Literature DB >> 2600261

The measurement of toothbrush wear.

H R Rawls1, N J Mkwayi-Tulloch, R Casella, R Cosgrove.   

Abstract

Toothbrushes wear out and progressively lose their ability to clean as the bristles abrade and become curled and matted. To study the factors that influence this process, we developed a quantitative measure of bristle splaying (wear index) and a method for judging and ranking the overall state of brush deterioration (wear rating) and used these to determine the effects of the individual user, brush design, time in use, and bristle material. Wear index is the average increase in brush-head dimensions normalized for maximum bristle length, and is dimensionless. Wear rating is a subjective means of classifying the increasing severity of deterioration on a scale of 0 to 3. The wear characteristics of a variety of commercial and experimental brushes with different design features were determined. Test variables were time in use, brush design (e.g., geometry and size of the brush head), and bristle composition. Time of use, the individual user, and bristle composition were found to have the strongest influences on splaying, and brush design was found to have the least influence. The wear index offers a quantitative means of comparing brushes of different dimensions at various stages of splaying. The wear rating, although qualitative, is a quick means of ranking brushes in various stages of deterioration. The two methods correlate (R2 = 0.87), and both are sensitive to several factors that affect brush durability. Therefore, these methods appear to be suitable not only for research, but also for quality control, the setting of standards, and for substantiation of advertising claims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2600261     DOI: 10.1177/00220345890680121201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  4 in total

1.  Bristle splaying and its effect on pre-existing gingival recession-a 12-month randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Graetz; A Plaumann; N Heinevetter; S Sälzer; J Bielfeldt; C E Dörfer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  A graphic tool to help consumers determine when to replace a toothbrush: a cohort study.

Authors:  Michèle Muller-Bolla; Alexandra Repetto; Ana Miriam Velly
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.607

3.  Toothbrush wear in relation to toothbrushing effectiveness.

Authors:  Martijn P C Van Leeuwen; Fridus A Van der Weijden; Dagmar Else Slot; Martijn A M Rosema
Journal:  Int J Dent Hyg       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.477

4.  Toothbrush deterioration and parents' suggestions to improve the design of toothbrushes used by children with special care needs.

Authors:  Ni Zhou; Hai Ming Wong; Colman McGrath
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.