Ahmed Q Haddad1, Bradley C Leibovich2, Edwin Jason Abel3, Jun-Hang Luo1, Laura-Maria Krabbe4, Robert Houston Thompson5, Jennifer E Heckman3, Megan M Merrill6, Bishoy A Gayed1, Arthur I Sagalowsky1, Stephen A Boorjian5, Christopher G Wood6, Vitaly Margulis7. 1. Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 2. Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3. Department of Urology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison WI. 4. Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; University of Muenster Medical Center, Muenster, Germany. 5. Department of Urology, Mayo Medical School and Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 6. Department of Urology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 7. Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. Electronic address: vmargu@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with suprahepatic inferior vena cava tumor thrombus is associated with significant morbidity, yet there are currently no tools for preoperative prognostic evaluation. Our goal was to develop a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of survival and risk of major complications in patients with suprahepatic thrombi. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent surgery for RCC with suprahepatic tumor thrombus extension from 2000 to 2013 at 4 tertiary centers. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for analysis of overall survival (OS) and logistic regression was used for major complications within 90 days of surgery (Clavien ≥ 3A). Nomograms were internally calibrated by bootstrap resampling method. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients with level III thrombus and 83 patients with level IV thrombus were identified. During median follow-up of 24.5 months, 80 patients (60.6%) died and 46 patients (34.8%) experienced major complication. Independent prognostic factors for OS included distant metastases at presentation (hazard ratio = 2.52, P = 0.002) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (hazard ratio = 1.84, P<0.0001). Variables associated with increased risk of major complications on univariate analysis included preoperative systemic symptoms, level IV thrombus, and elevated preoperative alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase levels; however, only systemic symptoms (odds ratio = 8.45, P<0.0001) was an independent prognostic factor. Preoperative nomograms achieved a concordance index of 0.72 for OS and 0.83 for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and internally validated multivariable preoperative models for the prediction of survival and major complications in patients with RCC who have a suprahepatic inferior vena cava thrombus. If externally validated, these tools may aid in patient selection for surgical intervention.
OBJECTIVE: Surgical resection for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with suprahepatic inferior vena cava tumor thrombus is associated with significant morbidity, yet there are currently no tools for preoperative prognostic evaluation. Our goal was to develop a preoperative multivariable model for prediction of survival and risk of major complications in patients with suprahepatic thrombi. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent surgery for RCC with suprahepatic tumor thrombus extension from 2000 to 2013 at 4 tertiary centers. A Cox proportional hazard model was used for analysis of overall survival (OS) and logistic regression was used for major complications within 90 days of surgery (Clavien ≥ 3A). Nomograms were internally calibrated by bootstrap resampling method. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients with level III thrombus and 83 patients with level IV thrombus were identified. During median follow-up of 24.5 months, 80 patients (60.6%) died and 46 patients (34.8%) experienced major complication. Independent prognostic factors for OS included distant metastases at presentation (hazard ratio = 2.52, P = 0.002) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (hazard ratio = 1.84, P<0.0001). Variables associated with increased risk of major complications on univariate analysis included preoperative systemic symptoms, level IV thrombus, and elevated preoperative alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase levels; however, only systemic symptoms (odds ratio = 8.45, P<0.0001) was an independent prognostic factor. Preoperative nomograms achieved a concordance index of 0.72 for OS and 0.83 for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and internally validated multivariable preoperative models for the prediction of survival and major complications in patients with RCC who have a suprahepatic inferior vena cava thrombus. If externally validated, these tools may aid in patient selection for surgical intervention.
Authors: Charles C Peyton; E Jason Abel; Juan Chipollini; David C Boulware; Mounsif Azizi; Jose A Karam; Vitaly Margulis; Viraj A Master; Surena F Matin; Jay D Raman; Wade J Sexton; Christopher G Wood; Philippe E Spiess Journal: Eur Urol Focus Date: 2018-09-08
Authors: Alberto C Pieretti; Manuel Ozambela; Mary E Westerman; Graciela M Nogueras-Gonzalez; Luis A Segarra; Niki M Zacharias; Ara Vaporciyan; Wayne Hofstetter; Tam Huynh; Saad Aldousari; Surena F Matin; Jose A Karam Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 3.121
Authors: Brian M Shinder; Kevin Rhee; Douglas Farrell; Nicholas J Farber; Mark N Stein; Thomas L Jang; Eric A Singer Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2017-05-31 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Montserrat Pérez Pinar; Regina Pastor Toledo; Luis Broseta Viana; Julián Solís García Del Pozo Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci Date: 2017-03-06