 | XM_003482203 | |
| R-AACGCCATCATTCTGGTTAG | ||||
| F-GTCGTCCAGTGCTCTGACCT | 93 | 60 | XM_003135475 | |
| R-GGAGCTCGGAGATGTCGTTA | ||||
| F-CAGAGCAAGAACAGCAGCAGCTACTT | 227 | 60 | XM_003480812 | |
| R-GTGAACTCCATCTCATCCATGCCCTC | ||||
| F-GTCAGACCAGGCAGAAGAGG | 222 | 60 | Kumar | |
| R-GATTTGGGCATAGGGGATTT | ||||
| F-AGGAACCAAAAGAGGCAGGT | 229 | 60 | Kumar | |
| R-TTGGGACCAGGGACTGTTAG | ||||
| F-CACACCGAGAGCAATGTCCC | 130 | 60 | XM_005674272 | |
| R-CCACCCTGGCGGCTATCGCC | ||||
| F-GAGATGGCTCAACTCAGAACG | 125 | 60 | NM_001001546 | |
| R-GGTTAGTATTTGCCGTGAGCA | ||||
| F-GCCATTATTCGTACACCTCCA | 291 | 60 | XM_005672149 | |
| R-AGAGCCGCATTTGGATGTCAC | ||||
| F-TTCATTCCCTCAAGGACCTG | 101 | 60 | NM_001097412 | |
| R-GGGGTGAAAGACAACAGCAT |