Literature DB >> 26004961

Fast-track in abdominal aortic surgery: experience in over 1,000 patients.

Piero Brustia1, Alessandra Renghi2, Michele Aronici3, Luca Gramaglia2, Carla Porta1, Antonello Musiani1, Massimiliano Martelli1, Francesco Casella1, Mrancesco Letizia De Simeis1, Giovanni Coppi1, Alberto Settembrini1, Francesca Mottini1, Renato Cassatella1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fast-track recovery programs have led to reduced patient morbidity and mortality after surgery. Minimally invasive surgery and anesthesia, with programs of early postoperative recovery are the main aspects of fast-track recovery programs. The optimization of pain control, early mobilization, and oral feeding allows for a rapid functional rehabilitation, which leads to minor morbidity and early discharge from the hospital to home.
METHODS: We enrolled all nonemergent patients treated for elective abdominal aortic surgery for an aneurysm or obstructive disease from April 2000 to June 2014. The fast-track protocol was applied to all these patients. A transperitoneal aortic approach was used through a left subcostal incision and was complemented with epidural anesthesia-analgesia and a protocol of early rehabilitation.
RESULTS: A total of 1,014 patients were treated for elective aortic surgery. For 980 patients (96.6%), clear liquids followed by a semisolid diet were tolerated starting on the afternoon of the day of intervention (day 0). Nine hundred eighty-seven patients (97.3%) began early ambulation on day 0, and for 81.2% of the population, regular colonic function returned within the second postoperative day. Seventeen deaths (1.7%) occurred. Nine hundred ten patients (89.7%) had no complications. The median hospital length of stay was 3 days for the entire series, and 80.4% of patients (n = 815) were discharged to their homes between the second and fifth days after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The fast-track program can be efficiently and safely applied to aortic surgery and that this program improves surgical outcomes, allows for earlier discharge, and reduces costs.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26004961     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  4 in total

1.  Routine in an Italian High-Volume Vascular Surgery Unit during the COVID-19 Era: How the Pandemic Changed the Vascular Daily Practice.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Mangialardi; Matteo Orrico; Nicola Mangialardi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 1.466

2.  Fast-track endovascular aortic repair: Interim report from the prospective LIFE registry.

Authors:  Zvonimir Krajcer; Venkatesh G Ramaiah; Meredith Huetter; Larry E Miller
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Comparison of perioperative costs with fast-track vs standard endovascular aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Zvonimir Krajcer; Venkatesh G Ramaiah; Esteban A Henao; Wayne K Nelson; Mohammed M Moursi; Hiranya A Rajasinghe; Louise H Anderson; Larry E Miller
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2019-09-03

4.  Enhanced Recovery: A Decade of Experience and Future Prospects at the Mayo Clinic.

Authors:  Jenna K Lovely; David W Larson
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.