Literature DB >> 26003489

Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.

Corinna E Bonhage1, Jutta L Mueller2, Angela D Friederici3, Christian J Fiebach4.   

Abstract

It is widely agreed upon that linguistic predictions are an integral part of language comprehension. Yet, experimental proof of their existence remains challenging. Here, we introduce a new predictive eye gaze reading task combining eye tracking and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) that allows us to infer the existence and timing of linguistic predictions via anticipatory eye-movements. Participants read different types of word sequences (i.e., regular sentences, meaningless jabberwocky sentences, non-word lists) up to the pre-final word. The final target word was displayed with a temporal delay and its screen position was dependent on the syntactic word category (nouns vs verbs). During the delay, anticipatory eye-movements into the correct target word area were indicative of linguistic predictions. For fMRI analysis, the predictive sentence conditions were contrasted to the non-word condition, with the anticipatory eye-movements specifying differences in timing across conditions. A conjunction analysis of both sentence conditions revealed the neural substrate of word category prediction, namely a distributed network of cortical and subcortical brain regions including language systems, basal ganglia, thalamus, and hippocampus. Direct contrasts between the regular sentence condition and the jabberwocky condition indicate that prediction of word category in meaningless jabberwocky sentences relies on classical left-hemispheric language systems involving Brodman's area 44/45 in the left inferior frontal gyrus, left superior temporal areas, and the dorsal caudate nucleus. Regular sentences, in contrast, allowed for the prediction of specific words. Word-specific predictions were specifically associated with more widely distributed temporal and parietal cortical systems, most prominently in the right hemisphere. Our results support the presence of linguistic predictions during sentence processing and demonstrate the validity of the predictive eye gaze paradigm for measuring syntactic and semantic aspects of linguistic predictions, as well as for investigating their neural substrates.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eye tracking; Language; Prediction; Syntax; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003489     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  20 in total

1.  fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension.

Authors:  Cory Shain; Idan Asher Blank; Marten van Schijndel; William Schuler; Evelina Fedorenko
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Universal neural basis of structure building evidenced by network modulations emerging from Broca's area: The case of Chinese.

Authors:  Chiao-Yi Wu; Emiliano Zaccarella; Angela D Friederici
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Mouse-tracking evidence for parallel anticipatory option evaluation.

Authors:  Edward A Cranford; Jarrod Moss
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-12-23

4.  Cerebellar Theta and Beta Noninvasive Stimulation Rhythms Differentially Influence Episodic Memory versus Semantic Prediction.

Authors:  Shruti Dave; Stephen VanHaerents; Joel L Voss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The Cortical Organization of Syntax.

Authors:  William Matchin; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Expanding the Language Network: Direct Contributions from the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Natalie V Covington; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Visualization of Data Regarding Infections Using Eye Tracking Techniques.

Authors:  Sunmoo Yoon; Bevin Cohen; Kenrick D Cato; Jianfang Liu; Elaine L Larson
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.176

8.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Emergence of the neural network underlying phonological processing from the prereading to the emergent reading stage: A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Xi Yu; Talia Raney; Meaghan V Perdue; Jennifer Zuk; Ola Ozernov-Palchik; Bryce L C Becker; Nora M Raschle; Nadine Gaab
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Tracking Cognitive Spare Capacity During Speech Perception With EEG/ERP: Effects of Cognitive Load and Sentence Predictability.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.