Literature DB >> 26004061

Increased motor preparation activity during fluent single word production in DS: A correlate for stuttering frequency and severity.

Sarah Vanhoutte1, Patrick Santens2, Marjan Cosyns3, Pieter van Mierlo4, Katja Batens5, Paul Corthals6, Miet De Letter7, John Van Borsel8.   

Abstract

Abnormal speech motor preparation is suggested to be a neural characteristic of stuttering. One of the neurophysiological substrates of motor preparation is the contingent negative variation (CNV). The CNV is an event-related, slow negative potential that occurs between two defined stimuli. Unfortunately, CNV tasks are rarely studied in developmental stuttering (DS). Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate motor preparation in DS by use of a CNV task. Twenty five adults who stutter (AWS) and 35 fluent speakers (FS) were included. They performed a picture naming task while an electro-encephalogram was recorded. The slope of the CNV was evaluated at frontal, central and parietal electrode sites. In addition, a correlation analysis was performed with stuttering severity and frequency measures. There was a marked increase in CNV slope in AWS as compared to FS. This increase was observed over the entire scalp with respect to stimulus onset, and only over the right hemisphere with respect to lip movement onset. Moreover, strong positive correlations were found between CNV slope and stuttering frequency and severity. As the CNV is known to reflect the activity in the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical-network, the present findings confirm an increased activation of this loop during speech motor preparation in stuttering. The more a person stutters, the more neurons of this cortical-subcortical network seem to be activated. Because this increased CNV slope was observed during fluent single word production, it is discussed whether or not this observation refers to a successful compensation strategy.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Basal ganglia; Compensation; Contingent negative variation; Dopamine; Motor preparation; Stuttering frequency; Stuttering severity

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26004061     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  5 in total

1.  Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Emily O Garnett; Andrew Etchell; Ho Ming Chow
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 7.519

2.  Shifted dynamic interactions between subcortical nuclei and inferior frontal gyri during response preparation in persistent developmental stuttering.

Authors:  F Luise Metzger; Tibor Auer; Gunther Helms; Walter Paulus; Jens Frahm; Martin Sommer; Nicole E Neef
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  Speech Timing Deficit of Stuttering: Evidence from Contingent Negative Variations.

Authors:  Ning Ning; Danling Peng; Xiangping Liu; Shuang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Neural Marker of Speech Intention: Evidence From Contingent Negative Variation.

Authors:  Juhi Kidwai; Jonathan S Brumberg; Brianna M Marsh
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Overexpression of human NR2B receptor subunit in LMAN causes stuttering and song sequence changes in adult zebra finches.

Authors:  Mukta Chakraborty; Liang-Fu Chen; Emma E Fridel; Marguerita E Klein; Rebecca A Senft; Abhra Sarkar; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.