Matthew D Hellmann1, Isrid Sturm2, Zuzana Jirakova Trnkova2, John Lettieri3, Konstanze Diefenbach2, Naiyer A Rizvi4, Scott N Gettinger5. 1. Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. Electronic address: hellmanm@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Clinical Pharmacology Oncology, Bayer HealthCare, Berlin, Germany. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacology Oncology, Bayer HealthCare, Whippany, NJ. 4. Thoracic Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. 5. Department of Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Regorafenib is an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor with potent antiangiogenic activity. In this phase I trial we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of regorafenib with cisplatin and pemetrexed for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancers (nsNSCLCs). Nine patients enrolled before premature termination of the study. Five of 9 (56%) patients had a partial response and the median progression-free survival was 7 months (range, 1.5-15.1 months). Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability and minor pharmacokinetic interactions in combination with standard doses of cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. BACKGROUND: The combination of bevacizumab, an antiangiogenesis agent, with cytotoxic chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancers (nsNSCLCs). Regorafenib is an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor with potent antiangiogenic activity that is approved for patients with advanced colorectal cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. In this phase I trial we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of regorafenib with cisplatin and pemetrexed for patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nsNSCLCs were treated with regorafenib 60 mg/d continuously and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) once every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Thereafter, regorafenib with or without pemetrexed could be continued as maintenance. RESULTS: Nine patients enrolled before premature termination of the study because of slow recruitment and a change in the development strategy of regorafenib by the study sponsor. Five patients experienced at least 1 treatment-related Grade 3 adverse event. No Grade 4 or 5 toxicity occurred. Five of 9 (56%) patients had a partial response and the median progression-free survival was 7 months (range, 1.5-15.1 months). Minor PK interactions between regorafenib and chemotherapy were observed. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability and minor PK interactions in combination with standard doses of cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. Encouraging activity was appreciated in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. However, the small number of patients treated limits conclusions that can be drawn from these results.
UNLABELLED: Regorafenib is an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor with potent antiangiogenic activity. In this phase I trial we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of regorafenib with cisplatin and pemetrexed for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancers (nsNSCLCs). Nine patients enrolled before premature termination of the study. Five of 9 (56%) patients had a partial response and the median progression-free survival was 7 months (range, 1.5-15.1 months). Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability and minor pharmacokinetic interactions in combination with standard doses of cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. BACKGROUND: The combination of bevacizumab, an antiangiogenesis agent, with cytotoxic chemotherapy improves survival in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancers (nsNSCLCs). Regorafenib is an oral multitargeted kinase inhibitor with potent antiangiogenic activity that is approved for patients with advanced colorectal cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. In this phase I trial we evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of regorafenib with cisplatin and pemetrexed for patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nsNSCLCs were treated with regorafenib 60 mg/d continuously and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) with pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) once every 21 days for up to 6 cycles. Thereafter, regorafenib with or without pemetrexed could be continued as maintenance. RESULTS: Nine patients enrolled before premature termination of the study because of slow recruitment and a change in the development strategy of regorafenib by the study sponsor. Five patients experienced at least 1 treatment-related Grade 3 adverse event. No Grade 4 or 5 toxicity occurred. Five of 9 (56%) patients had a partial response and the median progression-free survival was 7 months (range, 1.5-15.1 months). Minor PK interactions between regorafenib and chemotherapy were observed. CONCLUSION:Regorafenib had acceptable tolerability and minor PK interactions in combination with standard doses of cisplatin and pemetrexed in patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. Encouraging activity was appreciated in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nsNSCLCs. However, the small number of patients treated limits conclusions that can be drawn from these results.
Authors: W S Lofters; J L Pater; B Zee; E Dempsey; D Walde; J P Moquin; K Wilson; P Hoskins; R M Guevin; S Verma; R Navari; J E Krook; J Hainsworth; M Palmer; C Chin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Miles A Fabian; William H Biggs; Daniel K Treiber; Corey E Atteridge; Mihai D Azimioara; Michael G Benedetti; Todd A Carter; Pietro Ciceri; Philip T Edeen; Mark Floyd; Julia M Ford; Margaret Galvin; Jay L Gerlach; Robert M Grotzfeld; Sanna Herrgard; Darren E Insko; Michael A Insko; Andiliy G Lai; Jean-Michel Lélias; Shamal A Mehta; Zdravko V Milanov; Anne Marie Velasco; Lisa M Wodicka; Hitesh K Patel; Patrick P Zarrinkar; David J Lockhart Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2005-02-13 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Giorgio Scagliotti; Silvia Novello; Joachim von Pawel; Martin Reck; José Rodrigues Pereira; Michael Thomas; José Elias Abrão Miziara; Beatrix Balint; Filippo De Marinis; Alan Keller; Osvaldo Arén; Maria Csollak; Istvan Albert; Carlos Henrique Barrios; Francesco Grossi; Maciej Krzakowski; Lisa Cupit; Frank Cihon; Sandra Dimatteo; Nasser Hanna Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P Hesketh; R Navari; T Grote; R Gralla; J Hainsworth; M Kris; L Anthony; A Khojasteh; E Tapazoglou; C Benedict; W Hahne Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alan Sandler; Robert Gray; Michael C Perry; Julie Brahmer; Joan H Schiller; Afshin Dowlati; Rogerio Lilenbaum; David H Johnson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-12-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Martin Reck; Joachim von Pawel; Petr Zatloukal; Rodryg Ramlau; Vera Gorbounova; Vera Hirsh; Natasha Leighl; Jörg Mezger; Venice Archer; Nicola Moore; Christian Manegold Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M G Kris; S M Grunberg; R J Gralla; L Baltzer; S A Zaretsky; D Lifsey; L B Tyson; L Schmidt; W F Hahne Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1994-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Purvish Parikh; Joachim von Pawel; Bonne Biesma; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Piotr Serwatowski; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Mauro Zukin; Jin S Lee; Anders Mellemgaard; Keunchil Park; Shehkar Patil; Janusz Rolski; Tuncay Goksel; Filippo de Marinis; Lorinda Simms; Katherine P Sugarman; David Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Scott M Wilhelm; Christopher Carter; Liya Tang; Dean Wilkie; Angela McNabola; Hong Rong; Charles Chen; Xiaomei Zhang; Patrick Vincent; Mark McHugh; Yichen Cao; Jaleel Shujath; Susan Gawlak; Deepa Eveleigh; Bruce Rowley; Li Liu; Lila Adnane; Mark Lynch; Daniel Auclair; Ian Taylor; Rich Gedrich; Andrei Voznesensky; Bernd Riedl; Leonard E Post; Gideon Bollag; Pamela A Trail Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 13.312
Authors: Torsten Zimmermann; Joachim Höchel; Michael Becka; Michael K Boettger; Beate Rohde; Barbara Schug; Kathleen S Kunert; Frank Donath Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Armin Sebastian Guntner; Andreas Peyrl; Lisa Mayr; Bernhard Englinger; Walter Berger; Irene Slavc; Wolfgang Buchberger; Johannes Gojo Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2020-06-03 Impact factor: 7.801