Andrea L Wirtz1, Alena Peryshkina2, Vladimir Mogilniy2, Chris Beyrer3, Michele R Decker4. 1. Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Department of Emergency Medicine, Baltimore, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, USA. Electronic address: awirtz1@jhu.edu. 2. AIDS Infoshare, Moscow, Russian Federation. 3. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, USA. 4. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Public Health and Human Rights, Department of Epidemiology, Baltimore, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Population, Family & Reproductive Health, Baltimore, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Female sex workers (FSW) and people who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for HIV infection, with FSW-PWID at even greater risk. HIV-related research often focuses on the primary mode of transmission - sexual or parenteral transmission for FSW and PWID, respectively - with less known on how sex work and injection drug use (IDU) are collectively associated with the risk environment experienced by sex workers. We investigated this relationship among FSW in three Russian cities. METHODS: In 2011, FSWs (N=754) in Tomsk, Krasnoyarsk, and Kazan were recruited via respondent-driven sampling and completed a survey and rapid HIV screening. Multivariable models evaluated the role of injection history (classified as active: last 6 months, former: prior to last 6 months, and never) with a set of sexual and structural HIV risk outcomes. RESULTS: IDU was common: 11% actively injected drugs and 11% were former injectors. HIV infection was most prevalent among active injectors (AOR: 6.7; 95% CI: 2.4-18.9) and former injectors (AOR:4.5; 95%CI: 1.7-11.6), compared to non-injectors. Some 6-8% of non-injecting FSWs reported recent physical or sexual client violence and 23% police extortion. Compared to these non-injectors, active injecting was associated with unprotected anal sex (AOR: 2.8, 95%CI: 1.2-6.4), client violence (AOR: 7.3, 95%CI: 2.1-24.7), and police extortion (AOR: 3.0 95%CI: 1.5-5.9%). Self-reported sexual and structural risk outcomes were also more prevalent among active compared to former injectors; however, few differences existed between former and non-injectors. CONCLUSIONS: FSW experience sexual, structural, and HIV risk outcomes and these risks are amplified for actively injecting FSWs. FSW who stopped injecting drugs demonstrated risk profiles closer to those of sex workers who had no history of injection. HIV prevention programs and outreach can provide opportunities to include harm reduction interventions and linkage to treatment for FSW to move FSWs towards lower risk environments.
BACKGROUND: Female sex workers (FSW) and people who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for HIV infection, with FSW-PWID at even greater risk. HIV-related research often focuses on the primary mode of transmission - sexual or parenteral transmission for FSW and PWID, respectively - with less known on how sex work and injection drug use (IDU) are collectively associated with the risk environment experienced by sex workers. We investigated this relationship among FSW in three Russian cities. METHODS: In 2011, FSWs (N=754) in Tomsk, Krasnoyarsk, and Kazan were recruited via respondent-driven sampling and completed a survey and rapid HIV screening. Multivariable models evaluated the role of injection history (classified as active: last 6 months, former: prior to last 6 months, and never) with a set of sexual and structural HIV risk outcomes. RESULTS: IDU was common: 11% actively injected drugs and 11% were former injectors. HIV infection was most prevalent among active injectors (AOR: 6.7; 95% CI: 2.4-18.9) and former injectors (AOR:4.5; 95%CI: 1.7-11.6), compared to non-injectors. Some 6-8% of non-injecting FSWs reported recent physical or sexual client violence and 23% police extortion. Compared to these non-injectors, active injecting was associated with unprotected anal sex (AOR: 2.8, 95%CI: 1.2-6.4), client violence (AOR: 7.3, 95%CI: 2.1-24.7), and police extortion (AOR: 3.0 95%CI: 1.5-5.9%). Self-reported sexual and structural risk outcomes were also more prevalent among active compared to former injectors; however, few differences existed between former and non-injectors. CONCLUSIONS: FSW experience sexual, structural, and HIV risk outcomes and these risks are amplified for actively injecting FSWs. FSW who stopped injecting drugs demonstrated risk profiles closer to those of sex workers who had no history of injection. HIV prevention programs and outreach can provide opportunities to include harm reduction interventions and linkage to treatment for FSW to move FSWs towards lower risk environments.
