Literature DB >> 2600204

Assessing risks and preventing disease from environmental chemicals.

D A Dunnette1.   

Abstract

In the last 25 years there has been considerable concern expressed about the extent to which chemical agents in the ambient and work environments are contributing to the causation of disease. This concern is a logical extension of our increased knowledge of the real and potential effects of environmental chemicals and the methodological difficulties in applying new knowledge that could help prevent environmentally induced disease. Chemical risk assessment offers an approach to estimating risks and involves consideration of relevant information including identification of chemical hazards, evaluation of the dose-response relationship, estimation of exposure and finally, risk characterization. Particularly significant uncertainties which are inherent in use of this and other risk models include animal-human and low dose-high dose extrapolation and estimation of exposure. Community public health risks from exposure to environmental chemicals appear to be small relative to other public health risks based on information related to cancer trends, dietary intake of synthetic chemicals, assessment data on substances such as DDT and "dioxin," public health effects of hazardous waste sites and contextual considerations. Because of inherent uncertainty in the chemical risk assessment process, however, we need to apply what methods are available in our efforts to prevent disease induced by environmental chemicals. There are a number of societal strategies which can contribute to overall reduction of risk from environmental chemicals. These include acquisition of information on environmental risk including toxicity, intensity and extensity of exposure, biological monitoring, disease surveillance, improvement in epidemiological methods, control of environmental chemical exposures, and dissemination of hazardous chemical information. Responsible environmental risk communication and information transfer appear to be among the most important of the available strategies for preventing disease induced by chemicals in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2600204     DOI: 10.1007/BF01324366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  13 in total

1.  An outbreak of methylmercury poisoning due to consumption of contaminated grain.

Authors:  T W Clarkson; L Amin-Zaki; S K Al-Tikriti
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1976-10

2.  Dioxin.

Authors:  F H Tschirley
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 2.142

3.  Methylmercury exposure and mortality in Japan: a life table analysis.

Authors:  H Tamashiro; K Fukutomi; E S Lee
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr

4.  Health effects of long-term exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  R E Hoffman; P A Stehr-Green; K B Webb; R G Evans; A P Knutsen; W F Schramm; J L Staake; B B Gibson; K K Steinberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1986-04-18       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Birth defects in the Seveso area after TCDD contamination.

Authors:  P Mastroiacovo; A Spagnolo; E Marni; L Meazza; R Bertollini; G Segni; C Borgna-Pignatti
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-18       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Fallacies of lifestyle cancer theories.

Authors:  S S Epstein; J B Swartz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Ranking possible carcinogenic hazards.

Authors:  B N Ames; R Magaw; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-04-17       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A pilot epidemiologic study of possible health effects associated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin contaminations in Missouri.

Authors:  P A Stehr; G Stein; K Webb; W Schramm; W B Gedney; H D Donnell; S Ayres; H Falk; E Sampson; S J Smith
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb

9.  Is 2,3,7,8-TCDD (dioxin) a carcinogen for humans?

Authors:  S M Ayres; K B Webb; R G Evans; J Mikes
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Selected pesticide residues or metabolites in blood and urine specimens from a general population survey.

Authors:  R S Murphy; F W Kutz; S C Strassman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.