OBJECTIVES: In 2009, a transcatheter valve intervention program was introduced at our centre. The aim of this single-centre retrospective study was to evaluate gender-specific risk profiles and outcome of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement before and after 2009. METHODS: We assessed the preoperative logistic EuroSCORE and age, gender and 30-day-survival of 357 patients diagnosed with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis that underwent primary isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in 2007-2008 (group I, n = 191, 47% female) and 2010-2011 (group II, n = 166, 40% female). Survival follow up data was 100% complete. RESULTS: Women in group II were significantly younger (71.6 ± 9.0 years; p = 0.004) and showed significantly lower risk profiles (logistic EuroSCORE: 9.6 ± 9.9%; p = 0.04) than women in group I (age: 75.6 ± 8.5 years, logistic EuroSCORE: 13.9 ± 15.9). Men's age and risk profiles remained similar in both groups. Observed survival at 30 days was 98.8% in group II and 95.8% in group I which represented a statistical trend (p = 0.09). Female survival in group I was 92.2% and significantly worse as compared to 99% male survival in group I (p = 0.03). This significant difference in gender ratio of mortality was not detected in group II (female survival 97%, male survival 100%; p = 0.2). Being female was a significant risk factor in group I (odds ratio; 8.4; p = 0.03) but not in group II any longer (odds ratio: 1.0; p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for therapy of aortic stenosis has led to a lower risk and improved outcome of surgical aortic valve replacement especially for women.
OBJECTIVES: In 2009, a transcatheter valve intervention program was introduced at our centre. The aim of this single-centre retrospective study was to evaluate gender-specific risk profiles and outcome of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement before and after 2009. METHODS: We assessed the preoperative logistic EuroSCORE and age, gender and 30-day-survival of 357 patients diagnosed with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis that underwent primary isolated surgical aortic valve replacement in 2007-2008 (group I, n = 191, 47% female) and 2010-2011 (group II, n = 166, 40% female). Survival follow up data was 100% complete. RESULTS:Women in group II were significantly younger (71.6 ± 9.0 years; p = 0.004) and showed significantly lower risk profiles (logistic EuroSCORE: 9.6 ± 9.9%; p = 0.04) than women in group I (age: 75.6 ± 8.5 years, logistic EuroSCORE: 13.9 ± 15.9). Men's age and risk profiles remained similar in both groups. Observed survival at 30 days was 98.8% in group II and 95.8% in group I which represented a statistical trend (p = 0.09). Female survival in group I was 92.2% and significantly worse as compared to 99% male survival in group I (p = 0.03). This significant difference in gender ratio of mortality was not detected in group II (female survival 97%, male survival 100%; p = 0.2). Being female was a significant risk factor in group I (odds ratio; 8.4; p = 0.03) but not in group II any longer (odds ratio: 1.0; p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement for therapy of aortic stenosis has led to a lower risk and improved outcome of surgical aortic valve replacement especially for women.
Authors: F Roques; S A Nashef; P Michel; E Gauducheau; C de Vincentiis; E Baudet; J Cortina; M David; A Faichney; F Gabrielle; E Gams; A Harjula; M T Jones; P P Pintor; R Salamon; L Thulin Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 1999-06 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Samer A M Nashef; François Roques; Linda D Sharples; Johan Nilsson; Christopher Smith; Antony R Goldstone; Ulf Lockowandt Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Corrado Tamburino; Davide Capodanno; Angelo Ramondo; Anna Sonia Petronio; Federica Ettori; Gennaro Santoro; Silvio Klugmann; Francesco Bedogni; Francesco Maisano; Antonio Marzocchi; Arnaldo Poli; David Antoniucci; Massimo Napodano; Marco De Carlo; Claudia Fiorina; Gian Paolo Ussia Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-01-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Susheel K Kodali; Mathew R Williams; Craig R Smith; Lars G Svensson; John G Webb; Raj R Makkar; Gregory P Fontana; Todd M Dewey; Vinod H Thourani; Augusto D Pichard; Michael Fischbein; Wilson Y Szeto; Scott Lim; Kevin L Greason; Paul S Teirstein; S Chris Malaisrie; Pamela S Douglas; Rebecca T Hahn; Brian Whisenant; Alan Zajarias; Duolao Wang; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Martin B Leon Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John Chalmers; Mark Pullan; Brian Fabri; James McShane; Matthew Shaw; Neeraj Mediratta; Michael Poullis Journal: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 4.191
Authors: Alain Cribier; Helene Eltchaninoff; Assaf Bash; Nicolas Borenstein; Christophe Tron; Fabrice Bauer; Genevieve Derumeaux; Frederic Anselme; François Laborde; Martin B Leon Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-12-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: F Schwarz; P Baumann; J Manthey; M Hoffmann; G Schuler; H C Mehmel; W Schmitz; W Kübler Journal: Circulation Date: 1982-11 Impact factor: 29.690