Literature DB >> 26004562

Health risk assessment of toxic VOCs species for the coal fire well drillers.

Yulong Yan1, Lin Peng2,3, Na Cheng1, Huiling Bai1, Ling Mu1.   

Abstract

In this study, the health risk of toxic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) species for well drillers, working at an exposure site around a well of underground coal fire site, was presented in a case of Shanxi province. The samples were collected by Teflon sampling bags and measured by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The results showed that isopropyl alcohol was the most abundant compound of VOCs, with the geometric mean concentrations of 1700.38 μg/m(3). The geometric mean concentrations of individual BTEX compounds obtained in all of the sampling campaign were 131.64, 10.15, 15.53, and 25.38 μg/m(3) for benzene, toluene, ethyl-benzene, and xylenes, respectively. Relative proportion of BTEX averaged as 8.5:0.7:1:1.6. High B/T ratio (13.0) and low T/E ratio (0.7) was observed in this study. For non-cancer risk in this study, the hazardous quotient (HQ) of 1,2-dibromoethane, 1,3-butadiene, and benzene was 17.91, 1.71, and 43.88, respectively, mean their non-cancer risk was at the level of definite concern. The HQ sum of 20 VOCs was 64.94, much higher than 1. The cancer risk values of benzene (7.01E-04), 1,2-dibromoethane (1.91E-04), carbon tetrachloride (1.55E-04), and 1,3-butadiene (1.09E-04) were greater than 10(-4), indicating that they were all definite risk. The total cancer risk of all VOCs species was 1.39E-03, almost 14 times more than the level of definite risk. The stochastic exposure assessment of all VOCs species total cancer risk using the Monte Carlo simulation analysis shows that 5 and 95 % cancer risks were predicted to be 7.60E-04 and 2.75E-03, respectively. The cancer risk for all VOCs species is unacceptable. The results of sensitivity analysis show that benzene, carbon tetrachloride, and 1,3-butadiene exposure account for more than 98 % contributions to the estimated risk for drillers, indicating that those VOCs species exposure has greater impact than other species on risk assessment. Both combined effects and independent effects of each VOCs species have to be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BTEX ratios; Coal fire; Health risk assessment; Toxic VOCs species; Well drillers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26004562     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4729-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  18 in total

1.  Levels and sources of personal inhalation exposure to volatile organic compounds.

Authors:  Young Min Kim; Stuart Harrad; Roy M Harrison
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Health risk assessment of personal inhalation exposure to volatile organic compounds in Tianjin, China.

Authors:  Jian Zhou; Yan You; Zhipeng Bai; Yandi Hu; Jiefeng Zhang; Nan Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Significant risk decisions in federal regulatory agencies.

Authors:  J V Rodricks; S M Brett; G C Wrenn
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Health risk assessment of BTEX emissions in the landfill environment.

Authors:  Ertan Durmusoglu; Fatih Taspinar; Aykan Karademir
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 10.588

5.  Gas emissions, minerals, and tars associated with three coal fires, Powder River Basin, USA.

Authors:  Mark A Engle; Lawrence F Radke; Edward L Heffern; Jennifer M K O'Keefe; James C Hower; Charles D Smeltzer; Judith M Hower; Ricardo A Olea; Robert J Eatwell; Donald R Blake; Stephen D Emsbo-Mattingly; Scott A Stout; Gerald Queen; Kerry L Aggen; Allan Kolker; Anupma Prakash; Kevin R Henke; Glenn B Stracher; Paul A Schroeder; Yomayra Román-Colón; Arnout ter Schure
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-02-11       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  CO(2), CO, and Hg emissions from the Truman Shepherd and Ruth Mullins coal fires, eastern Kentucky, USA.

Authors:  Jennifer M K O'Keefe; Kevin R Henke; James C Hower; Mark A Engle; Glenn B Stracher; J D Stucker; Jordan W Drew; Wayne D Staggs; Tiffany M Murray; Maxwell L Hammond; Kenneth D Adkins; Bailey J Mullins; Edward W Lemley
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Patterns of VOC and BTEX concentration in ambient air around industrial sources in Daegu, Korea.

Authors:  Sung-Woo Choi; Sang-Won Park; Chang-Seop Lee; Hye-Jin Kim; Sunyoung Bae; Hilary I Inyang
Journal:  J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.269

8.  Pollution characteristics and health risk assessment of benzene homologues in ambient air in the northeastern urban area of Beijing, China.

Authors:  Lei Li; Hong Li; Xinmin Zhang; Li Wang; Linghong Xu; Xuezhong Wang; Yanting Yu; Yujie Zhang; Guan Cao
Journal:  J Environ Sci (China)       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.565

9.  Characterization of the chronic risk and hazard of hazardous air pollutants in the United States using ambient monitoring data.

Authors:  Michael C McCarthy; Theresa E O'Brien; Jessica G Charrier; Hilary R Hafner
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Comparative assessment of air pollution-related health risks in Houston.

Authors:  Ken Sexton; Stephen H Linder; Dritana Marko; Heidi Bethel; Philip J Lupo
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  1,3-Butadiene: a ubiquitous environmental mutagen and its associations with diseases.

Authors:  Wan-Qi Chen; Xin-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Genes Environ       Date:  2022-01-10

2.  External Exposure to BTEX, Internal Biomarker Response, and Health Risk Assessment of Nonoccupational Populations near a Coking Plant in Southwest China.

Authors:  Ning Qin; Yuanyuan Zhu; Yan Zhong; Jing Tian; Jihua Li; Laiguo Chen; Ruifang Fan; Fusheng Wei
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.