Kelly Gilmore1, Andrea J Hoopes2, Janet Cady3, Anne-Marie Amies Oelschlager4, Sarah Prager4, Ann Vander Stoep5. 1. Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: kellyg18@uw.edu. 2. Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 3. Neighborcare Health, Seattle, Washington. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 5. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and Department of Epidemiology, University or Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation of a program that provides long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services within school-based health centers (SBHCs) and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation as reported by SBHC clinicians and administrators, public health officials, and community partners. METHODS: We conducted 14 semistructured interviews with key informants involved in the implementation of LARC services. Key informants included SBHC clinicians and administrators, public health officials, and community partners. We used a content analysis approach to analyze interview transcripts for themes. We explored barriers to and facilitators of LARC service delivery across and within key informant groups. RESULTS: The most cited barriers across key informant groups were as follows: perceived lack of provider procedural skills and bias and negative attitudes about LARC methods. The most common facilitators identified across groups were as follows: clear communication strategies, contraceptive counseling practice changes, provider trainings, and stakeholder engagement. Two additional barriers emerged in specific key informant groups. Technical and logistical barriers to LARC service delivery were cited heavily by SBHC administrative staff, community partners, and public health officials. Expense and billing was a major barrier to SBHC administrative staff. CONCLUSIONS: LARC counseling and procedural services can be implemented in an SBHC setting to promote access to effective contraceptive options for adolescent women.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation of a program that provides long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services within school-based health centers (SBHCs) and to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation as reported by SBHC clinicians and administrators, public health officials, and community partners. METHODS: We conducted 14 semistructured interviews with key informants involved in the implementation of LARC services. Key informants included SBHC clinicians and administrators, public health officials, and community partners. We used a content analysis approach to analyze interview transcripts for themes. We explored barriers to and facilitators of LARC service delivery across and within key informant groups. RESULTS: The most cited barriers across key informant groups were as follows: perceived lack of provider procedural skills and bias and negative attitudes about LARC methods. The most common facilitators identified across groups were as follows: clear communication strategies, contraceptive counseling practice changes, provider trainings, and stakeholder engagement. Two additional barriers emerged in specific key informant groups. Technical and logistical barriers to LARC service delivery were cited heavily by SBHC administrative staff, community partners, and public health officials. Expense and billing was a major barrier to SBHC administrative staff. CONCLUSIONS: LARC counseling and procedural services can be implemented in an SBHC setting to promote access to effective contraceptive options for adolescent women.
Authors: Andrea J Hoopes; Kym R Ahrens; Kelly Gilmore; Janet Cady; Wren L Haaland; Anne-Marie Amies Oelschlager; Sarah Prager Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2016-04-11
Authors: Anna W Brittain; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Emily Decker; Julia M Rollison; Nikita M Malcolm; Lisa M Romero; Emilia H Koumans Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Emily R Boniface; Maria I Rodriguez; John Heintzman; Sarah H Knipper; Rebecca Jacobs; Blair G Darney Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Amani Idris Kikula; Candida Moshiro; Naku Makoko; Eunyoung Park; Andrea Barnabas Pembe Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 3.390