Literature DB >> 26003590

Workplace-based assessment: a review of user perceptions and strategies to address the identified shortcomings.

Jonathan Massie1, Jason M Ali2.   

Abstract

Workplace based assessments (WBAs) are now commonplace in postgraduate medical training. User acceptability and engagement is essential to the success of any medical education innovation. To this end, possessing an insight into trainee and trainer perceptions towards WBAs will help identify the major problems, permitting strategies to be introduced to improve WBA implementation. A review of literature was performed to identify studies examining trainee and trainer perceptions towards WBAs. Studies were excluded if non-English or sampling a non-medical/dental population. The identified literature was synthesised for the purpose of this critical narrative review. It is clear that there is widespread negativity towards WBAs in the workplace. This has negatively impacted on the effectiveness of WBA tools as learning aids. This negativity exists in trainees but also to an extent in their trainers. Insight gained from the literature reveals three dominant problems with WBA implementation: poor understanding as to the purpose of WBAs; insufficient time available for undertaking these assessments; and inadequate training of trainers. Approaches to addressing these three problems with WBA implementation are discussed. It is likely that a variety of solutions will be required. The prevalence of negativity towards WBAs is substantial in both trainees and trainers, eroding the effectiveness of learning that is consequent upon them. The educational community must now listen to the concerns being raised by the users and consider the range of strategies being proposed to improve the experiences of trainees, and their trainers.

Keywords:  Engagement; Implementation; Perceptions; SLEs; Supervised learning events; Trainees; Trainers; WBAs; Workplace based assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003590     DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9614-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  29 in total

1.  Exploring How the New Entrustable Professional Activity Assessment Tools Affect the Quality of Feedback Given to Medical Oncology Residents.

Authors:  Anna Tomiak; Heather Braund; Rylan Egan; Nancy Dalgarno; Jeffrey Emack; Mary-Anne Reid; Nazik Hammad
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Acceptability and feasibility of the standardized direct observation assessment tool in the emergency department in Qatar.

Authors:  Saleem Farook; Sohaib Chaudhry; Baha Al Kahlout; Furqan B Irfan; Sameer A Pathan
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-12-21

3.  The validity of the Annual Review of Competence Progression: a qualitative interview study of the perceptions of junior doctors and their trainers.

Authors:  Rowena Viney; Antonia Rich; Sarah Needleman; Ann Griffin; Katherine Woolf
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Four ways to get a grip on making robust decisions from workplace-based assessments.

Authors:  Tim J Wilkinson
Journal:  Can Med Educ J       Date:  2022-07-06

5.  Trust, power and learning in workplace-based assessment: The trainee perspective.

Authors:  Damian J Castanelli; Jennifer M Weller; Elizabeth Molloy; Margaret Bearman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 7.647

6.  Workplace-Based Assessments Using Pediatric Critical Care Entrustable Professional Activities.

Authors:  Amanda R Emke; Yoon Soo Park; Sushant Srinivasan; Ara Tekian
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-08

7.  Workplace-based assessments of entrustable professional activities in a psychiatry core clerkship: an observational study.

Authors:  Severin Pinilla; Alexandra Kyrou; Stefan Klöppel; Werner Strik; Christoph Nissen; Sören Huwendiek
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 8.  Assessing professional competence: a critical review of the Annual Review of Competence Progression.

Authors:  Katherine Woolf; Michael Page; Rowena Viney
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  Guidelines: the do's, don'ts and don't knows of feedback for clinical education.

Authors:  Janet Lefroy; Chris Watling; Pim W Teunissen; Paul Brand
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

10.  McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP) Through the Years: Residents' Experience With an Evolving Feedback Culture Over a 3-year Period.

Authors:  Shelly-Anne Li; Jonathan Sherbino; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2017-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.