BACKGROUND: Information is scant concerning enduring brain injury effects of participation in the contact sport of Rugby Union (hereafter rugby) on early adolescents. OBJECTIVE: The objective was prospectively to investigate differences between young adolescent male rugby players and non-contact sports controls on neurocognitive test performance over 3 years and academic achievement over 6 years. METHOD: A sample of boys from the same school and grade was divided into three groups: rugby with seasonal concussions (n = 45), rugby no seasonal concussions (n = 21) and non-contact sports controls (n = 30). Baseline neurocognitive testing was conducted pre-season in Grade 7 and post-season in Grades 8 and 9. Year-end academic grades were documented for Grades 6-9 and 12 (pre-high school to year of school leaving). A mixed model repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to investigate comparative neurocognitive and academic outcomes between the three sub-groups. RESULTS: Compared with controls, both rugby groups were significantly lower on the WISC-III Coding Immediate Recall sub-test. There was a significant interaction effect on the academic measure, with improved scores over time for controls, that was not in evidence for either rugby group. CONCLUSIONS: Tentatively, the outcome suggests cognitive vulnerability in association with school level participation in rugby.
BACKGROUND: Information is scant concerning enduring brain injury effects of participation in the contact sport of Rugby Union (hereafter rugby) on early adolescents. OBJECTIVE: The objective was prospectively to investigate differences between young adolescent male rugby players and non-contact sports controls on neurocognitive test performance over 3 years and academic achievement over 6 years. METHOD: A sample of boys from the same school and grade was divided into three groups: rugby with seasonal concussions (n = 45), rugby no seasonal concussions (n = 21) and non-contact sports controls (n = 30). Baseline neurocognitive testing was conducted pre-season in Grade 7 and post-season in Grades 8 and 9. Year-end academic grades were documented for Grades 6-9 and 12 (pre-high school to year of school leaving). A mixed model repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to investigate comparative neurocognitive and academic outcomes between the three sub-groups. RESULTS: Compared with controls, both rugby groups were significantly lower on the WISC-III Coding Immediate Recall sub-test. There was a significant interaction effect on the academic measure, with improved scores over time for controls, that was not in evidence for either rugby group. CONCLUSIONS: Tentatively, the outcome suggests cognitive vulnerability in association with school level participation in rugby.
Authors: Patria A Hume; Alice Theadom; Gwyn N Lewis; Kenneth L Quarrie; Scott R Brown; Rosamund Hill; Stephen W Marshall Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Pavel N Lizhnyak; Pretal P Muldoon; Pallavi P Pilaka; John T Povlishock; Andrew K Ottens Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Mark Matthews; William Johnston; Chris M Bleakley; Richard J Davies; Alan T Rankin; Michael Webb; Brian C Caulfield; H A P Archbold Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Mekala Neelakantan; Brinda Ryali; Maria Demma Cabral; Ann Harris; Juli McCarroll; Dilip R Patel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-19 Impact factor: 3.390