Literature DB >> 26001601

Damage control orthopaedics: Variability of construct design for external fixation of the lower extremity and implications on cost.

Catherine Logan1, Arthur Hess2, John Y Kwon3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate relative cost of external fixator constructs applied for damage control purposes in a cohort of advanced orthopaedic trainees and orthopaedic staff traumatologists. We also sought to evaluate physicians' understanding of component cost.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were asked to apply an external fixator for three separate fracture patterns in damage control fashion. A total of 19 physicians (nine PGY-4 residents, five PGY-5 residents, two orthopaedic trauma fellows and three orthopaedic staff traumatologists) participated. Total construct cost was calculated. Participants provided an estimate of the cost of each component in a fill-in format survey. Main outcome measures included cost of external fixator construct applied and the estimated cost of external fixator components.
RESULTS: Average whole sale cost of an external fixator construct was $5252 (±$1798). Of the three fracture types examined, the tibial plafond fracture external fixator construct on average cost the most, followed by the tibial plateau fracture and the femur fracture construct. The large ex-fix combination clamp was the major contributor to cost for each construct. The combination clamp may be substituted for a multi-pin clamp, resulting in significant cost savings. The self-drilling Schanz pin and the large ex-fix combination clamp were most highly underestimated (25% and 22% of their actual cost, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Innumerous construct designs exist and even small changes can significantly impact cost. Knowledge of component cost is low among staff and trainees. Education of component cost is vital to allow adequate consideration of construct design prior to fixator application.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Damage control orthopaedics; External fixator; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26001601     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  Intramedullary nailing of concurrent ipsilateral fractures of the tibia and femur: primary synchronous nailing versus staged osteosynthesis with temporizing external fixation.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Engorn; Bradley J Vivace; David Seligson; Travis Parkulo; Derek D Arrington; Salwa F Rashid; Craig Roberts; Rodolfo Zamora
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-08-06

2.  Does healthcare system device volume correlate with price paid for spinal implants: a cross-sectional analysis of a national purchasing database.

Authors:  Eli Cahan; Kelly McFarlane; Nicole Segovia; Amanda Chawla; James Wall; Kevin Shea
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Comparative Study of Function and Quality of Life in Patients with Fracture of the Tibial Plateau Operated with Locked or Conventional Plates.

Authors:  Bruno Gonçalves Schröder E Souza; Thiago Avelino Leite; Tarsis Aparecido Bueno da Silva; Carlos Otavio Fabiano de Faria Candido; Felipe Freesz de Almeida; Valdeci Manoel de Oliveira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-03-01

4.  Management algorithm of external fixation in lower leg arterial injury for limb salvages.

Authors:  Lei Jin; Song Zhang; Yuxuan Zhang; Xin Lin; Dehong Feng; Kejia Hu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 5.  Use of external fixators in developing countries: a short socioeconomic analysis.

Authors:  Pathmanathan Cinthuja; P C I Wijesinghe; Pujitha Silva
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2022-03-29

6.  Establishing a low-risk zone for a temporary extra-articular calcaneo-tibial pin fixation in an unstable ankle or subtalar joint.

Authors:  Ik Yang; Ho Won Lee; Huiying Xu; Seung Rim Kang; Hyong Nyun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.996

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.