| Literature DB >> 2600314 |
C E Gelfer1, F Bell-Berti, K S Harris.
Abstract
The purpose of this letter is to explore some reasons for what appear to be conflicting reports regarding the nature and extent of anticipatory coarticulation, in general, and anticipatory lip rounding, in particular. Analyses of labial electromyographic and kinematic data using a minimal-pair paradigm allowed for the differentiation of consonantal and vocalic effects, supporting a frame versus a feature-spreading model of coarticulation. It is believed that the apparent conflicts of previous studies of anticipatory coarticulation might be resolved if experimental design made more use of contrastive minimal pairs and relied less on assumptions about feature specifications of phones.Mesh:
Year: 1989 PMID: 2600314 DOI: 10.1121/1.398452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Acoust Soc Am ISSN: 0001-4966 Impact factor: 1.840