Literature DB >> 26005223

Regression Analysis for Differentially Misclassified Correlated Binary Outcomes.

Li Tang1, Robert H Lyles2, Caroline C King3, Joseph W Hogan4, Yungtai Lo5.   

Abstract

In many epidemiological and clinical studies, misclassification may arise in one or several variables, resulting in potentially invalid analytic results (e.g., estimates of odds ratios of interest) when no correction is made. Here we consider the situation in which correlated binary response variables are subject to misclassification. Building upon prior work, we provide an approach to adjust for potentially complex differential misclassification via internal validation sampling applied at multiple study time points. We seek to estimate the parameters of a primary generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) that accounts for baseline and/or time-dependent covariates. The misclassification process is modeled via a second generalized linear model that captures variations in sensitivity and specificity parameters according to time and a set of subject-specific covariates that may or may not overlap with those in the primary model. Simulation studies demonstrate the precision and validity of the proposed method. An application is presented based on longitudinal assessments of bacterial vaginosis conducted in the HIV Epidemiology Research (HER) Study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bias; Differential misclassification; Nonlinear mixed model; Validation

Year:  2015        PMID: 26005223      PMCID: PMC4440592          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  17 in total

1.  Modelling risk when binary outcomes are subject to error.

Authors:  Pat McInturff; Wesley O Johnson; David Cowling; Ian A Gardner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Validation study methods for estimating exposure proportions and odds ratios with misclassified data.

Authors:  R J Marshall
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Extending McNemar's test: estimation and inference when paired binary outcome data are misclassified.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; John M Williamson; Hung-Mo Lin; Charles M Heilig
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The effects of misclassification on the estimation of relative risk.

Authors:  B A Barron
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Validation data-based adjustments for outcome misclassification in logistic regression: an illustration.

Authors:  Robert H Lyles; Li Tang; Hillary M Superak; Caroline C King; David D Celentano; Yungtai Lo; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  Design and baseline participant characteristics of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Epidemiology Research (HER) Study: a prospective cohort study of human immunodeficiency virus infection in US women.

Authors:  D K Smith; D L Warren; D Vlahov; P Schuman; M D Stein; B L Greenberg; S D Holmberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Use of the positive predictive value to correct for disease misclassification in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  H Brenner; O Gefeller
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Use of predictive value to adjust relative risk estimates biased by misclassification of outcome status.

Authors:  M S Green
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation.

Authors:  R P Nugent; M A Krohn; S L Hillier
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations.

Authors:  R Amsel; P A Totten; C A Spiegel; K C Chen; D Eschenbach; K K Holmes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.965

View more
  2 in total

1.  Binary regression with differentially misclassified response and exposure variables.

Authors:  Li Tang; Robert H Lyles; Caroline C King; David D Celentano; Yungtai Lo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Bias in logistic regression due to imperfect diagnostic test results and practical correction approaches.

Authors:  Denis Valle; Joanna M Tucker Lima; Justin Millar; Punam Amratia; Ubydul Haque
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.979

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.