Literature DB >> 26006067

Phase II neoadjuvant clinical trial of carboplatin and eribulin in women with triple negative early-stage breast cancer (NCT01372579).

Virginia G Kaklamani1, Jacqueline S Jeruss, Elisha Hughes, Kalliopi Siziopikou, Kirsten M Timms, Alexander Gutin, Victor Abkevich, Zaina Sangale, Cara Solimeno, Krystal L Brown, Joshua Jones, Anne-Renee Hartman, Caitlin Meservey, Borko Jovanovic, Irene Helenowski, Seema A Khan, Kevin Bethke, Nora Hansen, Regina Uthe, Sara Giordano, Steven Rosen, Kent Hoskins, Jamie Von Roenn, Sarika Jain, Vamsi Parini, William Gradishar.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant treatment with carboplatin and eribulin in patients with early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), and to explore biomarkers based on DNA and protein expression profiles as predictors of response. Patients with histologically confirmed early-stage TNBC received carboplatin AUC 6 iv every 21 days, and eribulin 1.4 mg/m(2) day 1 and day 8 every 21 days for four cycles. The primary endpoint of the study was pathologic complete response (pCR), with secondary endpoints including clinical response and safety of the combination. Exploratory studies assessed DNA-based biomarkers [homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, and HR deficiency status (HRD score + BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status)], protein-based biomarkers (Ki67, TP53, androgen receptor, Cyclin E, CDK2, Cyclin D, CDK4, Pin1 and Smad3), and clinical pretreatment factors as predictors of pCR. 13/30 (43.3 %) patients enrolled in the study achieved pCR. 24 (80.0 %) had a clinical complete or partial response. The combination was safe with mostly grade 1 and 2 toxicities. HRD score (P = 0.0024) and HR deficiency status (P = 0.0012) significantly predicted pCR. Pretreatment cytoplasmic CDK2 was also associated with pCR (P = 0.021). Significant differences in pre- versus post-treatment expression levels of nuclear Cyclin D (P = 0.020), nuclear CDK4 (P = 0.0030), and nuclear Smad3 (P = 0.015) were detected. The combination of carboplatin and eribulin is safe and efficacious in the treatment of early-stage TNBC. HRD score, HR deficiency status, and cytoplasmic CDK2 predicted pCR in this patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26006067     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3435-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  22 in total

Review 1.  Predictive biomarkers for triple negative breast cancer treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Juan Jin; Wenwen Zhang; Wenfei Ji; Fang Yang; Xiaoxiang Guan
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 2.  PARP inhibitors as single agents and in combination therapy: the most promising treatment strategies in clinical trials for BRCA-mutant ovarian and triple-negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Linjie Luo; Khandan Keyomarsi
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 6.498

3.  Correlation of Platinum Cytotoxicity to Drug-DNA Adduct Levels in a Breast Cancer Cell Line Panel.

Authors:  Sisi Wang; Tiffany M Scharadin; Maike Zimmermann; Michael A Malfatti; Kenneth W Turteltaub; Ralph de Vere White; Chong-Xian Pan; Paul T Henderson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Eribulin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer patients stratified by homologous recombination deficiency status: a multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Norikazu Masuda; Hiroko Bando; Takashi Yamanaka; Takayuki Kadoya; Masato Takahashi; Shigenori E Nagai; Shoichiro Ohtani; Tomoyuki Aruga; Eiji Suzuki; Yuichiro Kikawa; Hiroyuki Yasojima; Hiroi Kasai; Hiroshi Ishiguro; Hidetaka Kawabata; Satoshi Morita; Hironori Haga; Tatsuki R Kataoka; Ryuji Uozumi; Shinji Ohno; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Cytotoxic and targeted therapy for hereditary cancers.

Authors:  Aglaya G Iyevleva; Evgeny N Imyanitov
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

Review 6.  Eribulin in the Management of Advanced Breast Cancer: Implications of Current Research Findings.

Authors:  Victor C Kok
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 7.  Neoadjuvant treatments in triple-negative breast cancer patients: where we are now and where we are going.

Authors:  Claudia Omarini; Giorgia Guaitoli; Stefania Pipitone; Luca Moscetti; Laura Cortesi; Stefano Cascinu; Federico Piacentini
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 8.  Efficacy of eribulin in breast cancer: a short report on the emerging new data.

Authors:  Gelareh Eslamian; Caroline Wilson; Robin J Young
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Synergistic effect of eribulin and CDK inhibition for the treatment of triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Shreyas S Rao; Jenna Stoehr; Danijela Dokic; Lei Wan; Joseph T Decker; Kristine Konopka; Alexandra L Thomas; Jia Wu; Virginia G Kaklamani; Lonnie D Shea; Jacqueline S Jeruss
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-10

Review 10.  How shall we treat early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): from the current standard to upcoming immuno-molecular strategies.

Authors:  Ji Hyun Park; Jin-Hee Ahn; Sung-Bae Kim
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-05-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.