Literature DB >> 26002938

Academic dishonesty among health science school students.

Nazan Tuna Oran, Hafize Öztürk Can, Selmin Şenol, Aytül Pelik Hadımlı1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Academic dishonesty has become a serious problem at institutions of higher learning. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the frequency of academic dishonesty and what factors affect the tendency of dishonesty among Turkish health science school students? RESEARCH
DESIGN: This descriptive and cross-sectional study aims to evaluate academic dishonesty among university nursing, midwifery, and dietetic students. Participants and research context: The study sample consisted of 499 health science students in Turkey. The tendency toward academic dishonesty was investigated using the Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale. Ethical considerations: Institutional review board approved the study. Written permission was obtained from the researcher to use Turkish version of the Academic Dishonesty Tendency Scale.
FINDINGS: Of all the students, 80.0% claimed to refer to Internet during homework preparation and 49.1% of students reported to cite the references at the end of article on some instances. Of the students, 56.1% claimed never to have cheated in the exams. It was found that academic dishonesty was partly low (1.80-2.59) in students. For students using a library while doing their homework, mean scores were significantly lower ( p < 0.05). There were also statistically significant difference between mean scores and student's year in school, student's perception of school success, and frequency of Internet use while doing homework ( p < 0.05). DISCUSSION: The tendency of academic dishonesty was lower among students who use Internet and library more frequently. These findings are consistent with previous studies.
CONCLUSION: Measurements to take against academic dishonesty should be directed toward not only students but institutions and instructors as well.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic dishonesty; cheating; education; ethics; students

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26002938     DOI: 10.1177/0969733015583929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Ethics        ISSN: 0969-7330            Impact factor:   2.874


  7 in total

1.  Student and faculty perceptions: appropriate consequences of lapses in academic integrity in health sciences education.

Authors:  Tina Antill Keener; Marina Galvez Peralta; Melinda Smith; Lauren Swager; James Ingles; Sijin Wen; Mariette Barbier
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.463

2.  Snapshot of academic dishonesty among Malaysian nursing students: A single university experience.

Authors:  Ali H Abusafia; Nurhanis Syazni Roslan; Dariah Mohd Yusoff; Mohd Zarawi Mat Nor
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2018-05-08

3.  The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study.

Authors:  Müesser Özcan; Neşe Yeniçeri; Edip Güvenç Çekiç
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Predictors of academic integrity in undergraduate and graduate-entry masters occupational therapy students.

Authors:  Ted Brown; Stephen Isbel; Alexandra Logan; Jamie Etherington
Journal:  Hong Kong J Occup Ther       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 0.917

5.  Profiling nursing students' dishonest behaviour: Classroom versus clinical settings.

Authors:  Robert Lovrić; Boštjan Žvanut
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.344

6.  Comparison of the effect of training academic honesty using two workshop and virtual training methods on the knowledge and attitude of M. S. students.

Authors:  Pyam Nikjo; Fatemeh Vizeshfar; Nahid Zarifsanayee
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2021-05-31

7.  The Profile of Academic Offenders: Features of Students Who Admit to Academic Dishonesty.

Authors:  Liat Korn; Nitza Davidovitch
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-08-29
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.