Literature DB >> 26006141

Treatment of left main shock syndrome with percutaneous coronary intervention in the absence of an advanced left ventricular assist device or ECMO.

Mutlu Vural1, İrfan Şahin, İlker Avcı, Fatih Kızkapan, Sezai Yıldız.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26006141      PMCID: PMC5779146          DOI: 10.5152/akd.2015.6195

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol        ISSN: 2149-2263            Impact factor:   1.596


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Acute total occlusion of the unprotected left main coronary artery (LM) results in cardiogenic shock, or left main shock syndrome (LMSS), in the majority of affected patients (1). The prognosis of the subset of patients with LMSS and complete occlusion is dire, with up to 100% mortality (2). In this paper, three patients with LMSS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) alone or PCI with the implementation of IABP were included. We have discussed how to approach a patient with LMSS on diagnosis and transfer and its treatment in the absence of advanced LV assist devices or ECMO.

Case Reports

Case 1

A patient with a direct crossover LM-to-LAD stent had a sudden onset of chest pain at our outpatient clinic. His ECG showed ST-segment elevation of D1 and aVL (Fig. 1). We observed an acute complete occlusion of LM, which resulted from subacute thrombosis of the crossover LM-to-LAD stent. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) occurred during the introduction of a 2.0×20-mm catheter balloon (Invader, Alvi Medica Co). Because the balloon catheter was already at the tip of the JL4 guiding catheter, we first inflated the balloon at 8 atm. Then, we attempted to convert VF and observed that it already spontaneously recovered to sinus rhythm after balloon dilatation. Later, a 3.5×15-mm bare metal stent (BMS, Integrity, Medtronic Co.) was inserted to the proximal portion of the previous stent with a final kissing balloon (2.0×20 mm and 3.5×20 mm; Invader, Alvi Medica Co) in LAD and the left circumflex artery (LCx). During the procedure, three VFs and one pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) were converted to sinus rhythm via a defibril-lator. The first VF (before predilatation) and one VT (after PCI) were spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm. There was no problem for four months after follow-up.
Figure 1

ECG of the first case with LMSS showed an ST-segment elevation in D1 and aVL, indicating only a high lateral myocardial infarction. LMSS-left main shock syndrome

ECG of the first case with LMSS showed an ST-segment elevation in D1 and aVL, indicating only a high lateral myocardial infarction. LMSS-left main shock syndrome

Case 2

A 19-year-old man was admitted to the emergency department with complaints of nausea, vomiting, and confusion for an hour. ECG showed an anterolateral infarction (Fig. 2). The history of smoking and Bonsai (synthetic cannabinoids) abuse was noted. LM was totally occluded. The symptom-onset-to-balloon time was more than 1 h. After predilatation with a 3.0×20-mm balloon (Invader, Alvi Medica Co), the implantation of a crossover LM-to-LAD stent with a 4.0×20-mm BMS (CC Flex, Euatech AG) resulted in TIMI 3 perfusion of LAD (Fig. 3). VF occurred and was successfully defibrillated. After the introduction of IABP, he was transferred to the coronary care unit. He died despite all efforts.
Figure 2

ECG of the second case with LMSS indicated an anterolateral infarction due to a spasm and thrombus in LM, probably associated with Bonsai abuse

LM - left main; LMSS - left main shock syndrome

Figure 3

a, b. A total occlusion of LM due to a spasm and thrombosis (a) resulting in LMSS was treated with PCI and implementation of IABP after the procedure (b)

IABP - intraaortic balloon pump; LM - left main; LMSS - left main shock syndrome; PCI - percutaneous coronary intervention

ECG of the second case with LMSS indicated an anterolateral infarction due to a spasm and thrombus in LM, probably associated with Bonsai abuse LM - left main; LMSS - left main shock syndrome a, b. A total occlusion of LM due to a spasm and thrombosis (a) resulting in LMSS was treated with PCI and implementation of IABP after the procedure (b) IABP - intraaortic balloon pump; LM - left main; LMSS - left main shock syndrome; PCI - percutaneous coronary intervention

Case 3

A 74-year-old man was admitted to a medical center with syncope that developed an hour before admission. His ECG (Fig. 4) indicated an anterolateral myocardial infarction. There was a thrombus in the ostium of LM. The symptom-onset-to-balloon time was 3 h. A 4.0×12-mm BMS (Liberte, Boston Scientific) was directly implanted (Fig. 5). The deployment of a stent to LCx was unsuccessful. Four VFs were successfully defibrillated during this procedure. He died despite the implementation of IABP and intensive medical care.
Figure 4

ECG of the third case with LMSS indicated an anterolateral infarction

LMSS - left main shock syndrome

Figure 5

a, b. On coronary angiography, both a massive thrombus occluding to LM and a 90% stenosis of LCx were shown in the third case with LMSS (a). IABP was introduced after PCI (b)

