Literature DB >> 26006138

Coronary slow flow: Electrophysiologic evidence of ischemia?

M Reza Movahed1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26006138      PMCID: PMC5779138          DOI: 10.5152/akd.2015.15587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol        ISSN: 2149-2263            Impact factor:   1.596


× No keyword cloud information.
Zehir et al. (1) found that Tpe (T-wave peak to end time) Interval and Tpe/QT ratio were prolonged in patients with Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenen (CSFP), published in this issue of Anatol J Cardiol. The coronary slow flow phenomenon is an angiographic finding that is characterized by slow progression of the contrast seen during coronary angiography. It can be present in a diverse population from chest discomfort to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. The pathogenesis of this phenomenon remains unknown, and it is not clear if it is a primary or secondary phenomena. This phenomenon has been seen in various clinical settings including non-cardiac chest pain, infection and critically ill patients. The incidence of this syndrome thought to be approximately 1% among patients who undergo coronary angiography, particularly in those presenting with acute coronary syndrome (2). It is probably more prevalent than as described, since many patients could be asymptomatic or have not undergone coronary angiography. It usually occurs in all coronary territories, and therefore, resolved coronary thrombus as the underlying mechanism cannot explain this phenomenon. Transient endothelial dysfunction is probably the main underlying mechanism for its occurrence. In this paper (1), the authors studied the effect of slow flow on the peak to the end of electrocardio-graphic T wave (Tpe) and its ratio to QT, which was prolonged in these patients. These observations have been seen in patients with acute coronary syndrome (3) and are related to ischemia driven imbalance in repolarization. The fact that these abnormalities can be observed in patients with slow flow coronaries suggests that slow flow is not a benign condition because it causes inhomogeneity in repolarization as the potential trigger for arrhythmias. Small vessel disease, endothelial dysfunction, subclinical atherosclerosis, and inflammation are believed to play a role in this phenomenon (4-6). There are not many studies that have evaluated the changes in ECG parameters in patients with coronary slow flow phenomena. Atak et al. (7) found QT prolongation in patients with slow flow consistent with the negative effect of this phenomenon on myocardial cells. In this paper, TPe was prolonged. TPe/QT ratio is an index of arrhythmogenesis (8). Therefore, the observation of this study suggests that slow flow phenomena can potentially lead to arrhythmias. Treatment of these patients remains controversial. Intracoronary vasodilator and adenosine will usually normalize flow. However, the beneficial effect of giving intracoronary adenosine on the clinical outcome of these patients has not been studied. Because of the rarity of this syndrome and its occurrence in diverse clinical setting, making a definite conclusion about the pathophysiology of this phenomenon is difficult. This is an important study showing that slow flow needs to be considered as an ischemia inducing phenomena. However, we need to be cautious in interpreting this study. The authors involved small number of patients, which is a major limitation of their study. However, p values were all statistically significant, suggesting that their results are valid. Further research is needed to understand the pathogenesis of slow flow and the pathogenies of this phenomenon.
  8 in total

1.  Diffuse intimal thickening of coronary arteries in slow coronary flow.

Authors:  V Gökhan Cin; Hasan Pekdemir; Ahmet Camsar; Dilek Ciçek; M Necdet Akkus; Tuncay Parmaksýz; Tuna Katýrcýbaý; Oben Döven
Journal:  Jpn Heart J       Date:  2003-11

2.  Slow coronary flow: a distinct angiographic subgroup in syndrome X.

Authors:  P K Goel; S K Gupta; A Agarwal; A Kapoor
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Effects of slow coronary artery flow on QT interval duration and dispersion.

Authors:  Ramazan Atak; Hasan Turhan; Alpay T Sezgin; Ozkan Yetkin; Kubilay Senen; Mehmet Ileri; Onur Sahin; Orhan Karabal; Ertan Yetkin; Emine Kutuk; Deniz Demirkan
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Endothelin-1 and nitric oxide concentrations and their response to exercise in patients with slow coronary flow.

Authors:  Ahmet Camsarl; Hasan Pekdemir; Dilek Cicek; Gürbüz Polat; M Necdet Akkus; Oben Döven; V Gökhan Cin; Tuna Katlrclbasl; Tuncay Parmakslz
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 5.  T(p-e)/QT ratio as an index of arrhythmogenesis.

Authors:  Prasad Gupta; Chinmay Patel; Harsh Patel; Srinivasa Narayanaswamy; Binu Malhotra; Jared T Green; Gan-Xin Yan
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-09-14       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Increased plasma C-reactive protein and interleukin-6 concentrations in patients with slow coronary flow.

Authors:  Jian-Jun Li; Xue-Wen Qin; Zi-Cheng Li; He-Song Zeng; Zhan Gao; Bo Xu; Chao-Yang Zhang; Jie Li
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 3.786

7.  Evaluation of QT, QT dispersion, and T-wave peak to end time changes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Vahid Eslami; Morteza Safi; Maryam Taherkhani; Ali Adibi; Mohammad Reza Movahed
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.022

8.  Evaluation of Tpe interval and Tpe/QT ratio in patients with slow coronary flow.

Authors:  Regayip Zehir; Can Yücel Karabay; Arzu Kalaycı; Taylan Akgün; Alev Kılıçgedik; Cevat Kırma
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 1.596

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.