Authors: Sushena Reza-Paul; Tara Beattie; Hafeez Ur Rahman Syed; Koppal T Venukumar; Mysore S Venugopal; Mary P Fathima; H R Raghavendra; Pasha Akram; Ramaiah Manjula; M Lakshmi; Shajy Isac; Banadakoppa M Ramesh; Reynold Washington; Sangameshwar B Mahagaonkar; Judith R Glynn; James F Blanchard; Stephen Moses Journal: AIDS Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Michele R Decker; Andrea L Wirtz; Carel Pretorius; Susan G Sherman; Michael D Sweat; Stefan D Baral; Chris Beyrer; Deanna L Kerrigan Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Louisa Degenhardt; Bradley M Mathers; Andrea L Wirtz; Daniel Wolfe; Adeeba Kamarulzaman; M Patrizia Carrieri; Steffanie A Strathdee; Kasia Malinowska-Sempruch; Michel Kazatchkine; Chris Beyrer Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2013-09-04
Authors: Kate Shannon; Steffanie A Strathdee; Shira M Goldenberg; Putu Duff; Peninah Mwangi; Maia Rusakova; Sushena Reza-Paul; Joseph Lau; Kathleen Deering; Michael R Pickles; Marie-Claude Boily Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-07-22 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Steffanie A Strathdee; Timothy B Hallett; Natalia Bobrova; Tim Rhodes; Robert Booth; Reychad Abdool; Catherine A Hankins Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tara S H Beattie; Parinita Bhattacharjee; B M Ramesh; Vandana Gurnani; John Anthony; Shajy Isac; H L Mohan; Aparajita Ramakrishnan; Tisha Wheeler; Janet Bradley; James F Blanchard; Stephen Moses Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Margaret H Wurth; Rebecca Schleifer; Megan McLemore; Katherine W Todrys; Joseph J Amon Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Ezequiel Blumenkrans; M Eugenia Socías; Lindsey Richardson; Thomas Kerr; Jean Shoveller; Julio Montaner; M-J Milloy Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2020-07
Authors: Ju Nyeong Park; Katherine H A Footer; Michele R Decker; Catherine Tomko; Sean T Allen; Noya Galai; Susan G Sherman Journal: Addiction Date: 2019-03-03 Impact factor: 6.526
Authors: Joseph G Rosen; Ju Nyeong Park; Kristin E Schneider; Rebecca Hamilton White; S Wilson Beckham; Jennifer L Glick; Katherine H A Footer; Susan G Sherman Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Kate Shannon; Anna-Louise Crago; Stefan D Baral; Linda-Gail Bekker; Deanna Kerrigan; Michele R Decker; Tonia Poteat; Andrea L Wirtz; Brian Weir; Marie-Claude Boily; Jenny Butler; Steffanie A Strathdee; Chris Beyrer Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-07-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Shannon N Ogden; Miriam Th Harris; Ellen Childs; Pablo K Valente; Alberto Edeza; Alexandra B Collins; Mari-Lynn Drainoni; Matthew J Mimiaga; Katie B Biello; Angela R Bazzi Journal: Int J Drug Policy Date: 2021-05-10
Authors: Brooke S West; Milagros Becerra Ramirez; Claire C Bristow; Daniela A Abramovitz; Alicia Vera; Hugo Staines; M Gudelia Rangel; Thomas L Patterson; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2020-07-05 Impact factor: 1.456
Authors: Michele R Decker; Catherine Tomko; Erin Wingo; Anne Sawyer; Sarah Peitzmeier; Nancy Glass; Susan G Sherman Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rebecca Hamilton White; Allison O'Rourke; Michael E Kilkenny; Kristin E Schneider; Brian W Weir; Suzanne M Grieb; Susan G Sherman; Sean T Allen Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-07-14 Impact factor: 6.526