LCx - left circumflex artery; LM - left main; LMSS - left main shock syndrome; PCI - percutaneous coronary intervention

ECG of the third case with LMSS indicated an anterolateral infarction LMSS - left main shock syndrome a, b. On coronary angiography, both a massive thrombus occluding to LM and a 90% stenosis of LCx were shown in the third case with LMSS (a). IABP was introduced after PCI (b) LCx - left circumflex artery; LM - left main; LMSS - left main shock syndrome; PCI - percutaneous coronary intervention

Discussion

LMSS has an extremely poor prognosis with common occurrences of poor final flow, pump failure, and multiorgan failure. The dominance of RCA, which is the only open artery in LMSS, extent of LM perfusion (TIMI 0-3), and symptom-onset-to-balloon time probably determine the longevity of time period to develop and sustain LMSS. This invaluable time is usually wasted in LMSS during diagnosis and transfer. ECG showed a high lateral infarction in the first case and anterolateral infarction in the other two cases. The diagnosis of LM involvement can only be made on angiography. A prompt application of stenting results in acceptable mortality and morbidity rates (1-5). Hata et al. (6) suggest that an immediate PCI with mechanical supports is required prior to coronary artery bypass surgery for the survival of patients with LMSS. Unfortunately, percutaneous assist devices or ECMO are not widely available (7-9). The first patient survived after PCI alone, probably because of the less than 15-min symptom-onset-to-balloon time, which was 75 and 180 min in the other two cases respectively (10). A late successful reperfusion of LM was not sufficient to recover the bad outcome despite introduction of an IABP.

Conclusion

Because ECG is not a reliable tool, an anterolateral infarction should be treated as LMSS unless it is disregarded on coronary angiography. Despite a proper PCI and implementation of IABP, LMSS cannot easily recover and may deteriorate faster. We believe that a part time introduction of advanced LV assist devices or ECMO to support a failing heart contributes to poor prognosis in LMSS. The rapid restoration of flow with a symptom-onset-to-balloon time less than 15 min may be a definitive intervention with optional implementation of IABP for an inpatient.

Video 1

A definitive PCI was performed with final kissing at the end of the procedure to treat subacute thrombosis of a crossover LM-to-LAD stent. LAD - left anterior descending artery; LM - left main; LMSS - left main shock syndrome
  10 in total

1.  Bifurcation balloon for left main shock syndrome: facilitating the simultaneous percutaneous reperfusion of the LAD and circumflex.

Authors:  Karen de Man; Mark Patterson; Ferdinand Kiemeneij
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  ECMO therapy after thrombotic left main occlusion bridges prolonged cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Ulrich Grabmaier; Hans D Theiss; Christian Hagl; Wolfgang-Michael Franz
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Effect of primary angioplasty on total or subtotal left main occlusion: analysis of incidence, clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic determinants.

Authors:  H K Yip; C J Wu; M C Chen; H W Chang; K Y Hsieh; C L Hang; M Fu
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Outcome of emergency conventional coronary surgery for acute coronary syndrome due to left main coronary disease.

Authors:  Mitsumasa Hata; Motomi Shiono; Akira Sezai; Mitsuru Iida; Isamu Yoshitake; Shinji Wakui; Makoto Taoka; Nanao Negishi; Yukiyasu Sezai
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.520

5.  Primary angioplasty of unprotected left main coronary artery for acute anterolateral myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Koyu Sakai; Yoshihisa Nakagawa; Takeshi Kimura; Kenji Ando; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Masashi Iwabuchi; Katsumi Inoue; Hideyuki Nosaka; Masakiyo Nobuyoshi
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.022

6.  Primary stenting for left-main shock syndrome.

Authors:  Masahisa Yamane; Soushin Inoue; Akiko Yamane; Osamu Kinebuchi; Hitoshi Yokozuka
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.534

7.  Current spectrum of cardiogenic shock and effect of early revascularization on mortality. Results of an International Registry. SHOCK Registry Investigators.

Authors:  J S Hochman; J Boland; L A Sleeper; M Porway; J Brinker; J Col; A Jacobs; J Slater; D Miller; H Wasserman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Richard W Smalling; Gerhard C Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Long-term outcomes of simple crossover stenting from the left main to the left anterior descending coronary artery.

Authors:  Ho-Myung Lee; Chang-Wook Nam; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Hyoung-Seob Park; Hyungseop Kim; In-Sung Chung; Yun-Seok Heo; Seung-Ho Hur; Yoon-Nyun Kim; Kwon-Bae Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  A successful team treatment for left main shock syndrome.

Authors:  Bin Que; Yu-Tong Cheng; Hai Gao; Xiao-Tong Hou; Ran Dong; Nan Li; Shao-Ping Nie
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.327

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.