Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen1, Marie Birk Jørgensen2, Anne Helene Garde2, Thomas Clausen2. 1. Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, Center for Health and Society, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark. nabe@sund.ku.dk. 2. The National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Shift workers are exposed to more physical and psychosocial stressors in the working environment as compared to day workers. Despite the need for targeted prevention, it is likely that workplace interventions less frequently reach shift workers. The aim was therefore to investigate whether the reach of workplace interventions varied between shift workers and day workers and whether such differences could be explained by the quality of leadership exhibited at different times of the day. METHODS: We used questionnaire data from 5361 female care workers in the Danish eldercare sector. The questions concerned usual working hours, quality of leadership, and self-reported implementation of workplace activities aimed at stress reduction, reorganization of the working hours, and participation in improvements of working procedures or qualifications. RESULTS: Compared with day workers, shift workers were less likely to be reached by workplace interventions. For example, night workers less frequently reported that they had got more flexibility (OR 0.5; 95 % CI 0.3-0.7) or that they had participated in improvements of the working procedures (OR 0.6; 95 % CI 0.5-0.8). Quality of leadership to some extent explained the lack of reach of interventions especially among fixed evening workers. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of the evidence of shift workers' stressful working conditions, we suggest that future studies focus on the generalizability of results of the present study and on how to reach this group and meet their needs when designing and implementing workplace interventions.
PURPOSE: Shift workers are exposed to more physical and psychosocial stressors in the working environment as compared to day workers. Despite the need for targeted prevention, it is likely that workplace interventions less frequently reach shift workers. The aim was therefore to investigate whether the reach of workplace interventions varied between shift workers and day workers and whether such differences could be explained by the quality of leadership exhibited at different times of the day. METHODS: We used questionnaire data from 5361 female care workers in the Danish eldercare sector. The questions concerned usual working hours, quality of leadership, and self-reported implementation of workplace activities aimed at stress reduction, reorganization of the working hours, and participation in improvements of working procedures or qualifications. RESULTS: Compared with day workers, shift workers were less likely to be reached by workplace interventions. For example, night workers less frequently reported that they had got more flexibility (OR 0.5; 95 % CI 0.3-0.7) or that they had participated in improvements of the working procedures (OR 0.6; 95 % CI 0.5-0.8). Quality of leadership to some extent explained the lack of reach of interventions especially among fixed evening workers. CONCLUSIONS: In the light of the evidence of shift workers' stressful working conditions, we suggest that future studies focus on the generalizability of results of the present study and on how to reach this group and meet their needs when designing and implementing workplace interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Eldercare; Night work; Quality of leadership; Stress; Working hours
Authors: Hylco H Nijp; Debby G J Beckers; Sabine A E Geurts; Philip Tucker; Michiel A J Kompier Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Clare L Bambra; Margaret M Whitehead; Amanda J Sowden; Joanne Akers; Mark P Petticrew Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Kirsten Nabe-Nielsen; Anne Helene Garde; Thomas Clausen; Marie Birk Jørgensen Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Sarah E Neil-Sztramko; Manisha Pahwa; Paul A Demers; Carolyn C Gotay Journal: Scand J Work Environ Health Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 5.024
Authors: Suzan Jw Robroek; Frank J van Lenthe; Pepijn van Empelen; Alex Burdorf Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen; Anne Konring Larsen; Andreas Holtermann; Karen Søgaard; Marie Birk Jørgensen Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2014-05-01 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Anne Dahl Lassen; Sisse Fagt; Maria Lennernäs; Maria Nyberg; Irja Haapalar; Anne V Thorsen; Anna C M Møbjerg; Anne M Beck Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2018-08-02 Impact factor: 3.894