BACKGROUND: Most clinicians feel that treatment for patients with acute primary axillosubclavian vein thrombosis ("effort thrombosis") is catheter-directed thrombolysis followed by thoracic outlet decompression. Several investigators feel that first rib resection (FRR) is not indicated in every case. No randomized data exist to answer this question. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was done using the terms "Paget-Schroetter syndrome," "upper extremity DVT," "first rib resection," "effort thrombosis," and "primary upper extremity thrombosis," with thrombolysis used as an "AND" term. We also specifically explored references cited to support either side of this argument in the past. Analysis was limited to patients aged 18 years or older with symptoms of 14-day duration or less undergoing thrombolysis for primary axillosubclavian vein thrombosis. Those studies that did not report follow-up, duplicate series from the same institution, and those in which patients were stented were excluded. Results were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, with groups assigned according to each authors' prospectively described algorithm. RESULTS: Twelve series were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to treatment after thrombolysis: FRR (448 patients), FRR plus endovenous balloon venoplasty (FRR + PLASTY; 68 patients), and those with no further intervention after thrombolysis (rib not removed; 168 patients). Symptom relief at last follow-up was significantly more likely in the FRR (95%) and FRR + PLASTY (93%) groups than in the rib not removed (54%) group (both <0.0001) as was patency (98%, 86%, and 48%, respectively; both <0.0001 vs. rib not removed). More than 40% of patients in the rib not removed group eventually required rib resection for recurrent symptoms. No differences in symptom-free rates were seen when comparing FRR with FRR + PLASTY. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute effort thrombosis who undergo thrombolysis, permanent symptom relief and long-term patency are more likely to be achieved in patients who undergo FRR with or without endovenous balloon venoplasty than those whose rib is left intact.
BACKGROUND: Most clinicians feel that treatment for patients with acute primary axillosubclavian vein thrombosis ("effort thrombosis") is catheter-directed thrombolysis followed by thoracic outlet decompression. Several investigators feel that first rib resection (FRR) is not indicated in every case. No randomized data exist to answer this question. METHODS: A MEDLINE search was done using the terms "Paget-Schroetter syndrome," "upper extremity DVT," "first rib resection," "effort thrombosis," and "primary upper extremity thrombosis," with thrombolysis used as an "AND" term. We also specifically explored references cited to support either side of this argument in the past. Analysis was limited to patients aged 18 years or older with symptoms of 14-day duration or less undergoing thrombolysis for primary axillosubclavian vein thrombosis. Those studies that did not report follow-up, duplicate series from the same institution, and those in which patients were stented were excluded. Results were analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, with groups assigned according to each authors' prospectively described algorithm. RESULTS: Twelve series were included. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to treatment after thrombolysis: FRR (448 patients), FRR plus endovenous balloon venoplasty (FRR + PLASTY; 68 patients), and those with no further intervention after thrombolysis (rib not removed; 168 patients). Symptom relief at last follow-up was significantly more likely in the FRR (95%) and FRR + PLASTY (93%) groups than in the rib not removed (54%) group (both <0.0001) as was patency (98%, 86%, and 48%, respectively; both <0.0001 vs. rib not removed). More than 40% of patients in the rib not removed group eventually required rib resection for recurrent symptoms. No differences in symptom-free rates were seen when comparing FRR with FRR + PLASTY. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute effort thrombosis who undergo thrombolysis, permanent symptom relief and long-term patency are more likely to be achieved in patients who undergo FRR with or without endovenous balloon venoplasty than those whose rib is left intact.
Authors: Riten Kumar; Katherine Harsh; Surbhi Saini; Sarah H O'Brien; Joseph Stanek; Patrick Warren; Jean Giver; Michael R Go; Bryce A Kerlin Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Thomas Garraud; Germain Pomares; Pauline Daley; Pierre Menu; Marc Dauty; Alban Fouasson-Chailloux Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 4.755